The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About41000030015002_Variances_08-06-1992Variances 2 Barcode 128 r 0 \ . uiMVc ui Liouiiiy nccoruer n ^ County Of Otter Tail P® cjrtfy that the within instant was tiledt^^td i;this offl« y^^_i2L_-dayjf APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE and ^ niy Miaofilniad as Doc. * FROM U ) MINNESOTA ^ ri County RBCOfder----------l/jtyrity 7326Ga 0^-ot^ -<^2- los's?/Receipt No. Application Fee $ , ■ Owner:Phone: Last Name First Middle 1113 s-^/hO£>)ZHe.At}<5L SLDPin/ Street & No.City State Zip No. E. 3ffrTLcEL- I3SLake No.Lake Name I3J I 3A _ Lake Class cS\/Z R£0 N)OP<d£'S: 3<31 3 Range 3 ^Sec.Twp.Twp. Name 4 fAd-QL/.-M it '~7tUX-tc^ tA yi- 3-if-Z //■ /S S suf d-L /uL ldd (o' n?k le^UJ m.6' ~ e:>3 Legal Description: -----Ert: ^ r # « ^ Parcel Number ' 0/>0 ~ ^ S ~ CD j IgAc lC 0-(T)D I o'X 3"2-' A'DD^J. O S £ "(" VARIANCE REQUESTED IS: J O 1^' X /o' Uut DC As puv I €h\r 3LM K\tK. s4vu.c'^vve 'Ke. La/<^ 5 I DC X \ ^ fC {secv" ^ TLoo'^ M K \ S ' ^aC Pft> Seco^t) T Co(iU A BaCc 1a A u ^ l.(pio X 31 LbKa,QV> f V L aO'^OKo K •■ /OOK/ /Also aJo^jlfy: '^oHO ^tFt\\^SLLO OioX/22. (LM7cSL/^c\mAJ. B'^s/S In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans. Information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Taii County, i understand I must contact my township in order to determine whether or not any additionai variance and/or permits are required by the township for my proposed project. 7- 7 19 . XApplication dated SigtA^e Of Applicant / 10 rj IZ.Date of hearing: Time:M MOTION AS FOLLOWS: Motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried to approve the variance as requested as the additions to the existing building will not create a need for any additional variances. Hardship being a substandard lot of record with an existing building in a restricted zone. Chairman Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit/s) from Land & Resource MaiQgement required: Ln-u m(Date/Initial) YES NO mailed copy of Application to Applicant. MKL — 0483-001 258,371 — Victor Lundeen Co., Printers. Fergus Falls, Minnesota '0 V v'.* ■ .••4 -c/, : A- ■ '■V' ••• \ l.'C.r'l t i t" Request a variance to add a 10' by 32' addition to the back side of the cabin, with a 1 1/2' by 10' wide offset for entry, and a variance to add a second floor addition over the main structure 26' by 32', with a 4' wide balcony on the lake side of the cabin. The first floor will have a 4' by 18' entry deck and the second floor will have a 4' by 18' balcony. i Page 2. August 6th, 1992 Allen G. Highum - Approved Allen G, Highum, Mpls., MN. requested a variance of 105' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the replacement of an existing 12' by 60' manufactured home with a 16' by 66' manufactured home. The property is described as Lot 36 of Brightwood Shoreline. Dead Lake in Star Lake Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried to grant a variance of 105' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200' for the replacement of an existing 12' by 60' manufactured home with a 16' by 66‘ manufactured home. The structure will be no closer to the lake than the existing structure and the soil will not be disturbed by the replacement of the existing manufactured home. Hardship being a substandard lot of record. H. Duane Thoreson - Approved H. Duane Thoreson, Fargo, ND, requested a variance of 4 to 5' from the required side lot line setback of 1 O’ and a variance of 10 to 15’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for the construction of an addition to the existing structure. The property is described as part of Government Lot 4. Section 16 of Candor Township on Leek Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling , seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried to approve the variance of 4 to 5' from the side lot line and the variance of 10 to 15' from the ordinary high water level setback for the construction of an addition to the existing structure as long as the applicant keeps an area open for maintenance and repair of his drain field. Hardship being the terrain of the^pllcant's lot. . — Jim Chrlstopherson - Approved Jim Chrlstopherson, Moorhead, MN, requested a variance to add a 1 O' by 32’ addition to the back side of the cabin, with a 1 1/2'by 10'wide offset for entry, and a variance to add a second floor addition over the main structure 26' by 32’, with a 4' wide balcony on the lake side of the cabin. The first floor will have a 4' by 18' entry deck and the second floor will have a 4' by 18' balcony. The property is described as part of Government Lot 4, Section 3 and 35 of Nldaros and Girard Township on East Battle Lake. The applicant was represented by John Ftlippello, contractor with Lakeshore Detailing, at this hearing. The audience was polled with no one y speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson. // seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried to approve the variance as requested as the / additions to the existing building will not create a need for any additional variances. Hardstvfp being a substandard lot of record with an existing building in a restricted zone. / I! Truman Jules Theurer - Approved Truman Jules Theurer. Henning, MN, requested a variance of 4' from the required 10’ side lot line setback for the construction of a car port. The property is described as the southeast 30' of Lot 8 and all of Lot 7, Jonelsa Beach, Otter Tail Lake in Amor Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Bert Olson, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 4’ from the required 1 O’ side lot line setback for the replacement of an existing car port. The new car port will be constructed In the same place as the existing structure.