Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10000990344000_Variances_08-13-2015Variances Barcode 128 /S 1162960 Date Stamp CAROL SCHMALTZ OTTER TAIL COUNTY RECORDER FERGUS FALLS, MN RECORDED ON 08/19/2015 2:24 PM cn FEE: 4C.00 PAGES 2 WELL CERTIFICATE REC D: N gCD iO CO L&R Initial THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER, 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us 3oo» OO PROPERTY OWNERj3ccrrr'3ixiEf<Ri^'<imE PHONE 6Q5~^7SI~1 MAILING ADDRESS -4H C",. '^jjCC.rTSi ^ T. ^ O ^ CLA ^ ^ O^'h Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date I LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME ____LAKE CLASS HhSECTION TOWNSHIP 132.RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME PARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESS\0 OQC> RS 034^ orx^ LEGAL DESCRIPTION of Sonnst Cov/C TYPE OF VARI^CE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Setback Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster WECS Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. , o A i •'"js ‘/^C7 AP<7 CHA^^ac5 AIL€ v^Tith ,rO. CACAP Il?C7 ft. I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE / SANITATION CODE / SETBACK ORDANAND AN/OR WECS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED; IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. 2^/3 /dateSIGRE OF PROPERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 345.194 • Victor Lundeen Co Printers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota 3-7 /’/w/S.Date Of Hearing Time Motion Swenson Trust - Variance application approved as requested. (7:37 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 60’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of the proposed development approximately 40’ from the ordinary high water level as described in the variance application dated July 15, 2015 and as depicted on the drawings submitted with the variance application. The applicant’s proposed development is basically repair, does not negatively impact the neighboring properties and is no closer to the ordin^y high water level than the existing development. The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for proposed or future development. Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co, Assessor and the MN DNR LR Official/Date bk 072011-001 SCALE DRAWING FORM\ ‘ Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands and topographic features (i.e. bluffs). Must also complete the Impervious Surface Calculation (see back). Scale g uc £X\'?T\KiGi SfvfZASvC t)^l5■T7^d6. DMWl-J <1 04 I- 2 LA.v:t- CvxT vM^feAU--X ■ AR-EA Gc't>T)K]0^ VJ-ti'C-^ L OT N p<2iv\/ew^>y Pav^-ta 9\nt> Vd £ sca:::::3 Signature of Property Owner BK — 03201 3£4 12C • Violoi Lundeen r.i, Pinteis • Foigus Palis. MN • l-8U0-346-4870 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION List & identify all existing^&^prqposed onsite impervious surfaces on scale drawing. Lot Area (ft^):JSignature:Date:U fc \/ uo / Buildings Other Impervious Surface Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Ft^Ft^Ft^ Ft^ “70 £5.^0Dwelling I !Deck(s) Attached Garage Patio(s)\20 Detached Garage ^DO Sidewalk(s)^4 Storage Shed Landing(s) WOAS Driveway(s)'500 RCU Parking Area(s) Miscellaneous Retaining Wall(s) Landscaping (Plastic Barrier)t Miscellaneous 300 9poTOTAL BUILDINGS TOTAL OTHER Buildings Impervious Surface Percentage Maximum Allowable 20% Existing Proposed Total Lot Area Impervious Surface Ratio Ft^Ft^Ft^Ft^Total Buildings 40^S'/?5'300 -n au 100+XV/ , Buildings + Other Impervious Surface Percentage Maximum Allowable 25% Total Buildings + Other Impervious Surface Existing Proposed Total Lot Area Impervious Surface Ratio Ft^Ft^Ft^Ft^ b-m l‘^■595'gS'£3ioo 100+-T X Impervious Surface Calculation Worksheet 03-25-2014 SCALE DRAWING FORM \0 OoJ A Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands and topographic features (i.e. bluffs). Must also complete the Impervious Surface Calculation (see back). / - \ 0 Scale t. y - 0 V- ^ ^ io\'/ NAit-XjU, tr-<.\STlM6v 7 Pftop(75o0 ' P^dX-/ / / / / / 5'o/ / / / c/ / / / n.r|;4r'*'j J ff lo—4-------------------------(ji-X Signature of Property Owner Date BK —032Q14 354.120 • Vii'iui Utni.lijiin C<-. Piinlois * fwgus Palis, MN • I 8Uu-345-4870 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION List & identify all existing & proposed onsite impervious surfaces on scale drawing. Lot Area (ft^):Signature:Date: Other Impervious SurfaceBuildings ProposedExistingExistingProposed Ft^Ft^ Ft^Ft^ Deck(s)Dwelling Patio(s)Attached Garage Sidewalk(s)Detached Garage Landing(s)Storage Shed Driveway(s)WOAS Parking Area(s)RCU Retaining Wall(s)Miscellaneous Landscaping (Plastic Barrier) Miscellaneous TOTAL OTHERTOTAL BUILDINGS Buildings Impervious Surface Percentage Maximum Allowable 20% Total Lot Area Impervious Surface Ratio Existing Proposed Ft^ Ft^ Ft^Ft^Total Buildings 100+X Buildings + Other Impervious Surface Percentage Maximum Allowable 25% Lot Area Impervious Surface Ratio Existing Proposed TotalTotal Buildings + Other Impervious Surface Ft^ Ft^ Ft^ Ft^ 100+-r X= Impervious Surface Calculation Worksheet 03-25-2014 Wayne Stein Jack Johnson <jackjo@ATS-INC.com> Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:26 AM Wayne Stein; kayswenson.ret@gmail.com Jack Johnson Hearing for Variance 08/13/2015 Swenson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attn: Board of Adjustment Secretary, Wayne Stein Cc: Swenson Trust, Scott & Kay Swenson. 18874 Peninsula Trail, Battle Lake, MN 56515 RE: Hearing for variances with notification letter dated July 24, 2015 with Hearing date set for Thursday, August 13, 2015 @ 7:30pm. Reference location 18874 Peninsula Trail, Battle Lake, MN 56515 for Proposed Variance Date: 08/12/2015 In my absence, please accept and share my consideration towards the applied variances during this hearing. I am in full support of the proposed variances which has been applied for by the Swenson Trust CO/Scott and Kay Swenson. My personal property address is 18921 Peninsula Trail, Battle Lake, MN and is directly across the street from the Swenson property with the proposed variance. I have found the request to be conservative and well suited for the area. I am confident that when this variance is approved, that the proposed and actual changes to their property dwelling will add value to not only the immediate property, but the surrounding properties and lakeshore based on my personal real estate experiences. (I have owned multiple properties in various states which have gone through extensive remodels). I would encourage any member of this variance committee to call me directly with any questions or concerns, as my goal is to ensure that this variance is approved with your assistance. My physical home address for record is, 8383 Oakwood Drive SE. Becker, MN 55308 Thank you for your consideration! This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. LQ 1 Wayne Stein Jack Johnson <jackjo@ATS-INC.com> Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:20 AM Wayne Stein RE: Hearing for Varience 08/13/2015 Swenson From: Sent: To: Subject: I see that my footer did not attach which contains my cell phone number if needed. 320-761-8276 Thank you Wayne, From: Wayne Stein fmailto:wstein@co.ottertail.mn.us1 Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:18 AM To: Jack Johnson Subject: RE: Hearing for Varience 08/13/2015 Swenson Received - Thank you. Wayne Stein, County Auditor - Treasurer Government Services Center 510 FirAve W. Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Office Line - 218 998-8030 Direct Line-218 998-8041 Fax Line-218 998-8042 BiaBIIOTiTAII From: Jack Johnson Fmailto:iackio@ATS-INC.com1 Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:26 AM To: Wayne Stein; kavswenson.ret@amail.com Cc:Jack Johnson Subject: Hearing for Varience 08/13/2015 Swenson Attn: Board of Adjustment Secretary, Wayne Stein Cc: Swenson Trust, Scott & Kay Swenson. 18874 Peninsula Trail, Battle Lake, MN 56515 RE: Hearing for variances with notification letter dated July 24, 2015 with Hearing date set for Thursday, August 13, 2015 @ 7:30pm. Reference location 18874 Peninsula Trail, Battle Lake, MN 56515 for Proposed Variance Date: 08/12/2015 In my absence, please accept and share my consideration towards the applied variances during this hearing. I am in full support of the proposed variances which has been applied for by the Swenson Trust CO/Scott and Kay Swenson. 1 My personal property address is 18921 Peninsula Trail, Battle Lake, MN and is directly across the street from the Swenson property with the proposed variance. I have found the request to be conservative and well suited for the area. I am confident that when this variance is approved, that the proposed and actual changes to their property dwelling will add value to not only the immediate property, but the surrounding properties and lakeshore based on my personal real estate experiences. (I have owned multiple properties in various states which have gone through extensive remodels). I would encourage any member of this variance committee to call me directly with any questions or concerns, as my goal is to ensure that this variance is approved with your assistance. My physical home address for record is, 8383 Oakwood Drive SE. Becker, MN 55308 Thank you for your consideration! This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. 2 ' *.1 wenson Trust - Variance application approved as requested. (7:37 p.m.) - Continued/ Required setback is 100’. Kay Swenson represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. An email from Jack Johnson in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 60’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of the proposed development approximately 40’ from the ordinary high water level as described in the variance application dated July 15, 2015 and as depicted on the drawings submitted with the variance application. The applicant’s proposed development is basically repair, does not negatively impact the neighboring properties and is no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing development. The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for proposed or future development. Renee Harris - Variance application approved as requested. (7:46 p.m.) Renee Harris, Lot 68 and the Northerly 10’ of Lot 67 Midland Beach, Little Pelican Lake in Dunn Township, requested the following: Replace existing structure with new structure to reduce impervious surface. New structure will be the same setback (approximately 20’) from the lake. The garage will be 1’ closer to the road than existing (approximately 18’) setback. Total impervious surface will be reduced from 38.6% to 30.2%. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Letters from Darryl, Deb, Sarah, Nick and Deanna Hirsch and George and Wanda Dutton in support of the variance as requested were read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested in the variance application dated July 21, 2015 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. The proposed development will be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure (approximately 20’ from the ordinary high water level), 1 ’ closer to the road right-of-way (setback approximately 18’) and will result in a reduction of impervious surface coverage from 38.6% to 30.2%. The variance as approved for the proposed development will significantly improve the property. Hardship/practical difficult is a substandard lot of record. The variances as approved do not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for proposed or future development. M. W. Amundson Family Trust - Variance application approved as requested. (7:50 p.m.) M. W. Amundson, Family Trust, Lots 2 and 3 Block 1 Second Addition to Coney Island Acres, West Battle Lake in Girard Township, requested the following: In Lot 2, the configuration of the buildable area within the 75’ setbacks from the 2 shores of West Battle Lake result in a buildable area of 2,719 square feet, far below the required 8,400 square feet. In Lot 3, the configuration of the buildable area within the 75’ setbacks from the 2 shores of West Battle Lake result in a buildable area of 256 square feet, far below the required 8,400 square feet. This caused a practical difficulty to build within these 2 setbacks. At the August 3, 2006 meeting of the Board of Adjustment I was granted a variance for a building footprint area of 3,690 square feet within Lot 3 and shown on Anderson Land Surveying Certificate of Survey No. 7313. lam proposing to combine Lot 2 and Lot 3 into one tract with a total area of 58,872 square feet, almost 3 times the required lot size for a general development lake. The two lots would become permanently attached within the same ownership. I would rescind 1,863 square feet of the previously approved 3,690 square foot building footprint, shortening up the footprint away from the point and towards the existing cabin, leaving a remainder of 1,827 square feet. In return I ask that 5,259 square feet lying within Lots 2 and 3 and outside of the 75’ setback line be declared as buildable. August 13,2015Page 5