The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10000230159900_Variances_05-07-1998Variances 2 Barcode 128 '7/71M 8i!44Bl Offic? of County Recorder Couoty of Otter Tail I hsreby c«rtly th#t ttM wrtMn Instrument was filed ter nwd in this oftice on the ! fi nay of-----Q^^—A D. 19 _?8 aiJ/:/sAu ■Id y«« cUy Microfilmed as Ooc.#ijulfci.4£»l X. Zl/Alr^-o/y CoorKy Ractj^ THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739-2271 « « #COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK -N- « «Application Fee (aO _____ Receipt Number /^ SJl. S' 4^ alS. JL.PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE ADDRESSI 1^0 LcuUc. MhJ ^^5!S C l< 'ik-e^r/^l (ibcl:~d^ro.H LAKE NAME LAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASS 40SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGE FIRE NUMBER OR LAKE I.D. NUMBER L~ X 300 TOWNSHIP NAME ^y I t/Ayi* U-5 0^■2'<^ ~ ^ S 3 S ^ c. f^oL /.e-/ ;i3 > Va.C. /?d (/&-0^0-~ ^ S O ^ 0^02- 030^ So)Hh ^ C-L3 Bf t*l6s4- C^ly Car ;23 Syi^ Cnir, S 3 9‘ta/ £ 7Jl . C,', S ^ ? LEGAL DESCRIPTION 33\ s 90\-+o LO Ln C-L3 A/ -Ao SYy Z_« <?-P £.,f ) Blk l l ST AdJU -Ac Su.k- f> s-c Cov-fc £ 4o /oJc*-lAJs ro^cJ qs ' SI?^C^ S L9' S SS^ij TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) t/e>^£>oo~j.2-Gi s9-9 (SO S&.9 ^ Structure Size___Sewage System____ Subdivision ^C~ ClStructure Setback Misc.uster SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED ou- I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) ^ ' / Vi- £J ^ f / •' // C:i- 0< ci. ' '■y-/ /' ct<-'-4- ' 337'7 33774oLl('/j i! 3 3 / 33 ■ 00 ! c;7jfj[^f> y /CO- 00(XDt.<_c,^ /CO" ^ ) r? />i^0'0Of . //jO' rxy^^ A;//«=1 3yc- X('- 30 3o> XfC cc/.ij 3o.f /4'.^ /^Z ^/y//nAccepted By Land & Resource L & R Official/Date ^.3o /'/n.cT '?. 93 TimeDate Of Hearing Motion Arthur S. Peterson, ET. AL. Motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve the subdivision of a parcel of less than 5 acres from an existing 38.4 acre parcel with the condition that a registered surveyor’s drawing must be presented at the time of conveyance. It was noted that even if the proposed parcel met the five-acre minimum size requirement it would not increase the amount of water frontage available to this proposed parcel. It was also noted the proposed parcel has adequate area for a septic system. The proposed parcel will consist of part of Lot 22 and all of Lot 23, Sylvanus Crest, as well as, approximately 1.58 acres in the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and approximately . 17 acres in Government Lot 3. ^hairman/Otter Tail County Board of AdjustmentW Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR L R Official/Date bk 0797-001 267.383 * Victor Lundoen Co. Printers • Fergus Fells. Minnesota V!■J ‘ i\:? \«,: ••* . \•V\{ i •U')‘i I\f ?!i SYLVANUS CREST 3 ADJOINING LANDS IN GOV'T LOT 3 8 THE NEI/4 OF SWI/4.ALL IN SEC.23-TI32N-R|fOW,bTTER TAILCO.,MINN. \.TO UOT & \!■b! VI « IIIH\IO V A ft ' t<o L;i o (}CC \ST.ADO.II3£AR\NG » .*ftSSU^E'O t!^ weaP\9’»5“£■rvuVANUS'i66‘V N79P58*e 0.17 AC.i i‘f-: ,1 i I fi 'y ?'55| • o ;vV' I '.o. 1 * N6\.^^HI! ^..56.02* -G !,1.58 AC.I; !■> f At t , • ^ ^ tC'/</s Xx. ❖<?L' Q !h I !>.:!^ /. V •scale; i"=5o' date: 12/28/82 0 indicates iron monument < li t \ ’^o ;o,f XREG. SURVEYOR N0.6I74 .jr.-■; ! i.\i'« 1•'4 !\ 1 :I&\<V Jr5^V?,■is-I :i<9/!■ o I I vO;“2 i X.<7>4>0> \\'/ v*/!-Vi «VQi .’■,■• 400 O.f\j r^V / f7 / A;/4‘/c4 I \Cl «• \ 4BV / §8^'?I-sii.: V15I'. / '^SLz « ^ . /o'-_/:•*f*\\:xir*jr X , ey-..- jfr-5r''i;\ ===rT37 —.„■ 4'.,y «-'H. •■-'..■a»j«____-.:• Jv-i ■,1^■ ^y4 i //— , . '>?3—T___'■^-O^/ A // $V/VA /meva of /6;s«\^ a/!4'3^: ~/lOI //■'V.' /'c:/ ^ce i.Ou -.'I *.»z XV04 Ip f,!>5“,! «!9f-gar /XI <'j ; /L.o "Xu %>cn /■■!■I!}w Ii-J O A X/U.%• s.^o ) lU 'V/Z V■„.>■ ■-/4 10i(A Ui </s y V >4fto.o/DI %1?'Qs.«/XI 6$' .-55X"r\v' ^ '^9X 'i^^' o .o^>4 .totoo'^lO m c.'i I X /\lU btX•o Ii /XlOX s^**CVJ /'x'ttoX(/)Xt xx.XXI • \%\I ><X t, X \X_-X •••X*y.y.•t 1(■, i \ ®vsr•gj' XX■V! i. I\I IIf .XtoI .../■&' ■- CC.'•cV o1zg2’ >E 53' - -135'5ii N 90®00'W-f '. 'V>o :It to srfo*4^9P 248.18'I %■yti I S. LINE 6.L.3 ~7-‘•Vi.> .i =46" -----------K------Ir;•yt---------1320.30'- S88°20'38"W■Hr --T*'*»■■H- * •* «*'^i‘;.'4 e;uHEi- 1:■■M • ‘r /- May 7, 1998 Page 3 rthur S. Peterson, ET. AL. Arthur S. Peterson, Et. Al., Battle Lake, MN, requested a variance to subdivide a parcel of less than 5 acres from an existing 38.4-acre parcel. The property is described as part of Lot 22, all of Lot 23, Sylvanus Crest, part of the NE % of the SW % and part of Government Lot 3, Section 23 of Clitherall Township by Clitherall Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve the subdivision of a parcel of less than 5 acres from an existing 38.4 acre parcel with the condition that a registered surveyor’s drawing must be presented at the time of conveyance. It was noted that even if the proposed parcel met the five-acre minimum size requirement it would not increase the amount of water frontage available to this proposed parcel. It was also noted the proposed parcel has adequate area for a septic system. The proposed parcel will consist of part of Lot 22 and all of Lot 23, Sylvanus Crest, as well as, approximately 1.58 acres in the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and approximately .17 acres in Government Lot 3. Jim M. and Mary A. Lavold - Approved Jim M. and Mary A. Lavold, Moorhead, MN, requested a variance of 5 to 5.5’ from the required west lot line setback of 10’ and a variance of 5’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for a 10’ by 12’ addition to an existing dwelling 4.5 to 5’ from the lot line and 70’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as the West 20-14 feet of Lot 7 and the East 25’ of Lot 8, Provan Beach, Pelican Lake in Dunn Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 5 to 5.5’ from the required west lot line setback of 10’ and a variance of 5’ from the required ordinary high waster level setback of 75’ for a 10’ by 12’ addition to an existing dwelling 4.5 to 5’ from the lot line and 70’ from the ordinary high water level noting that the proposed addition will be no closer to either the lot line or the ordinary high water level than the existing structure. Hardship is a substandard lot of record. Clifford Treinen - Denied Clifford Treinen, Pelican Rapids, MN, requested a variance of 50’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the location of building sites on Lots 1 through 11, Wildlife Lane, 150’ from the ordinary high water level. It should be noted that Wildlife Lane is a proposed plat on a Natural Environment Lake. The property is described as part of Government Lots 5 and 6 and the SW % of the NW 14, Section 27 of Norwegian Grove Township by Jacobs Lake. The audience was polled with Carol Schmidt speaking against the granting of the applicant’s request. A letter from Kim J. Claypool and Carol F. Schmidt objecting to the applicant’s request was placed on file. The letter stated the following: there is no reason for the requested variance, reasonable alternatives exists, no hardship unique to the property exists, the granting of the variance would significantly alter the essential character of the locality and the right to enjoy the natural environment would be impaired. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would preclude a reasonable use of the property, other reasonable alternatives exist, and the existing hardship is a self created hardship. It was noted that the Board of Adjustment does not grant blanket variances for new developments.