The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10000140095006_Variances_09-06-2007Variances Barcode 128 6, ‘StPrtM6eX Xoo~J 1026139 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this instrument #_ was fiied/recorded in this office for r^ord on the | ^ day of,2007 aty^r Wendy L; Metc^f,County fl^wder.by: \ \ >i/yvfro^fV\p^aW^)eDtifv recording fee 121IG139 pm well certificate THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee MikT7 ih6jnj PHONE ^1 Z, ^^7^, COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / DateTRU5T OHO TOWNSHIP NAME ( ( 1^7^a PROPERTY OWNE^^ | DAYTIME MAILING ADDRESS 5i> -'IZ&LAKE CLASSLAKE NAMELAKE NUMBER /V /3 ZSECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE lOOOOl^OcP!^ CO (Q U/v^lE-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER /t/gAZ /egg/ yfe>ee<g^ ^,0^.07 LEGAL DESCRIPTION TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure Setback^p^Misc.Subdivision ClusterStructure Size Sewage System SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. zrT Z.|' u/-rtcir ■s.^e^^AocxICD 'f4-K= ^^ 4irrf5U,-^ IS 4^^ £^|fcc^+‘-S praf<Ay^ v5c.\*> 4c-^ K«=.\-^vitorTw^ pr£2p^/^T» otah^T-.^. lo’AI C*:**^^ 1-e.ss iSrupf-ioKt ^ beVv^d?, •i~U>0 ’^^'3‘fr'nrt "SUec^. buolc^lvva UJ'tU <oWS.'b'M<-4* \/l'C.V0 "Ftor h<i^V^b=i/i^ Of-TTje p-opo»^ h€i-V' ^xdcerd? iVM ip</v6^0MS ^ allou»cd!P^ «5lV'd? pro|>«>s<^( yyTi'v\C 7>yip^«c-4- g>rv -l-Ug. )<a,/<es Vncv~t~u.vls. ( \ c^V\<1^=^ I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCOSUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. e.i I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE management REGARDING THIS MATTER. 7iG^TURF OF PROP^TY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER / APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING ' (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) DATE « j g‘-aa f’/TiTimeDate Of Hearing 7* Motion Joan F. Torgerson Trust - Approved the variance as requested. (8:02 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Michael Harris to deny the variance as requested noting that the application is very similar to the application which was deny in August, a reasonable use of the property can be obtained without the granting of the variance and there is no adequate hardship unique to this property that would allow for the granting of a variance for the structure as proposed. This motion failed with Les Estes, Paul Larson, Steve Schierer and Carl Zick voting no. After additional discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Les Estes to approve the proposed development as described in the variance application dated August 15, 2007 and as depicted on the three drawings submitted with the application. This motion passed with Les Estes, Paul Larson, Steve Schierer and Carl Zick voting in favor of the motion. Those voting in favor of the motion noted that the proposed location is a reasonable location that will not obstruct the view from the adjacent properties and noting that the proposed development is similar to other development that has been approved by the Board in the past. Hardship is the terrain of the applicant’s property. Note - There was approximately 50 minutes of discussion regarding this variance§ppticafio^The information listed above is a very brief summary of the discussion; therefore, the secretary has decided to file the tape of tjji«TT^rinqyi«tfi the printej^inutes f(■ereferenc( {Oh^marr^tter fail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management ^ Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No V^/QIidIo ') L R 'Official/Date Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR L- bk 0407-001 329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls. Minnesota I ^DraGHlEBMH ’llliliijioi -—"iilD ' ‘iVi'i'iUI 3jCPs I I ^ MIGMPOINT HOMES LE5 4 JOAN TOP5GERSON OARAOEill ^iig "_ i s s. !6ITE PLAN •r - .u' ■, 'i -■r-- I; &Hgii||i,Eiiil !li 11 i k I i i u i i t l. ^mi ibi Lij| i !cf>i I I ^ HIGHPOINT HOMES LES 4 JOAN TORGERSON GARAGE - 1 e 8 S &ite'pl/w ’l> .;; ;mH i'>I; io bdculi0|5 3.'*o >J hZ.«?•;d\a■n§II*101■ _10 mS.7i D nooimoer>■ >jZ•.8 iZ_J , m :- i : 1-1 ................I 1 I 1 I ......................J_l_l_l_l_LLLi-±-L__ ? ■f. ____I tr-e' r-g'.f-C i V 00)(P 0z!?3szO'0§ -n s.I-X■j;0 ? ■?o »7) D >z ;01 ? ■ ; HSiH==!iiiE” 11 i !i’i'ITfiii3r, I I ) , MlflHPOINT HOMES • LES « JOAN T0RSER50N CsARASE l. ioir\(^i s E ;i Bs^ «alli 2K-I81T Pu: .1laiT 2b8 Bln Pb«a«: (3a)SS ftooa PLANSi. J £,x. September 6, 2007 Page # 4 F. Torgerson Trust - Approved the variance as requested, (8:02 p.m.)J Joan F. Torgerson Trust, part of Subdivision Lot 8 of the Subdivision of Government Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Section 14 of Clitherall Township, requested the following: Owner seeks a variance of 21’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for the placement of a detached garage. Hardship is the terrain features of the applicant’s property as well as obstruction of view for neighboring property owners. The structure will replace two existing storage structures and be farther from lake. Proposed building will cause less disruption of hill and terrain behind two existing sheds. Proposed building will not obstruct view for neighboring properties. The proposed building will not exceed impervious surface allowed, and proposal is reasonable and is consistent with minimizing impact on the lake natural landscape. Les and Sonja Torgerson and Jay Paulson represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Owen and Becky Thompson and Milt Paulson speaking for the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Michael Harris to deny the variance as requested noting that the application is very similar to the application which was deny in August, a reasonable use of the property can be obtained without the granting of the variance and there is no adequate hardship unique to this property that would allow for the granting of a variance for the structure as proposed. This motion failed with Les Estes, Paul Larson, Steve Schierer and Carl Zick voting no. After additional discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Les Estes to approve the proposed development as described in the variance application dated August 15, 2007 and as depicted on the three drawings submitted with the application. This motion passed with Les Estes, Paul Larson, Steve Schierer and Carl Zick voting in favor of the motion. Those voting in favor of the motion noted that the proposed location is a reasonable location that will not obstruct the view from the adjacent properties and noting that the proposed development is similar to other development that has been approved by the Board in the past. Hardship is the terrain of the applicant’s property. Note - There was approximately 50 minutes of discussion regarding this variance application. The information listed above is a very brief summary of the discussion; therefore, the secretary has decided to file the tape of this hearing with the printed minutes for future reference. Eugene and Darrnell Krell - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (8:50 p.m.) Eugene and Darrnell Krell, part of Government Lots 5 and 6, Section 12 of Maine Township by Pickerel Lake, requested the following: Request lots buildable for non-residential use. Request to divide one parcel into 3 separate parcels, matching (across) from lake front Lots 2, 3, and 4. The west lot of the 3 back lots is taxes as part of Krell Lake Lot 4. There are 2 remaining lots. The owners (Hagen) of lake front Lot 2 will purchase the east back lot (150’ by 358’ deep). Also request the middle section to be available for sale in future to right buyer. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to approve the proposed subdivision with the following conditions: 1.) the east 1/3 of Tract B as identified on the registered surveyor’s drawing dated September 17, 1987 must be permanently attached to Lot 2 Block IHaggstrom Beach Fourth Addition, 2.) the remaining 2/3 of Tract B must be permanently attached to Lot 4 Block 1 Haggstrom Beach Fourth Addition until such time as the applicants are able to convey the middle 1/3 of Tract B to the owner of Lot 3 Block 1 Haggstrom Beach Fourth Addition at which time the west 1/3 of Tract B must remain permanently attached to Lot 4 Block 1 Haggstrom Beach Fourth Addition and the middle 1/3 must be permanently attached to Lot 3 Block 1 Haggstrom Beach Fourth Addition, and 3.) a registered surveyor’s drawing identifying the three tracts must be presented at the time of conveyance. It should be noted that the conveyance of the middle 1/3 of Tract B must be accomplished on or before February 15, 2008; otherwise, the middle 1/3 and the west 1/3 would remain permanently attached to Lot 4 Block 1 Haggstrom Beach Fourth Addition unless the applicants sought another variance.