The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10000140093000_Variances_11-05-1998Variances Barcode 128 835235 Office of County Recorder County of Otter Tail I iweby otndiy that ttw vwtftin Instrumem was filed far reword ifi tdis office onjh^B____li —1}jD1L__A.D. ao«l WHS duty Microfilmed as Ooc.#235 iiX, i/yifciffluy /V U County Recom L'>d THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739-2271 ***COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK***/ £50Lo-Application Fee Receipt Number PROPERTY OWNER Lv ^0 iq n) fi, T/?urrofi ADDRESS /?Jp~ J Jit < L_______fi,arTL^ LOKH __________LAKE NAME (L L J SECTION / V TOWNSHIP / 3 tK RANGE V/O TOWNSHIP NAME T//S L PARCEL NUMBER ^ Op Oo OOP DAYTIME PHONE JlJfq Roacy KnLAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASS A .-3 .ttfryFIRE/LAKE I.D. NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION p r SL V 4 PT ^5 OF ^ ^ Of CL ^L . 73 TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Size Sewage SystemStructure Setback Cluster Misc.Subdivision SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED Z P. 3 FT I?/(V pof<L b Iv. \ ^ w 5 (Xx (J -r <r ^ \j<^ l(s .l,-tT V-y \V^?cA3 1 »'T I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. Au^t)9P. DATESIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 000 ‘7’^ -ryO y? ' 00<f- 9 c0\ - (007 a/t JL. 9^ - O9^ ■ 00 5: 79-000^ 7 ^ -O'^ 76i-00^ ,'•* fj-MO ^3-00/ ' 00 ■ C / ^9-006 99-oOr 99-OOJ Accepted By Land & Resource L & R Official/Date //• 9<P 7'-6C> /?/>^>-TimeDate Of Hearing Motion Lyman A. Trutna - Approved Motion was made by John Everts, seconded by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 5' from the required 18’ maximum height of a non-dwelling structure for the construction of a 40’ by 80’ pole barn having an overall height of 23’. It was noted that the structure will be used for equipment storage and that the proposed location will not restrict the view from the adjacent properties. A ■ g ■^Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR L R OfTicial/Date bk 0198-001 291.306 • ViciOf Lundeon Co. Printers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota I I \* I SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1,2,3 a 4 I 1 9 ^ /Ac^PfiOf^\ \/7^ — I •• 7- C\ A'/o^a/r ^ ? ^ >■ T. ' ? o P ~n ^ ^ d ee.0'' 3 ^ •N,ff|VJ Tl r l£ / •? r- Novembers, 1998 Page 4 Mary Kuppich - Approved Mary Kuppich, Fargo, ND, requested a variance “for construction of a 4/12 sloped roof on existing one story flat roof lake cabin. Home on East & West side are one-story houses. Any construction is above 8’ to 9’ - viewing site from next door.” The property is described as Lot 11, Oak Haven Beach, Tamarac Lake in Scambler Township. It was noted the next day after the meeting that a letter from James E. and Janice M. Venaas opposing the applicant’s request was placed in the file. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried to approve a variance for the construction of a 4/12-sloped roof on an existing one-story flat roof cabin. It was noted that the footprint of the original structure would not be increasing. ^^^^L,yman A. Trutna- Approved Lyman A. Trutna, Battle Lake, MN, requested a variance of 5’ from the required 18’ maximum height of a non-dwelling structure for the placement of a 40’ by 80’ pole barn, with 14’ side walls, having an overall height of 23’. The property is described as a 6.73 acre tract in Sub Lot 4 and Sub Lot 5 of Government Lot 2, Section 14 of Clitherall Township by Clitherall Lake. The audience was polled with William Gray speaking for the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 5’ from the required 18’ maximum height of a non-dwelling structure for the construction of a 40’ by 80’ pole barn having an overall height of 23’. It was noted that the; structure will be used for equipment storage and that the proposed location will not restrict the view from the adjacent properties. Elsie.Griffith - Approved Elsie Griffith, Colfax, ND, requested a variance of 7’ from the required lot line setback of 10’ for the construction of an addition to an existing dwelling 3’ from the lot line. The property is described as Lot 24, Recreation Beach and part of Government Lot 4, Section 28 of Amor Township by Otter Tail Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 5’ from the required lot line setback of 10’ for the construction of an addition to an existing dwelling 5’ from the lot line. It should be noted that the applicant’s proposed development cannot exceed 25% of the total lot area. Hardship is a substandard lot of record. Mark and Dani Dahlstrom - Approved Mark and Dani Dahlstrom, Oakes, ND, requested a variance of 4’ from the required lot line setback of 10’ for the addition of-a screened porch to an existing cabin 6’ from the lot line. In the same line with existing cabin. The property is described as the East 50’ of the South 249.5’ of Lot 1, Robinson’s Addition, Clitherall Lake in Nidaros Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Dave Trites and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 4’ from the required lot line setback of 10’ for the addition of a screened porch to an existing cabin 6’ from the lot line. It was noted that the proposed addition would be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure. Hardship is a substandard lot of record. It was noted that the granting of this variance would not establish precedence in this immediate area.