The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10000130089003_Variances_05-02-1996Variances 2 Barcode 128 A VARIANCEOffice of County Recorder County of Otter Tail I hereby certify that the within instrunwnt was fiiecl; for reOTd in this office on the /i? day of /7y2y A.D.19<^^^ at M. and was dmy Microfilmed as Doc.# V! Otter Tail County Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 (2-\B) 739-2271 T** usasv 'mf 1X/V\ County Recorddiw y '2-0 _____Deputy — Please Complete With Black Ink — .13May 2nd, 1996 First Middle /^Cr'tn //______________ ' Crty Last hlame Owner;Phone: tee £ . Street &State Zip No. Lake No.7?Lake Name Lake Class /K^r’cc//RangeSec. /3 /3:^Twp.Twp. Name M43Legal Description:Fire No. or Lake ID # Si/,Z-oT5Ca-U^J L^oT / /0-06t)'i3-00?1-00^Parcel Number VARIANCE REQUESTED IS: — Tc M-^'Ce-z*j<71 ^ a-cot/jUTT'^ Jl<FC- Ck-vv«^ CtJr}-ctjLeQ yC-^ /uL^aOLyL^^ iijju a-AJt.^ cjlXT ‘^S/2-- • oJIMt-ia) AU-ya-y' "to 6-cuJ^ 6> 2^^-^ IttFiX^ ^0-^ /¥/X^ ^anT /U230t>cx :Z5U^ j 7lkho-Jl_ ^Q-C^-et~c-^r>--.ri^lrr:^l-^ , Y ■ ^ ^,.^-7*-^ jOA-X-a-Je^^n-y^ yA-'n.. cAjC^ CO'CltZjPl^ ^2&7S~<i-xxyiaAJL-Xx.x-^ d-<AAy_,AXAuxjLaf~CxJTHyC-^i^<xjA^.e(i_ ^ryc^-Cf LArt%^gA.ya«giAdtA^A. . ^-Ti9 ^ In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. /-o -*-<^ PcK— 0-tAAA ^ - - -^ n T V « -a-zyoiy e-tjLAJ y Signature Of Applicant iTfi-■ 19 .Application dated 19 ^ ^S' F.£___^Date of hearing; ____ MOTION AS FOLLOWS: Motion was made by Cecil Femling, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship had been shown and if the variance was granted more than 25 percent of the total lot area would be covered with impervious surfaces. Time:M Chairm Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) from Land & Resource Management required:?2^ ' (Date/Initial) / YES NO mailed copy of Application to Applicant. BK 0796-001 277.205 • Victor Lundeon Co., Printers • Fergus Faljs. Minnesota 4,\ K 2M i*md?d N ir "'5-JutJ^dbii -r:5tr;-r-,'3 BSEISiSKl'- b r- ,w'2 W /\ i.\ I \‘ iS;-.I v'l.b:/ I : iS i-vem^^ c:> I Pb - “i X ^r' '-f t \-axXo F1^, I;^£2V' A—-IL3 _<d (.0«eT/\j. 13k:•:LQ1i■-: X; ,F'A'■‘n 7 1 I"^S" 1 V\/ / 7^ ' Ikl Lj:oAiDib&i7^/h \mw-M1 IA/1I XA' /!. -f^-1 “—*1 'i>>s«?^«s F~^ r £L^:frV_- i■}-iac;-.f - f V 'i7^I f 1 4 -TAI (/ / f.-¥I A, I QAjl^Ry 9\ u(v:. \^i- yy uR= _i 'r,-|!Si3 A C^'sjOiif f}iAA/UAytIX./ ■ r *3^c3,iiI4<N "iS 9 /o X/0^ICO <skop ?/c i£dJ:l> ;r F-iJ Z.. 'SJH l4xJlX.y.) '=/d'^z /> iX iV I % \/oti.—X/?A a=’s 0"ei /0•i;/^iJZ.■j.KS <■ K 4£=aifcS^iL.A /m jMmf-!T-: ..\3:;i -nft^ Omt -2^■r J IAmaz^C 3»g‘ko\<In':l!»T 1 'o fJvJJj ; t. dLA\\\ —rxIiI ^71 L-F fSL L^Mclr \JX mf! i-i\•*'* -$lX7yi xi_/.51 1^tJIL i\cM t/<b V i lJz-g® W-=WB 2^ //y /^tlA^ Jj. .cJz.?\/jM // / A/vf I: ''■/ /' ^ pA A=7^:^'TI-iv 7 \S>.LZX "v,’-.X77^7)„CD, A)07 C'X7:y Al-,Tc:. 4 "/A/!l jhlXa L>. 2 A T V 111 ApX C)/z€ £>-1 I a?A1 7kDT - -L^' May 2nd, 1996 5 Richard Ressler - Aprpoved Richard Ressler, West Fargo, ND, requested a variance of 70’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 20’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for the construction of a proposed 14’ by 19’ screen porch 30’ from the ordinary high water level and a variance of 58’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 8’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for the construction of a 12’ by 12' storage shed 42’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as part of Government Lot 5, Section 32 of Hobart Township by Sybil Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, seconded by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried, to approve the construction of a proposed 14’ by 19’ screen porch being no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing dwelling and to approve a variance of 58’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 8’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for the construction of a 12’ by 12’ storage shed 42’ from the ordinary high water level with the condition that the use of the garage as a second dweliing must be discontinued. ark R. and Carol J. Lundholm - Denied Mark R. and Carol J. Lundholm, Clitherall, MN, requested a variance to cover more than 25 percent of their total lot area with impervious surfaces, and a variance of 6’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the location of the proposed 28’ by 32’ garage 14’ from the road right-of-way or a variance of 3’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ and a variance of 3’ from the required drain field setback of 10’ for the location of the proposed 28’ by 32’ garage 17’ from the road right of way and 7’ from the drain field. Approximately 29% of the total lot area will be covered with impervious surfaces after construction of the proposed garage. The property is described as Lot 2, Alberg’s Survey Lots, Clitherall Lake in Clitherall Township. The audience was polled with Rodney Hinz speaking against any variance from the required road right-of-way setback. After consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship had been shown and if the variance was granted more than 25 percent of the total lot area would be covered with impervious surfaces. Adolph Ista • Approved Adolph Ista, West Fargo, ND, requested a variance of 72’ from the required side lot line setback of 90’ for the construction of a 10’ by 10’ by 10’ storage shed 57’ from the ordinary high water level and 18’ from the east property line. The property is described as part of Government Lot 1, Section 6 of Dead Lake Township by Pine Lake. "The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Randall Mann, and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 72’ from the required side lot line setback of 90’ for the construction of a 10’ by 10’ by 10’ storage shed 57’ from the ordinary high water level and 18’ from the east property lot line. Hardship being the terrain of the applicant’s property. It was noted that the property directly to the east is not buildabie.