The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10000020014004_Variances_05-05-2011Variances Barcode 128 O ' ^ ' I \ DOC# 10919111091911 -1091911 Fee $46,00 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL COUN TY MINNES01 A Cenified. Filed, and/or Recordec May 10 20-11 2,00 PM Wendy L. Metcalf. Recorder Well Certificate [ j Ret'd Returned To: LAND & RESOURCE By, LL THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us 90 Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Datei\ac^cxr(^t ~Tuc.k^r B.T A PROPERTY OVt/NER dnritactj%^A£L\h y DAYTIME PHONE^^I^ ~ <^^ll ^ICo ___i^n ^ MAILING ADDRESS RO/O S/drT<<?t A<2. . Rr^4)0 ms 6D¥^£i-LhifiL. / v/k-tg.LAKE NUMBER SECTION ^ LAKE NAME LAKE CLASS C. '/'I'tg r<:i 11TOWNSHIP 13 JL RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME PARCEL NUMBER E-911 ,, ,ADDRESS Liiile My, fZnJ. ___________(t ^/i A/ I OODDonon LEGAL DESCRIPTION AC LL' 3.0P' ^ yc’C’' i^ci I S. i iT\CAuL(iinyj TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) APR I 20J1 LAVIT ,,*4 structure Setback Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. ■fWit iaice te ^v<rto SL \crbs o-£ \oO'Ct uplMl i - I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. OF PROPEf^TY OWfiER /(aGE^ FOR OWf»(ER ^ ^ - // r IGNATURE DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) J-7 <5oTimeDate Of Hearing Motion Margaret Tucker - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (7:00 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and carried with Rod Boyer voting no, to approve the proposed subdivision as requested with the conditions that a registered surveyor’s drawing must be provided and all structures must be placed at least 10’ from the lot line when the proposed subdivision is officially recorded. >r'.V lan/Otter taiTCounty Board of Adjustrr>^tChkf Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management y Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) .•i r: , No S//D//fCopy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR L R/Official/bate bk 0407-001 329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota May 5, 2011 Page # 2 ^yl^rgaret Tucker - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (7:00 p.mi) Margaret Tucker ET AL, part of Government Lot 1,’Section 2 of Clitherall Township by West-Battle Lake, requested a variance to subdivide an existing 2.62 acre parcel into two lots. Each lot would iiiave 100’ of width. One of the proposed lots would have 59,300 square feet of area and the other lot would have 55,000'square feet of area. The minimum size for metes and bounds parcels in the shoreland area is 5 acres. The mihimum size for platted lots on a . ■ ■ general development lake is 100’ of water frontage, 100’ of width at the building setback and 20,000 square feet of area. Also, requesting a variance to leave an existing shed less than 10’ from the proposed lot line. Alice Hofstad , represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from Bob and Becky Cox in opposition to the variance as requested was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and carried with Rod Boyer voting no, to approve the proposed subdivision as requested with the conditions that a' registered surveyor’s drawing must be provided and all structures must be placed at least 10’ from the lot line when the proposed subdivision is officially recorded. Discussion of the Magnotto Application - (7:10 p.m.); The following is from the April 14, 2011 Board of Adjustment Meeting- Andrew & Leanne Magnotto - Approved the application as requested with a condition. (8:26 p.m.) Andrew and Leanne Magnotto, Lots 51 and 52 Block 1 of Crystal Beach. West McDonald Lake in Dora Township, requested the following; Requesting to replace the roof on the existing 20’ by 28’ structure. The proposed replacement will be in the same footprint. The existing pitch of the roof is 6:12 and will be.replaced by a 12:12 pitch roof. Requesting to replace existing 16’ by 10’ deck, which is currently 36’ frbmithe ordinary high water level and , other impervious surfaces on property with a new 14’ by 16’ covered deck approximateiy 48’ from the ordinary high - water level. Replacement would decrease the impervious surface from 13.7% to 12.8%. The proposed replacement project will be approximately 48’ back from the ordinary high water levei on West McDonald Lake and 35’ back from ordinary high water levei on Brown Lake. Requesting a 52’ setback variance from the ordinary high water ievel-;on West McDonaid and 165’ setback variance from ordinary high water level on Brown Lake. The current structure is approximately 8’ from the alley. Proposed project will not change location. Current shed is'approximateiy 3’ from the alley, 23’ from Brown Lake and 75’ from West McDonald Lake. Proposing to replace roof on existing structure. Requesting setback variance of 177’ from Brown Lake and 25’ variance from VVest McDonald. Location of shed will not be changed. Shed is 10’ from holding tank. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer, and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the application with the condition that no portion of the proposed development can be within 50’ of West McDonald Lake. It was also noted that the variances as approved do not directly or indirectly grant any other variances than.those outlined in the request. Hardship/practical difficuity is substandard iots of record and iakes on two sides of the property. At the May 5, 2011 Board of Adjustment Meeting- Mark Running, Land and Resource Department, reported that the measurements presented at the Aprii-j14^-2011 meeting were not accurate and a site inspection indicated additional concerns with the location of the hoiding tank and the proposed development. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and carried with Rod Boyer abstaining, to approve the variances necessary to repiace the roof on the ■ existing. 20’ by 28’ structure as described in the variance application and to deny all other variances as requested for ' the other deveiopment/improvements noted in the variance application. It should be noted that the variance as approved allows improvements only to the existing dwelling and only in the exact footprint. 800 Sunset Lane Belton, MO 64012 April 11, 2011 Otter Tail Land and Resource Management Government Services Center 540 Fir Avenue West Fergus Falls, MN 56537 To Members of the Board of Adjustments: This is an addendum to the Application for Variance which I submitted to the Land and Resource Management office. As was pointed out to me by that office, the boat shed--#2 on the drawing—is quite close to the proposed property line. Actually, the shed is on the property line. We can handle that in two ways. Number 1, our preferred way, is to leave it where it is, and move it only if it is an issue with a purchaser of lot B. Number 2, if you cannot approve that variance, we will move the shed at least 10 feet from the proposed property line and in compliance with all ordinances. If you have further questions or comments, please contact me (816 318-4488) or email: peRgy(g)feagins.net or at the above mailing address. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Respectfully, ret Feagins ^-1 RECEIVED APR \ f 2011 LAND & RESOURCE A Taken from map of S. 'A Sec. 2, T. 132, R.40 Clitherall Township by Robert B. Oslund, County Surveyor, Otter Tail County, MN undated, but assumed to be from the late 1950s This portion shows the lots in the "Little Mo" area of West Battle Lake. The lot which we are requesting to divide is highlighted (lots 6 and 7). & Si \I tI -rrr///I //Iif//I ^•/330 - _ _l I/I <-r I 'v;~/✓ §90^ fOr~~~~210 LlJ 01 ii SCALE DRAWING FORM^ ■ {{ 1 c^OO Tax Parcel Number(s) ^ The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. bluffs), and onsite impervious surface calculations. 1.5 ^iO/P Q.et A- p,- <1?^^% Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) RECEIVED APR I i 2011ALAND & RESOURCE / 5^CiSOf\a.l co-h/fi o? pk sheet 3 oeopd ^ ■fish het/re S U)£ll ^ Sep-iic. *7 'firepUee^ ^ pr-pppsed edui'sfeti^ ^ Ipt hI 0 cCi •> o -fjH) VA 0 0 cx Of N'' Little Mo Repaid i Q i Ci\oe> -feet i i 338.596 • Victc Lundeen Co. rtinters • Fergus Falls. MN « 1-800-346-4870 Signature of Property O( BK —0909 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): \0/0/0 Ft2Structure(s): MA Ft2Deck(s): Ft2Driveway(s): NA Ft2Patio(s): Ft2Sidewalk(s): N/A!stairway(s):Ft2 mA Ft2Retaining Wall(s): c2 ^ (lot'll IG 4g ? Ft2 (Vip onLandscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:.Q O Ft2 \ni?Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: R2LOT AREA: s_^ A 3d>o ■T _B_s;S^ox2j2. LOT AREA R D /I aiS^7/3 .%X 100 =£» :IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO V\ v.j; :-i ') 1 rl^:!*V V'* TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 3 r ■tj 1>: i April 28, 2011 t 1 [ Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Attn: Wayne Stein Otter Tail County Government Services Center 510 Fir Avenue West Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Re: Applicant: Margaret Tucker, et al. Property Address: 39359 Little Mo Road Dear Mr. Stein: We are writing in opposition to the variance requested by Ms. Tucker to split her 200’ lot into two 100’ lots. We are the owners of the property directly to the west of the subject property; our property address is 39341 Little Mo Road. We purchased our property in August of 2008, with the intention of demolishing the' existing seasonal cabin and building a year-round house. This property arid this shoreline appealed to us because it is not crowded or over-developed like the shoreliries on so many other lakes. When we bought our lot, we assumed that the surrounding lots and the shoreline would remain as they currently are, especially given the fact that these lots have had existing cabins on them for many years. We did not anticipate that an additional house would be built between our property and Ms. Tucker’s cabiri. Giveri that her lot has been a 200’ lot since this shoreline was initially developed, we did not imagine that she would be allowed to split it jn.two. ■ : ;• The west 100’ of the subject property is completely wooded with ho current access to the road or the lake. Developing it will undoubtedly affect the shoreline. Many shoreline boards and shoreline owners are strongly against additional development on the shorelines of their lakes due to environmental, water quality and aesthetic concerris. We are asking that you consider the same. . i. V i ,Thank you for your consideration. Bob and Becky Cox 4955 Wilderness Lake Circle Elko,MN 55020 (952) 461-3472 bcox@integra.net •1 -i. 5