The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About38000990799000_Variances_11-02-20061008845 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that- / c ^ c: this instrument a was filed/recorded iathis office for record on the ______ —f—day of V 2006 atiZi^mKSmJ Wendy\L Metcalf. County Re^ordei^ ^well certificate THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us '/d/sJot, Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date PiCVC^lEL 2.)^-S1l-^5UDAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS l^t>LAKE CLASSLAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME TOWNSHIP RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME fT\ <:U ITV OILSECTION mr>E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER SZ.4^B r?ctn?aL>g k/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION U 15^ Q_cun<^ om TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) X Misc.Sewage System Subdivision ClusterStructure SizeStructure Setback SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. - Ti^c cisck “ — It (aJ£)u\A tx.. ]ocxAe<\ oi" ^3 -■fV.9 *7 iCa/V!b.) ^ ry:- Ilxfd Ux^Li be no lakevidu^ ^ aA - tV, TW (XrccA cx SilUi, LUi)^lc3i C/Qj;>i’v">\(JccAe TV\^esV 1V t^STvtw heWSEj rs^o^i 3HE SHORELANDI UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENT MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. N, DATESIGNATURE ORPROPERTf OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 7dVr’/0yobDate Of Hearing Time Motion Stephen and Joy Christenson - Approved the variance as requested. (7:04 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of T from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a 9’ by 16’ addition located 93’ from the ordinary high water level as described in the variance application dated October 11, 2006 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. The Board noted that the proposed development will not increase the overall size of the existing structure and will not obstruct the view from the adjacent properties. Hardship is terrain features of the applicants’ property. irman/Otter Tail Couflty^oard of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management SitL VYes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No L R Official/Date 'Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR bk 0106-001 V. Lundeen 324855 55' + DR - CLOSEST POINT TO LAKEQS' UJjDAkuimo &0iHa/u7cJ lolia^lolp h'<75'LOT AREA -48,600 SO FT HOUSE/GARAGE AREA -3,700 SQ FT DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALKS -3,300 SO FT APPROX 13X IMPERVIOUS 46'-8' LDT LINE 6'^6' 60'-9'-10' 8 A9'-2 830'-6'14' 34' 4' 7 49'-lD* WAY/(SAftKINi :4',5' PLOT LINEi 14' 72'-ll' November 2, 2006 Page # 2 Richard L. and Janet Bogen - Denied. (6:50 p.m.) Richard L. and Janet Bogen, part of Lot 5 Sundberg Point Second Addition and part of Government Lot 4, Section 12 of Maine Township by Pickerel Lake, requested a variance of 2’ 6” and a variance of 4’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the placement of 14’ by 28’ addition 7’ 6” from the lot line on the road side of the structure and approximately 6’ from the lot line on the lake side of the structure. Eugene Ouren represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Mike Sundberg expressing concerns with the actual location of the lot line. Mr. Sundberg noted that he did not know the actual location of the lot line. A letter from Joan Middleton opposing the variance as requested was noted for the record. After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and the applicants have other development alternatives that would not required the granting of a variance. Robert and Kathy Hoffert - Approved a modification to the variance as requested. (6:55 p.m.) Robert and Kathy Hoffert, part of Lot 20 and all of Lot 21, Echo Ranch Riviera Third Addition, Otter Tail Lake in Otter Tail Township requested the following: We have to replace the worn out deck on our cabin. On the west side we would like to screen it in with a roof due to loss of our shade trees in the storm last year. We would like to make it 12’ by 24’ adding 4’ to the west which would be 35’ from the canal and add a 12’ by 35.5’ open aired deck (south side) being approximately 35 to 36’ from canal. Required setback is 75”. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve an 8’ by 24’ screened in/enclosed deck on the west side of the existing structure and to approve a 12’ by 31.5’ open aired deck on the south side of the existing structure. Stephen and Joy Christenson - Approved the variance as requested. (7:04 p.m.) Stephen and Joy Christenson, Lot 4 Block 1 Oakview Shores, Pickerel Lake in Maine Township, requested a variance of 7’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a 9’ by 16’ addition located 93’ from the ordinary high water level. Dan Zierden appeared with the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 7' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a 9’ by 16’ addition located 93’ from the ordinary high water level as described in the variance application dated October 11,2006 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. The Board noted that the proposed development will not increase the overall size of the existing structure and will not obstruct the view from the adjacent properties. Hardship is terrain features of the applicants’ property. Richard and Karen Ressler - Approved the variance as requested. (7:07 p.m.) Richard and Karen Ressler, part of Government Lot 5, Section 32 of Hobart Township by Lake Sybil requested the following: “Initial building project followed variance process due to high water mark and lake setback. This application is in response to having a previous variance granted. Variance granted and dated November 2, 2000. Request to construct addition @ 74’ from lake. Requirement is 100 feet.” The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as described in the variance application dated October 11,2006 and as depicted in the drawing submitted with the variance application. The Board noted that the proposed development is on the backside of the existing dwelling and does not obstruct the view from the adjacent properties. Mark and LoAnn Amundson - Approved a modification to the variance as requested with conditions. (7:15 p.m.) Mark and LoAnn Amundson, Lot 1 Toussaint Heights, Pelican Lake in Scambler Township, requested the following: 1. We would like to build on foundation at sometime in near future. 2. The front of the foundation second floor has been exposed to the weather since the fire. This spring while walking on it I put my foot through the floor. We want to temporarily enclose the front and fix the floor for safety. 3. This is only a temporary enclosure when we actually build on the foundation we will remove enclosure and meet all requirements to build. This includes cutting back the foundation. The variance requested is about 25’ RECEIVED OCT 172006 LAND & RESOURCE WAIVER OF 60-DAY RULE THIS WAIVER MUST BE FILED AND SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE OF LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT BETWEEN OCTOBER & MARCH 1^^ I understand that, due to snow cover, the Planning Commission Members and/or the Board of Adjustment Members may not be able to view my property/project (Tax Parcel described in my dated Application . As a result, it may not be possible for Otter Tail County to meet the legal requirement to take action within 60 days of the receipt of the completed Application(s). I understand that in the absence of a waiver of the 60-Day Requirement, the County may have no alternative but to deny my Application(s). Therefore, I hereby agree to waive the 60-day time limit in order to allow time for the Planning Commission Members and/or Board of Adjustment Members to view the property before taking action on my Application(s). jnlulnk <_^4>R0PERTY OWNER /W/W 7lAtED 11-02-04 Mbowman forms-apps waiver 60 day rule