The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About38000990717000_Variances_03-31-20053-^h^oos OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that„p^ this instrument #—J • — was filed/recorded m this office for record on the_L)—day of2005 atiiji^^mjljm Wendy L.'Metealf^Coutity Rfsporder Ky 11 Dtffltrttr ■ .^Qp/^^recordina fge ~^well certificate 973947 THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us oOXXOApplication Fee 131COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date DAYTIME PHONEc:^/^ V^S L 3 ilobb^ ____ ^l9o\ . lj/iderujcu<l //} ~P( I PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS KbLAKE CLASSLAKE NAMELAKE NUMBER OStin.RANGE TOWNSHIP NAMETOWNSHIPSECTION E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER tnAJM-mO -9°!-Din -noo LEGAL DESCRIPTION Mr\^ei^Loococ! / TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Sewage System Subdivision Ciuster Misc.Structure SizeStructure Setback SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED -A variance for a 32' addition to the west end of the existing home located 64' from the OHWL. -10 feet of the addition will need a variance of 40' from the required OHWL setback of 100*. -22 feet of the addition will need a variance of 36' from the required OHWL setback of 100'. -A variance to extend existing deck, 1 O' at its longest length, triangle shaped, to connect with new door. Existing deck is located 54' from the OHWL. -A variance of 26' from the required OHWL setback of 100' to screen in two sides of existing porch -it would be 74' from the OHWL. I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT RE9ARDING THIS MATTER. signatOreIdf property owner DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) i/i^GO NSd^ '^U>0['-4 4d-6-(^(i?0c5 7^'^ 7^6 "73^ nsi'i fUf 73.^1^ 7S(^^"f ) Ol/ \ i /SfC io3^' /3 '^O (jfU ADate Of Hearing Time /*. V0 /?/n Motion Matt and Brenda Hobbs - Approved (8:40 p.m.) April 7, 2005 Meeting - After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as described in the application dated March 1,2005 and as depicted on the applicant’s drawing with the following conditions as noted in a letter from Tim Griep and Kyle Westergard dated April 5, 2005: 1) No spoils to be placed on the ravine side of the footings, 2) No removal of trees or shrubs outside of the building footprint, and 3) Erosion control fences to be placed on the lake and ravine sides of the project. The Board noted that the proposed development would be no closer to the lake than the existing development. ChaTrman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) (j. No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR LR Official/Date bk 0903-001 315.694 ■ Victor Lundeen Co., Printers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota r GRADE & FILL APPLICATION COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL - LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 121 W JUNIUS SUITE 130, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 218-739-2271 $50.00PERMIT NO.Application Fee Receipt Number ^ M>h6sPROPERTY OWNER 3^^Ad 7^1 / DAYTIME PHONE NUMBER \ i^ts\sIS-01 CLASS Rb MAILING ADDRESS 1,7/y P/.ace CITY, STATE, ZIP SaA "pA-fp/. CA, F/r,kero\LAKE NO. V7/r/^LAKE NAME PARCEL NUMBER(S) POO ^ Oni^ OQO SECTIOM<r^i/ /d TWP NAME ___________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Skc^k / Ltd-l. 'O^^Aujoorl //.i>/\\ - srE-911 PROPERTY ADDRESS 3/ 9^^ ~ J^/ t 'h DATESIGNATUM OR PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT FOR OWNER 'aII GC/^L&R Official DESCRIPTION PROJECT REQUEST BELOW (Provide Scale Drawing On Back) TOTAL CUBIC YARDS !7(zJt ^-f>7/^ S^6nei-f,'// ^o-r ^lopt ^ki/i[ii6A Firof^l-e.a^ov<e c-sfr OrfWaoot/ Tap a-f Sinuuja^ >5 t V — «- V o? f?i£tl3t/)iryQ U/<a//Vu cTTvT^ A/die.f ///^Acd's/opz. £j£.uai>t>A do€.S /Jtde^ceeJ '/ifil bey^>nJ eAf^p/opf/Ay /x)cA/lJar^. U - nBK05/00 305,910 • Victor Lundoen Co., Printers • Fergus Fate, MN • 1-800-346-4870 1 Shovjn grid(s) equals feet, or .inch(es) equals feetScale: /o/" l//ew Please use this sheet for the required scale drawing of your proposal. Be sure to include lot dimension, water frontage, and setbacks from RW, lake, lot lines, sewage system, top of bluff, existing structures and all imper vious surface. Required impervious surface coverage calculation (See definition in Shoreland Management Ordinance) Total Lot Area (FT2) X 100=% Total Impervious Surface Onsite (FT2) Cy<s.tin^PHOPLe VIPW mp/i A\ 0 5'V s~2-'A fropoie<i 1,5 ''co'f'alonj i>3 oPsl^p<. fropoScii^ uid^lPill beA,nd reck. bleU'blOAj I oprop Sl=i__a ^Ci/ ^—j X, o„ -k- L PrQpose.^ AJoT ShouJn.'- pbo\jt ^rc>or\(i &xisiin^ J J posijp/ci.iL vtuiall XX i: exatej >ujoe 1\i •3.V,O Prt^poseJ /'5Vi/fs_»l Vu I1.276') Sco<le, 5 J ^f,iyhVi3 0SSXaX/^z^A/ vie\cj Am5 MB \ \ \ ■ fI II $' I_ Z.era Slope Aftab^e'ki/run'J t 1IWrt ft ffc. c-i'£.J £yi.tst>f\Q ' Slope Unafifeei'eef kyiiiiAo Slopeit ■Vf. Si ^ fi)l ^ ^—euL+ (iT/ll Lnt.Cu-t/<P//Llt)e Snisfln^ Uf.'/t'ty ShedSand firee (zSxio) BSfdHWfit FPffPBsrOHW / ( DatedPr9jC y// April 7, 2005 Page #5 Matt and Brenda Hobbs - Approved (8:40 p.m.) Matt and Brenda Hobbs, Lot 2 Block 1 Denwood Acres First Addition, Pickerel Lake in Maine Township, requested the following: 1) a variance for a 32’ addition to the west end of the existing home located 64’ from the ordinary high water level. 10’ of the addition will need a variance of 40’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and 22' of the addition will need a variance of 36’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’. 2) a variance to extend existing deck, 10’ at its longest length, triangle shaped, to connect with new door. Existing deck is located 54’ from the ordinary high water level. 3.) a variance of 26’from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’to screen in two side of existing porch - it would be 74’ from the ordinary high water level. Randall Mann, Chair, polled the audience with John Bald and Susan Dreis speaking for the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, with.the verbal permission of the application, to table this request until the April 7,-2005 Board of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicants an opportunity to reconsider their plans and to meet on site with Kyle ' Westergard to discuss their development plans. April 7, 2005 Meeting - After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as described in the application dated March 1, 2005 and as depicted on the applicant’s drawing with the following conditions as noted in a letter from Tim Griep and Kyle Westergard dated April 5, 2005: 1) No spoils to be placed on the ravine side of the footings, 2) No removai of trees or shrubs^outside of the building footprint, and 3) Erosion control fences to be placed on the lake and ravine sides of the project. The Board noted that the proposed development would be no closer to the lake than the existing development. Glarification- Kevin Zitzow After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Michael Conlon and unanimously carried, to approve the following: 1) a variahoe of 6’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ and a variance from the road right-of-way setback with aMetter of approval from the township for the placement of a holding tank 4’ from the side lot line and at least 50’ from the ordinary high water level, 2) a variance of 72’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a proposed 7’ 8” by 15’ 5" - screen enclosure located 28’ from the ordinary high water level, and 3) a variance of 65’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 4’ by.5’ roof over an entry door located 35’ from the ordinary high wafer level with the condition that the existing shed must be removed from it present location and either the existing shed or a new shed of equal or lesser size.can be placed in a location which is no closer to the ordinary high water level then the lakeside wall of the main house :and: . must also be placed at least 10’ from the lot line on whichever side of the lot the applicant would choose to place the structure. With no further business, Randall Mann, Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. C uJ.vm.Wayne^ein, Secretary March 31, 2005 Page # 5 Roger, and Kathie Siikey - Denied (8:21 p.m.) Roger and Kathie Siikey, Lot 1 Pancratz Beach, Big Pine Lake in Pine Lake Township, requested a variance of 15’from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ and a variance of 5’ from the , required north property line setback of 10’ for the placement of a structure 60’ from the ordinary high water level and 5’ from the north side lot line. Randall Mann, Chair, polled the audience with no one speaking for dr against the variance as requested. Robert Cavanagh submitted an email and Mike Schultz-and Dennis Kragness submitted letters supporting the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Rod Boyer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested from the required side lot line setback of 10’ as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested. The Board took no action regarding the ordinary high water level setback as that request had been previously approved on December 1, 2004. / Kevin Zitzoyv - Approved as modified and with a condition. (8:31 p.m.) Kevin Zitzow, Lot 10 Lone Pine Beach First Addition, Sybil Lake in Dora Township, requested the following: 1.) a variance of 6’ from the required side lot line setback of 10' and a variance of 27’ 6” from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the placement of a holding tank 4’ from the side lot line and 47’ 6" from the ordinary high water level, 2.) a variance of 72’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a proposed 7’ 8” by 15’ 5" screen enclosure located 28’: from the ordinary high water level, and 3.) a variance of 65’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 4’ by 5’ roof over an entry door located 35’ from the ordinary high water level. Raridall Mann, Chair, polled the audience with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Michael Conldn and unanimously carried, to approve the following: 1) a variance of 6’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ and a variance from the road right-ofrway setback with a letter of approval from the township for the placement of a holding tank 4’ from the side lot line and at least 50’ from the ordinary high water level, 2) a variance of 72’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a proposed 7’ 8" by 15' 5" screen enclosure located 28’ from the ordinary high water level, and 3) a variance of 65’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’for the placement of a 4’by 5’roof over an entry door located 35’from the ordinary high water level with the condition that an existing shed must be place in a location which is no closer to the ordinary high water level then the lakeside wall of the main house and must also be placed at least 10’ from the lot line. Matt and Brenda Hobbs - Tabled (8:45 p.m.) Matt and Brenda Hobbs, Lot 2 Block 1 Denwood Acres First Addition, Pickerel Lake in Maine Township, requested the following: 1) a variance for a 32’ addition to the west end of the existing home located 64’ from the ordinary high water level. 10’ of the addition will need a variance of 40’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 15o’ and 22’ of the addition will need a variance of 36’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’. 2) a variance to extend existing deck, 10’ at its longest length, triangle shaped, to connect with new door. Existing deck is located 54’ from the ordinary high water level. 3.) a variance of 26’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' to screen in two side of existing porch - it would be 74’ from the ordinary high water level. Randall Mann, Chair, polled the audience with John Bald and Susan Dreis speaking for the variance as requested. After consideration and ’’ discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously.carried, with the verbal permission of the application, to table this request until the April 7, 2005 Board of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicants an opportunity to reconsider their plans and to meet on site with Kyle Westergard to discuss their development plans. \i Signature DateScale ! !iSd"T" I ; 1 I ;I ri I 1 !i i iI i i j !f I1 ii 1 \(t I I s ! \n i ! I [ II I I f i i 1 ; / 150 I BK — 0403 313,987 • Victor Lundeen Co., Printers • Fergus Falls, MN • 1-800-346-4870