Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout38000990679000_Variances_07-07-2011DOC# 10946361094636 10?4o36OFFICr. OF CO'JNFV RECORDER OTTER TAIL COUNTY MINNEbOTA Certified, Filed, and/or Recorded .July 2011 ■'0 00 .AM Wendy L. Metcalf. Recorder Fee: $46 00 Well Certit cate ; ] Rec'd ReWi-ned To. LAND & RESOURCE By NDB THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee $400.00 Receipt Number Accepted By / Date _l 701-642-5217 COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK PROPERTY OWNER Robert & Crystal Asche DAYTIME PHONE MAILING ADDRESS 1220 Westmore Ave Wahoeton. ND 58075 LAKE NAME Pickerel LakeLAKE NUMBER 56-475 LAKE CLASS RD TOWNSHIP 134 RANGE__{a MaineSECTION__12 TOWNSHIP NAME PARCEL NUMBER 38-000-99-0331-000 E-911 ADDRESS 33746 N Pickerel Drive Rlchvllle, 38-000-99-0679-000 MN 56576 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONLot Fifteen (15) of Reserve Lot E of Haggstrom's Subdivision of Reserve Lots E and F, of Haggstrom's Beach located in Government Lots Two and Nine (2 & 9) of Section 12-134-41, Otter Tail County, Minnesota and Lot Twenty (20) of Haggstrom Beach Third Addition, being a part of Government Lots Two (2) and Nine (9), Section 12-134-41, Otter Tail County, Minnesota. TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Subdivision ClusterStructure Setback X Structure Size Sewage System Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. Requesting to add a 12'X22.5' screen porch to existing lake home. The proposed addition will be 45' from the OHWL. Asking for a 55' variance, as the required setback is 100 from the OHWL. This new addition meets the requirements of the string-line test, as it will be 12' behind the string-line. Precedence has been established, as a variance was approved on lot next door to the West, with a setback of only 29.5' from the OHWL. I Current home has about 650 square feet of living space, and is simply too small when our family joins us at the lake. I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. /3- ^0/ I SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 7 TimeDate Of Hearing Motion Robert and Crystal Asche - Approved the application as requested with a condition. (8:02 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Paul Larson and carried with Michael Harris voting no, to approve the variance as described in the variance application dated June 13, 2011 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that no more than 25% of the eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It was noted that the variance as approved will provide the applicants with the ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as others in this immediate area. It should also be noted that the variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development. Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No L R Dfficial/Date Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR bk 0407-001 329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota July 7,2011 Page # 4 ^Robert and Crystal Asche - Approved the application as requested with a condition. (8:02 p.m.) Robert and Crystal Asche, Lot 15 of Reserve Lot E of Haggstrom's Subdivision of Reserve Lots E arid F of Haggstrom’s Beach and Lot 20 of Haggstrom Beach Third Addition, Pickerel Lake in Maine Township, requested the following: Requesting to add a 12’ by 22.5’ screen porch to existing lake home. The proposed addition will be 45’ ' from the ordinary high water level. Asking for a 55’ variance, as the required setback is 100’ from the ordinary high water level. This new addition meets the requirements of the string-line test, as it will be 12’ behind the string-line. Precedence has been established, as a variance was approved on lot next door to the West, with a setback of only 29.5’ from the ordinary high water level. Current home has about 650 square feet of living space, and is simply too small when our family joins us at the lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance . as requested. A letter in support of the variance as requested from Erwin and Marilyn Wahlgren, Brad and Kim Pauly, Lowell and Doris Wilcox and Joe and Lori Formaneck was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Paul Larson and carried with Michael Flarris voting no, to approve the . variance as described in the variance application dated June 13, 2011 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that no more than 25% of the eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It was noted that the variance as approved will provide the applicants with the ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as others in this immediate area. It should also be noted that the variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development. Daniel Kasowski - Approved the variance application as requested. (8:10 p.m.) Daniel Kasowski, Lot 16 Block 3 Pelican Beach, Pelican and Duck Lakes in Scambier Township, requested the following: Proposing to construct a 28’ by 30’ detached garage being approximately 127’ from the ordinary high water level of Duck Lake. Requesting a variance of 73’ from required ordinary high water level. The required setback is 200’. Derek Jensen, Contractor appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee and unanirhously carried, to approve a variance of 73’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the construction of a 28’ by 30’ detached garage being 127’ frorn the ordinary high water level of Duck Lake. The applicant noted that the existing 8’ by 16’ shed will be removed once the new structure has been completed. The applicant’s practical difficulty is the terrain and the underground creek. It was also noted that there is a county road between the applicant’s property and Duck Lake. Jonathan & Michelle Freeland - Approved the application as requested with a condition. (8:15 p.m.) Jonathan and Michelle Freeland, part of Government Lot 8, Section 4 of Friberg Township by Tonseth Lake, requested the following: Below are the reasons we are requesting a 100’ structure setback and a 75’ to 100’ septic sewer setback from the ordinary high water line on Tonseth Lake. Lake reclassification. We purchased and platted this lot in 2003. Until 2 years ago, this lot had an ideal location for building our dream home 100’ from the.ordinary high water level. Now Tonseth Lake has been reclassified from a Recreational Lake with a 100’ structure setback to a Natural Environment Lake with a 200’ structure setback. We understand that this was done on all lakes In Otter Tail ' less than 150 acres; however, Tonseth Lake is listed at 156 Acres on the DNR 1999 web site. Terrain Topography issues. Setting the house 200’ from the ordinary high water level would eliminate a good home building site. 100’ from the ordinary high water level is the highest point on the lot. The lot slopes down fast from the 100’ to the 200’ from the ordinary high water level. There is a large wetland about 400’ from the ordinary high water level which has water a good portion of the summer and would be detrimental to building close to it. Septic tank issue: Placing the septic tank closer to the wetland would also be a drainage issue. The neighborhood has been developed when it was a 100’setback. Glenn Freeland represented the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Michael Harris made a motion, seconded Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as described in the variance application dated June 15, 2011 and as depicted in the drawings submitted with the variance application with the condition that no part of the area proposed for development is within the bluff impact zone or within the required bluff setback area. The applicants’ practical difficulties are terrain, topography and wetland features of this property. It was also noted that the area proposed for development will not obstruct the view from the adjacent properties, and any runoff from the proposed development will go towards the wetland and not the lake. ■V ; I 6/13/2011 h Otter Tail County Land & Resource Management Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment I understand that Robert and Crystal Asche are requesting a variance to thelffO foot setback requirement to add a screen porch to their lake home. This letter is to inform you that I support approval of such variance. 33728 N Pickerel Drive' Erwin & Marilyn Wah^enti. Brad & Kim P^uly 33740 N Pickerel Drive ■■v;I 4^4Lowell & Dons Wilcox 33790 N Pickerel Drive 33728 N Pickerel Drive& Lori Formaneck ; i ■; c SCALE DRAWING FORM» ■i ynod‘1^ CS3I aoci /sS' <>oo9.?a C,-l^aoc\ Tax P^el Number(s)/^' The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotiines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must identify the type, size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-way(s), ordinary high water ievel(s), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), biuff(s) & wetland(s). Must also include all proposed topographical alterations. I ^ H i .■?() ^ Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) %Scale --------^6 I 3©ie>’^ ■ A 9l> -4: f I 4r Q) q 'dVq- oecK jlXliu; J! 4 f^i £ K*=- r Q L^’ L 1^f! Signature of Property Owner □ate 329.086 • Victor Lundnn Co. Piiolon • Fotsuo Falla. MN ■ 1-800-346.4870BK — 0207 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): Ft^ Ou>e.ly f Slcp£ bccK , t«.Ke /355Structure(s); Bctci y-' o^ uFt2Deck(s): Ft2Driveway(s): J) i'4i' oy\<s>ic>Ft2/ pr-opo.^Patio(s): ^ /-Ft2Sidewalk(s): Ft2Stairway(s): Ft2Retaining Wall(s); Ft2Landscaping; (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 1 yi.ncy Ft2 ^ ih ^nf) = .O V 2 C? X100 = LOT AREA: rlU> O LcP .% LOT AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOTOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE