Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout38000990593000_Variances_08-05-20101083577 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA 1 hereby certify that XUoo3 r » this instrument #---------------;-------- was filed/recorded in this office for record on the__i------2010 at_4J]^(^pm well certified THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee Pmj 'I'H'iD 3 - sP . /H ochl\c^^cl, aJ COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INKI Receipt Number _ Accepted By / Date DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER 5MAILING ADDRESS /^6 lake name PuJiJlirc^P f2JC>LAKE CLASSLAKE NUMBER /l/j1}L RANGE TOWNSHIP NAMETOWNSHIP 3S'occmoss'f cco^^9000^ C^T^OOO SECTION X ? 2-2373 S! rcUuJCcJE-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ^ /I j I -1 . - 0^^ I TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Misc.Subdivision ClusterSewage SystemStructure SizeStructure Setback SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIF CATION. . UVS Co erv^ <h L^^(o , L^v4-^ * I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE^ANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. 2 Z DATESIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) fj I ^0/Date Of Hearing Time Motion Cory Klostriech - Denied. (7:29 p.m.) August 5, 2010 meeting - Sara Klostriech was also present at the hearing. The audience was polled with Danwin Krause seeking clarification/information regarding the applicant’s variance request. Also, an additional individual spoke regarding the need for a survey to determine both the lot line and the location of an existing garage. After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, seconded by Steve Schierer and carried with Thomas Lee abstaining, to table, with the applicant’s verbal permission, the hearing on this variance application until the October 7, 2010 Board of Adjustment meeting to provide the applicant with an opportunity to have the property surveyed and to consider possible other alternatives. September 2, 2010 meeting - Prior to the public hearing the applicant submitted an email requesting that his hearing be tabled until the October meeting of the Board of Adjustment. October 7, 2010 meeting - Prior to the meeting the applicant contacted the Otter Tail County Auditor’s office, by phone, to request that his variance hearing be continued until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment. November 4, 2010 meeting - After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate practical difficulty/hardship had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variai decision. as requested and there was not enough information presented to the Board to allow them to make an informed Chktfman/dtter Tail County Board of ^justment^ Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR LR Official/Date bk 0106-001 V. Lundeen 324855 November 4, 2010 Page # 2 Claudia Engelstad - Variance approved as requested. (6:51 p.m.) Claudia Engelstad, Lot 3 Block 1 Engstrom Beach First Additioni: West McDonald Lake in Edna Township, requested the following; Requesting a variance.of 6T from the standard.ordinary high water level. The normal structure setback being 100 feet. For the purpose of adding a second story to an existing dwelling. Existing dwelling is located 39’feet from the ordinary high water level.. Jay Pepple, Architect, appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the: variance as requested. After consideration and , discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Thomas. Lee and carried with Randall Mann arid Steve.Schierer,: voting no, to approve the variance as-requested in the application dated October 14, 2010 and as depicted on the drawings submitted with the application. The variance as approved only grants a variance from the ordiriary high water level setback-requirement and does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance for the proposed development. It was noted that the proposed development will keep impervious surface coverage under 25%, decrease the existing footprint and place the existing deck in compliance with the side lot line setback requirement. Mike and Mona Johnson - Tabled (7:12 p.m.) Mike and Mona Johnson, Lots 10 and 11 Meyers Second Addition, West McDonald Lake in Dora Township, requested a variance of 14’ from the top of a narrow bluff - being 16’ from top of bluff. Required setback is 30’. Proposed garage is to abut the toe of bluff. There was general discussion regarding this application; however, prior to the hearing date the applicants verbally requested that their application be tabled until a later date. James Joel McElhany Tst - Variance approved as requested with conditions. (7:15 p.m.) James Joel McElhanyTst, Lot T-12 Moltzan Survey Lots of Government Lot 7, Section 16 of Candor Township by Leek/Trowbridge Lake, requested the following: Impervious surface calculated at 26.4%, versus 25% allowable. Structure built 1972 before or rather after October 15, 1971. Tax records show 1®' taxes paid 1973. Original owner purchased lot in October 1967. Per phone conversation - requesting a variance to replace existing boathouse with new structure same size and use as original structure in same non-conforming location. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Emails in support of the applicant proposed development from Corey and Ericka Peterson and E.M. and Marian Tuomala in support of the variance as requested were read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and carried with Paul Larson and Randall Mann voting no, to approve the variance as requested in the application dated October 8, 2010 with the following conditions: 1.) no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces and 2.) before any work is started the Land and Resource Department must take pictures and measurements of the existing boathouse to assure that the new structure is the same size and shape. Cory Klostriech - Denied. (7:29 p.m.) Cory Klostriech, Lot 1 Birchwood Shores First Addition and Lot 6 Birchwood Shores Second Addition, Pickeral Lake in Maine Township, requested the following: Split Lot 1 Birchwood Shores First Addition from Lot 6 Birchwood Shores Second Addition and to declare each lot bulldable for single family residential use. Lot 5 Birchwood Shores Second Addition had a year round home established four years ago. Note - Garage on Lot 1 is about 2’ over property line to Lot 6. Lot 6 is the largest substandard back lot, I believe on Birchwood Shore Second Addition, with nothing on it. August 5, 2010 meeting - Sara Klostriech was also present at the hearing. The audience was polled with Darwin Krause seeking clarification/information regarding the applicant’s variance request. Also, an additional individual spoke regarding the need for a survey to determine both the lot line and the location of an existing garage. After consideration and discussion, Randal! Mann made a motion, seconded by Steve Schiererand carried with Thomas Lee abstaining, to table, with the applicant’s verbal permission, the hearing on this variance application until the October 7, 2010 Board of Adjustment meeting to provide the applicant with an opportunity to have the property surveyed and to consider possible other alternatives. September 2, 2010 meeting - Prior to the public hearing the applicant submitted an email requesting that his hearing be tabled until the October meeting of the Board of Adjustment. October 7, 2010 meeting - Prior to the meeting the applicant contacted the Otter Tail County Auditor’s office, by phone, to request that his variance hearing be continued until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment. November 4, 2010 meeting - After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate practical difficulty/hardship had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and there was not enough information presented to the Board to allow them to make an informed decision. J..-1r-;,11-I.i.t 3%000^<?65i9aocaM/)ocmo‘i5iax>Tax Parcel Number(s) rThe scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must identify the type, size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-way(s), ordinary high water level(s), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also include all proposed topographical alterations. I ■ I/ ~ 10 % Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) Scale m tI I.Lj-■i..L j |,.„4 __ T s■.i. ■ ( Not t f--i-f-i 1. I[I 1l M1M\it [■4) 1:1:::-I-I.. I .:i.I .. J..ii.::3io':t r■4=n-t- ! I - i4 ,.l,I.....1 I ITi I....i.,□rj".....L.. I !1 1i t I -"[/rfmI-..""IIl_i ::::tr 7W I -I--,1,[i[ 10rI J t iwj*>.Hre t 1 > ■t taila ...1.N:•" I iJ*4 I1A.I .1 f.m.i -SS:I1T..L e»-l.jI ?! i [ I r!I :::ifZ !!I4Ii -i-.-...-..I...1.1 Tt:I I !4I■4 J. ::c: .1. .-1.T 4±t ......r-I ..f tt'I itr p.1.::t ;J..I. WWWr Date -h/“H t t ' mIp.i:1 j Sighature of Property jOwnW 1 r.......1 ■ -----------r'l..........[ I I-f 329lo86-»...Victor-Lundeon.Co!I' [BK —0207 Falls. MN -•-...1-800-346-U870Printers Fergus T i:1.!.I iI i HI f i4-t [I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: , List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces fmust be shown on scale drawing) 0rFt2Deck(s): 3^00 ^ Ft2Driveway(s): 0[^Ft2Patio(s): Ft2Sjdewalk(s); Ft2Stairway(s): Ft2Retaining Wall(s): Ft2Landscaping: (Plastic B^rier) Other:Ft2 Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: / '7000 Ft2LOT AREA: Z'^fof/ 7fOOQ /.%X100 = IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREATOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE