The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About37000991002000_Variances_11-07-2002'915793 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA 915793 i I hereby certify that this instrument #_ was filed/recorded in this office for record on the I ^ day of 2002 atw'./Yramjipm Wendy L. Metcalf^ County Recorder bv: recording f well certificate THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739-2271 Ext. 225 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee 00 COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK tMyiUA^Lai/IAAhaylSAn accepted By/Dale8’fe6r 'la. Receipt Number ggifyi IZ) L^hAJL S’tO/iOO, KlO 5t)l 03 PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE MAILING ADDRESS (hDLlzLt_Sn-1'41LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME LAKE CLASS icdiL^33.SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME I^CL. n^dil'dCtut \Tj _ _ . , A PARCEL NUMBER 3riD(yD E-911 ADDRESS tlAUMT LEGAL DESCRIPTION f I TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure Setback Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Misc.Cluster SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. Qu^ilm &Lk^i Pi 205ZhI SIGNATURE OF PROP^TY OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) Ajf i a^-^7__Uf 6 99d 9^9 /ooo / A o / .fe-'v tcfn.-fcj / > ?77 f7<? ,'C-'97fi'.I- •. %/0-ic. 5A '/ cA0^\(9.ju,a^ 9tf /oo 7 oLu^jn ■ n'] lAA) /\/oJerr>Li^Date Of Hearing Time Motion Estate of Arthur L. Christianson - Approved with conditions. (6:56 p.m.) Motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to approve the permanent attachment of the westerly 105’ of Lot 1, Block 1, Stony Bar Estates, to Lot 26, Block 1, Stony Bar Estates, with the condition that the westerly 105’ of Lot 1, Block 1, Stony Bar Estates cannot be used for the placement of a dwelling and to approve the permanent attachment of the remain portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Stony Bar Estates to Lot 27, Block 1, Stony Bar Estates with the condition that the existing older structure on Lot 1, Block 1, must be removed. ••7 ... Cnairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment -i ' _ .................................................... Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management ....Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) I No A7hL R Officiai/Date Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR BK-0402-001 309,424 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota i ■ • .'.-•'7 ' . l®rtmberS,W-- Page 2. Caryn and Greg Tauer-Approved proposed project with conditions. (6:38 p.m.) Caryn and Greg Tauer, Golden Valley, MN requested a variance of 54’ from the required ordinary high water leve setback of 75’ and a variance of 16.5’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 37.5’ for the lifting of an existing cabin and for the placement of either a slab or footing 21 ’ from the ordinary high water level. It should be noted that the cabin substructure is settling and rotting. The proposed project calls for the replacement of rotten joists, plates, decking, studs and siding. It was also noted that the cabin would be placed in the same location bu' perhaps raised 1 or 2’. The property is described as the East 25’ of Lot 6 and the west half of Lot 7, William Reese’s Lakeshore, Rush Lake in Rush Lake Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration and discussion, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to approve the applicants’ proposed project as stated in the variance applicatio with the condition that the repaired structure must be placed at least 37.5’ from the ordinary high water level and must be placed at least 10’ of the side lot lines. It was noted that the variance as approved is consistent with past actions of the Board of Adjustment. Gary and Audrey Erdmann - Approved as requested. (6:53 p.m.) Gary and Audrey Erdmann, Dent, MN, requested a variance of 139’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ and a variance of 39’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 100’ for the placement of a [ by 24’ addition on the west side of the existing dwelling 6T from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lots 23, 24, and 25, Block 1, Brightwood Shoreline, Dead Lake in Star Lake Township. The audienc was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration and discussion, motion was made jy Cecil Femling, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously earned, to approve a variance of 139’ from the ■equired ordinary high water level setback of 200’ and a variance of 39’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 100' for the placement of a 9’ by 24’ addition on the west side of an existing dwelling 61’ from the ordinary high water level. It should be noted that the proposed addition would be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure. It was also noted that the variance as approved is consistent with past actions of the Board of Adjustment. of Arthur L. Christianson - Approved wiffi conditions. (6:56 p.m.) d Estate of Arthur L. Christianson, CIO Sandra L. Elton, Fargo, ND, requested a variance tb split Lot iTBTock 1 of Stony Bar Estates into two pieces, attaching the easterly portion of Lot 1, Block 1 to Lot 27, Block 1, resulting in a single lot with one building site on Lot 27. The westerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1, will be approximately 105 feet in width, and will be attached to either Lot 2, Block 1 or to Lot 26, Block 1. If attached to Lot 2, Block 1, the combiner property would be suitable for one single-family residence. If the westerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1, were attached to Lot 26, Block 1, the combined property would be suitable for one residence. The approximate location of the dividing line is shown on the applicant’s drawing. Lots 26 and 27 are currently in separate ownership, and Lots 1, 2, 26 and 27 are ail cumently separate buildable lots. The net result of granting the variance will be to eliminate one of these building sites. A surveyor’s drawing will be provided at the time of recording. The property is described as Lot 1, Stony Bar Estates, Lake Lida in Lida Township. The audience was polled with no one speakinc for or against the request. After consideration and discussion, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously earned, to approve the permanent attachment of the westerly 105’ of Lot 1, Block 1, Stony Bar Estates, to Lot 26, Block 1, Stony Bar Estates, with the condition that the westerly 105’ of Lot 1, Block 1. Stony Bar Estates cannot be used for the placement of a dwelling and to approve the permanent attachment of the remain portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Stony Bar Estates to Lot 27, Block 1, Stony Bar Estates with the condition that he existing older structure on Lot 1. Block 1, must be removed. - • ^ ^ \ \j.i iT. LOT 2 =iCecoftGOV 7 3 t•GOV'T. lot 3 - govt, lot 4 - = 26.5 +Total ACRES OFH* U OF COUNTY RIiCORnNK i ■ u .t;’ ' f Otter Tall, Minnesota I hri'i.-l-;.•»-liy that 1 have coniporecl Ui Aiueut with the olrijiuul Inhirumi No.now on file In my office, a li.i.i .1 ii .rue ontl correct copy of the ean 2.„. Coui'.:>' ,‘{.:c(irdl , Ifeput 5E2.8> NOT 0.69198299-22-->«::v:§V2 /I ! SMte of Minnesota County of On this. Robsonally appearedthe foregoi.executed and deed.free act « ■ NO Permission is requested to split Lot 1, Block 1 of Stony Bar Estates into two pieces, attaching the easterly portion of Lot 1, Block 1 to Lot 27, Block 1, resulting in a single lot with one building site on Lot 27. The westerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1, will be approximately 105 feet in width, and will be attached to either Lot 2, Block 1, or to Lot 26, Block 1. If attached to Lot 2, Block 1, the combined property would be suitable for one single family residence. If the westerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1, is attached to Lot 26, Block 1, the combined property would be suitable for one residence. The approximate location of the dividing line is shown on the attached detail of the plat map. Lots 26 and 27 are currently in separate ownership, and Lots 1, 2, 26, and 27 are all currently separate buildable lots. The net result of granting the variance will be to eliminate one of these building sites. A surveyor’s drawing will be provided at the time of recording.