Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout37000280151012_Variances_11-02-1995783485 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM Receipt No.OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA <-/A-y4~ /)y A/300Application Fee $ Rfsf Middle /? /^ E A/ QSS/o-A- street S No. city State A--/ /) A- Pttoo^. Cf^/) -7 j C ftPFS - CZr/yJ c^<5 Owner; Last Name Zip No. 5i?- 7^7 Lake Name Lake ClassLake No. /3Cr>Sec. Twp.Range Twp. Name 2g- /S(^ /^/J-TvSoaJ L^e>7~^ £>/^ ^ >h^ 7S'' Z./C Legal Description:^ ^3’3’y /Fire No. or Lake ID # y-c!LK&^5-7X 73--- ^ /3T>/ ^7-Qjio- ;iS-Parcel Number VARIANCE REQUESTED IS: l//h</A^^Cl^ tP 7- ys^ /=o^ /^AXyr J%e ffyi o Poe -A-0i)/r/ 5> c_T^K"e /) 7~/ ^ ^ c^&~pp7~^ ^o/h^ . pfe<^e.^TiY (A^P^co/:) 7~^fr\ UJ /77\ p iT'e-^n'T ‘57?2_l<_cT"ol/^S/ L./ Kl (f* In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter TailI understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirement County. C 1Q . XApplication dated Signature Of Applicant P. M19//- 2Date of hearing:. Time: MOTION AS FOLLOWS: CoveAi e..Chairman '' Otter Tail County Board of AdjustmentXYESNOPermitfs) from Land & Resource Management required: Hhk.r^mailed copy of Application to Applicant. (Date/Initial) MKL - 0483-001 258.371 — Victor Lundwn Co., Printers. Fergus Falls, Minnesota > • \j \■ > \^CdjBu> \ / S' / - foo YS/-003 ^ dup'{ S’ ^ du^■■; / 2 1 W\ f i V ' ' HIS - m/f i. :i \ i i ' .* (H■\. V'^•'Gfrice of County Recorder ■ County of Otter Tail I hereby certiiy thst th;; 'vitisin insUument was i:!ed- for record in ihir, offrif un the ^ aiid W3S ouiy Microfilmed as ,: ^M.\ .aI'ouiUy Recorfler ............ Ooptdy1 Motion was made by Cecil Femiing, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of approximately 45' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' and a variance of approximately 7.5' from the required shore impact zone setback of 37.5' for the addition of a bay window to an existing structure approximately 30' from the ordinary high water level and a variance of 6' from the required side lot line setback of 10' for the construction of an addition to an existing structure 4' from the side lot line with the provision that the(^two^tall storage buildings must be removed from the front lot to the rear of the back lot. It should be noted that the bay window will be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing overhang and that the addition will be no closer to the side lot line than the existing structure. The addition will be in line with the present structure.; i