Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout37000270143003_Variances_12-05-1996APPLICATION FOR VARIANCEOffin ol County Recorder County of Otter Tall I hereby certify thal the within InsIrumenI was Hied tor record in this olfice on the__A.D.19at and was duly Micrordmed as Doc.i Otter Tail County Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 (218) 739-2271 TSf’hOoO .dayol M. County Recorder ______Deputy — Ptoaso Complete With Black Ink — Last Nams ^ F^t ^ Mktdh » /e*‘/ Au/.J(’0 street A No ^ Qty '^ete ' * ZbWa ^ Q ^ Lake Name________ \ c/// ^7-AIC^Owner;Phone: CrS-Lake No.Lake Class /SLSec.Twp.Range Twp. Name Legal Description:Fire No. or Lake ID 0 S'?- o^z3-oooParcel Number VARIANCE REQUESTED IS: % .P,(!U:UUc^Z^ £jiJ(uL , :^d' ^UaJMv X ^ ' QwccJU!tMA'- OjXIAxLA- \UuAltLj^ &CX$(p ^ d ^4:S7f,/y In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary inlormatlon as possible, such as: maps, plans, Information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tall County. 7J ]4 19 aApplication dated S/gnafui />carrf 19_9i/>?• i>/ ^ MDate of hearing: _____ MOTION AS FOLLOWS: . Time: Motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Cecil Femling, to table the variance request for additional infomiation concerning fee ownership of the property in question. After additional discussion the previous motion was rescind and the following motion was offered by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as the current property owner was not interested in pursuing either the requested variance or in having the requested variance tabled for additional information. Skr^-0 Chairman Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment PermH(8) from Land A Resource ^nagement required:Yes NO mailed copy of Application to Applicant,(Date/Initial) • K 07SB-001 }77,20S * Victer lundatfi Co Printort • F«rgu« Fsili MihAOtOfO Marie Rogers - Approved Marie Rogers, Perham, MN, requested a variance to subdivide a 2.5 acre parcel and a 2.8 acre parcel from an existing 72.25 acre parcel. Subdivisions containing wetlands or within the shoreland area have a minimum size requirement of 5 acres. The property is described as part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter, Section 31 of Pine Lake Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by George Walter, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance to subdivide a 2.5 acre parcel and a 2.8 acre parcel from an existing 72.25 acre parcel with the condition that a registered surveyor’s drawing must be provided and with the condition that no additional variances will be granted to these two parcels for the placement/location of any structures, wells or septic systems. Clifford Erickson - Denied Clifford Erickson, Pelican Rapids, MN, requested a variance to convey a parcel of less than 5 acres without a registered surveyor’s drawing. The parcel would be approximately 50' by 105’ by 123' and would be permanently attached to an adjacent lake lot owned by Arnold Shirley. The property is described as part of Government Lot 2, Section 27 of Lida Township by Lake Lida. Charles Krekelberg, Attorney, represented Mr. Clifford Erickson at the hearing. The audience was polled with Jerry Erickson addressing the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Cecil Femling, to table the variance request for additional information concerning fee ownership of the property in question. After additional discussion the previous motion was rescind and the foilowing motion was offered by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as the current property owner was not interested in pursuing either the requested variance or in having the requested variance tabled for additional information. Clyde William Miilerbernd - Tabied Clyde William Miilerbernd, St. Paul, MN, requested a variance of 9’ from the required top of bluff setback of 30’ for the placement of a 12’ by 60' deck 2T from the top of the bluff. The property is described as part of Government Lot 2, Section 2 of Nidaros Township by East Battle Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to table the variance request until the April-1997 Board of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicant an opportunity to consider other building aiternatives. The applicant has provided a letter requesting the tabling of his request until the April 1997 meeting. It was noted that since the applicant's property is currently undeveloped it would be in the best interest of everyone to consider any alternatives possible that would permit the development of this property without the need for any variances or at the very least to permit development that would not require a variance from the bluff impact zone. Ronald E. Werner - Approved Ronald E. Werner, West Fargo, ND, requested a variance of approximately 55 to 60' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for an addition to an existing dwelling approximately 40 to 45' from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lot 10, East Shore, Tamarac Lake in Scambler Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to allow the applicant to use the string line in the shore impact zone for the construction of an addition to an existing dwelling. Based on the applicant's testimony the proposed addition will not exceed the string line. The use of the string line will place the addition approximately 40 to 45' from the ordinary high water level and will allow the applicant the ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as currently enjoyed by the applicant’s contiguous property owners. WARRANTY PEBP.Form No.Ioowio puouomw oo.. wtw ulm, mmm». MlaacnU CnlfonB CoaviqraDdBc Blaokiladlvidoal to IndtrUnol i .1Made this___^Lir:^_____________day of__1JInicniur<, between..Gii.i..?.E.QBB._B."....S.R.I.C.KSQN,..ajid...H^2£Jj_ERLC.K5.QN..___.b.!As.b,ajiji._3ii.4...wi.£e.j^ W.80.. of the County of.......Qt te r„..Tail....... port_.ifi5._o/ the firet part, and_____A&MQLD_.J1_-.SUXRLEY............ JMLinae.S-Q.tja..and State of. ...P.t.t.er...Tail_______and State of._____Mi.n.n.e..s.Q.t.a.of the County of. paTt..}f.___of the second part,WUnesseth, That the said part.^.P.^. QN£...J]QLLAJLAND...aiHER_CQQIl_ANn_VALUAaLE_.CONSlDERA.TlQM__-.._.2JOti^R5, in hand paid by the said part....y.^_______of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby hereby Grant, Bargain, Sell, and Convey unto the said part....y.......of the or parcel.... and State of Minnesota, of the first part, in consideration of the sum of...... to....tJiem acknowledged, do.&s... second part,...........his- of land lying and being in the County of. heirs and assigns. Forever, all the tract...Q.t.te.r....T.ai.JL described as follows, to-wit; That part of Government Lot 2, Section 27, Tovmship 136, Range 42 West described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Government Lot 2, thence on an assumed bearing due North along the East line thereof 603.5 feet, thence running South 83° West a distance of 400.3 feet to the point of beginning: ! Thence South 83° West a distance of 50 feet, thenceS 7° East to the North boundary line of the dedicated road of KLIX BAY, thence South­easterly along said boundary line to a line projected' - South 7°East the point of beginning, thence/in a straight line to the pointnortherly from of beginning. of?. ..'i /5 f/j4hA\ \ To Have and to Hold the Same, Together with'all the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to the said part. heirs and assigns. Forever, And the said.------Cliffard...D, -Ericlcs.OH_.an.d..Jjaxel..£xickson ,...................................................................hu5b.and...and...wife. i of the second part,. .part._JL.fi5_ of the first part, /or..tJiein5elves.r--their..... with the said part_y.......of the second part,... .they...5Xe....weU seized in fee of the lands and premises aforesaid, and ha.yie.. good right to sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are free from all incumbrances. heirs, executors and administrators, do. ......lLi5.covenant heirs and assigns, that except those of record. State Deed Tax Stamps due hereon of $2.20. And the above bargained and granted lands and premises, in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said part......y.....of the second part,............hi.S. persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, subject to incumbrances, if any, hereinbefore mentioned, the said part_i.fi5..o/ the first part will Warrant and Defend. heirs and assigns, against all J ;In Tejtimon7 Whereof, The said part...X&S.....of the first part ha..y.e.hereunto «et....th.fi.i.C._ hand._S__the day and year first above written.I COUNTY OF OTTER TAS. STATE OF MINNESOTA DEED TAX NUMBER .1 DATE ! !