The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08000990284000_Variances_06-05-2008<^-S'-200S OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA was filed/lrecorded in this office for record on theJOf h dav of^ 2008 at^ Wendy Metcaif„Cpunte R bv; ^/. /yL rhiL recording fee ^weii certificate 1040162 T7/J/11 [pm ler .Deputy L'A THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER ^.....MAY Q540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 MAY 0 6 2008'^' ^ (218) 998-8095 ,j,;rj Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us ^3,10.oC Application Fee (15 0.ig-gin -q06q COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date Sco'l")' \?i6r^lO 2.‘q1d uo\t a DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 1— OO O /<e51^-523 ______LAKE CLASS ^ C<^nJor LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME V/3¥/3'7 TOWNSHIP NAMESECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE ‘~f^iS0 SLi nRoo^cf0^-000 -^<7 - o3i^H-ooo E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION- L^OOcP >L/iSfor^ ~ L-tfOY\/.O -i’ ^ (Please Check)TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED structure Setbacl^^Cluster Misc.Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. , ‘>P Se4b,rc^s.^ X awi for XO' Vari<,nC€4-0 A-Ke XO I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. ^F PR(SIGNATURE F PROPERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) '7 *^^ frOTimeDate Of Hearing UU'C\^ i Motion Scott and LuAnn Vigen - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (7:08 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of an 18’ by 20’ shop 0’ from the road right- of-way as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It was noted the proposed development will be improvement over the location of the existing structure which is in the road right-of-way. an/(5tfer Tail County Board of Adju^fmChWent Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No '/j2MCopy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR Official/Date bk 0407-001 329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company. Fergus Falls. Minnesota June 5,2008 Page #2 Gary Schroeder - Withdrawn Gary Schroeder, part of Government Lot 1, Section 10 of Elizabeth Township by Long Lake, requested a variance of 20' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for new construction (entry and stairway) 80’ from the ordinary high water level. A letter from Shirley and Willis Stelter in support of the variance as requested was noted for the record. On June 3, 2008 the Secretary of the Board of Adjustment received a phone call from Mr. Gary Schroeder noting that his plans had changed and that he was withdrawing his variance application. Scott and LuAnn Vigen - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (7:08 p.m.) Scott and LuAnn Vigen, Lot 8 Elmwood Subdivision, Loon Lake in Candor Township, requested a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of an 18’ by 20’ shop 0’ from the road right-of-way (on the property line). The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of an 18’ by 20’ shop 0’ from the road right-of-way as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It was noted the proposed development will be improvement over the location of the existing structure which is in the road right-of-way. Arlin and Bonnie Henkelman - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (7:13 p.m.) Arlin and Bonnie Henkelman, Lots 7 and 8 Philip Burseth Beach, Wall Lake In Dane Prairie Township, requested the following: We would like to replace our existing variance fora 16’ by 72’ manufactured home, 51’ from shoreline to a ■ 28’ by 52’ approximately 47’ from the ordinary high water level as we feel it would be a more positive appearance. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Karen Iverson appeared with the appiicants at the public hearing. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to approve the location and size of the new dweliing as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces and with the condition that the propose garage cannot exceed 780 square feet. Darle and Melva Miller-Tabled (7:25 p.m.) Darle and Melva Miller, Lots 41 and 42 Block 1 Crystal Beach, West McDonald .Lake in Dora Township, requested a variance of 13’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a dwellirig 7’ from the road : right-of-way, a variance of 50’ from the required ordinary.high water level setback of 100’ for a 36’ by 60’ irregular shape addition 50’ from the ordinary high water level and variance of 56’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 10’ by 24’ deck 44’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled . with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from the Dora Towns'Board of Supervisors in opposition to the variance as requested was read for the record. At the hearing it was noted that the variance from the road right-of-way would be 14’ instead of 13’. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to table with the verbal permission of the applicant, this variance application hearing until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the appiicants with an opportunity to review there proposed development with the Dora Town Board of Supervisors. Bruce Melin and Kathryn M. Kenna - Denied. (7:40 p.m.) Bruce Melin and Kathryn M. Kenna, part of Government Lot 6, Section 26 of Candor Township by Loon Lake, requested a variance of 25’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the location of a structure 75’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from Leslie Sass in support of the development'as proposed was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Carl Ziqk made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property and/or practical difficulties had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and noting that the applicants can obtain a reasonable use of their property, without the granting of the variance as requested as the applicants have a large lot that would appear to have other suitable building.locations that would meet the required setback from the ordinary high water level. !♦ ■ t ^1. > ■ 1 : . ..i'•v.' SCALE DRAWING FQRM _■■■_■-. lira -v.r:. 'ns- ooo-H^ -oss^-ooo ■ ■'■* ■ W^mmTax Parcel Number(s)ALAND F^aSDUKCE The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and rr^tjid^i^^e size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-waJfsi^jidir^itf^jLlL/ water leveKs), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), blutf(s) & wetland(s). Must also include all proposed topographical alterations. MAY 0 1 2008 (Ar;L'i,’‘R!;SUURCfImpervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) Scale 76' i 1 I ^ p^opoS^cfi I 8 > 3LD (3(^0 tfiJ3 IV. 1 ; 16 c>> C4 I5 cv \ 'I<y I103 1 . - - i- (fil-S ! I I 2lV' ( DUAXe Ci^hivnefY *f»2i Cio s: J ?-fr T SSif^oC +S4cf)< (28? ^ 34 i ' iN 1 1i ' '1/fj s I 7 . I—//-t-|J_- Ffirv\v ftvocir5 , u.v,u <»(£ h&a\jrr ; i t ;^7 !cs3 'V Gq*: >4|xa-\D& ' Dateii^ature^iT PropOT^PW^^ BK —020^ij086 • Victor Lundeen Co. Printers • Fergus Falls. MN • 1-600'346-4870 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing^: Ft2Structure(s): MO Ft2Deck(s): Ft2Driveway(s): Ft2Patio(s): Ft2Sidewalk(s); Ft2Stairway(s): Ft2Retaining Wall(s); Ft2Landscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 /'70'?Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: nioo FPLOT AREA: /ni^n . nioo , .QHta X100 =.% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREATOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE -l-k« fat^oLon<\^ Sc\v''^^ce. Tov4voS, will \ Us t buiUirij X'ocfhJ) UockS op' LuoiiKiu<x^ on Af 1(0II(1)tCL (iH'i-iO}I 2 P-Ljd -tEl O ^ V'' C06Ll|CLc3CLy^On or\ of" Ofcic--4 ^ PlAsr/c e^v'ner olk/pp lo^krUL arooncP 4-Kt Sou4-'i, vo^!.f,AiiT^ Wor-LV Si(te oF c^loin. V'J>KoLL^-n, 'n -FKt. 5c«l'ec!2 r^iT,c;c^. r/icWill ^ f ^ ^ Ao6ur7 V\0 0 o