HomeMy WebLinkAbout08000360270001_Variances_06-05-2008OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA
•hereby certifythis instrument# ' " ^
was filed/recorded in this office
for record on the JC\1h dav of
77/7/? C 2008 at^ V'^^om
Wend)^ Metcalf CMn^ Recorder
bv: Tylg/^z-y -/y. ^ Deputy
A) rh >6. recording fee
J weii certificate
1040170
L'X
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER
540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 998-8095
Otter Tail County’s Website; www.co.ottertail.mn.us
37 cApplication Fee _
Receipt Number _______________
Accepted By / Date ^
/ V «poCOMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK
11 ^ .K<
la It? Sasjs-^. J np, S8a.o|
t. Q1/-^
£DAYTIME PHONE 7 O I ~ 7 ^ ^ ^PROPERTY OWNER ^-UC-g
MAILING ADDRESS
LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME
SECTION ^ Lo> TOWNSHIP / 5^ RANGE ^ /
1? DLAKE CLASS
rpi c(TOWNSHIP NAME OJC
PARCEL
NUMBER
E-911
ADDRESS
V/er<^cA& /T\ n
Q ^OQo 3^p^g^'?<jrtc>i
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
S«cf Tiop / 5>?fC« H
3.iiOAC
P*+ (rLfo CoH CcK Lc+ 1
0<X<^ Kok s , ^ 7 3' JS, /!/HCi-
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
K structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc.Structure Setback
SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS
THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION.
5 e"V /^0 1'^
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND &
RCtTiiANAGEMENT REGARDINGKTHIS MATTER.
57 - f I -
DATESIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER
APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
fim.£c3oo<S"TimeDate Of Hearing JLOw_a.
5
Motion
Bruce Melin and Kathryn M. Kenna - Denied. (7:40 p.m.)
After consideration and discussion, Carl Zick made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the
variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property and/or practical difficulties had been shown that would
allow for the granting of the variance as requested and noting that the applicants can obtain a reasonable use of their property
without the granting of the variance as requested as the applicants have a large lot that would appear to have other suitable
building locations that would meet the required setback from the ordinary high water level.
Cl^rman^tter T^l County B^rd of Adji^ment
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR
bk 0407-001
329.512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota
June §, 2008
Page # 2
Gary Schroeder - Withdrawn
Gary Schroeder, part of Government Lot 1, Section 10 of Elizabeth Township by Long Lake, requested a variance of
20’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for new construction (entry and stairway) 80’ from the
ordinary high water level. A letter from-Shirley and Willis Stelter in support of the variance as requested was noted
for the record. On June 3, 2008 the Secretary of the Board of Adjustment received a phone call from Mr. Gary
Schroeder noting that his plans had changed and that he was withdrawing his variance application.
Scott and LuAnn Vigen - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (7:08 p.m.)
Scott and LuAnn Vigen, Lot 8 Elm\wood Subdivision, Loon Lake in Candor Township, requested a variance of 20’from
the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of an 18’ by 20’ shop 0’ from the road right-of-way (on
the property line). The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After
consideration and discussion, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to
approve a variance of 20’ frofn the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of an 18’ by 20’ shop 0,’
from the road right-of-way as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that
no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It was noted the proposed
development will be improvement over the location of the existing structure which is in the road right-of-way.
Arlin and Bonnie Henkelman - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (7:13 p.m.)
Arlin and Bonnie Henkelman, Lots 7 and 8 Philip Burseth Beach, Wall Lake in Dane Prairie Township, requested the
following: We would like to replace our existing variance for a 16’ by 72’ manufactured home, 5T frorh shoreline to a
28’ by 52’ approximately 47’ from the ordinary high water level as we feel it would be a more positive appearance.
The audience was polled vyith no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Karen Iverson appeared
with the applicants at the public hearing. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second
by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to approve the location and size of the new dwelling as depicted on the .
drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area
can be covered with impervious surfaces and with the condition that the propose garage cannot exceed 780 square
feet.
Darle and Melva Miller - Tabled (7:25 p.m.)
Darle and Melva Miller, Lots 41 and 42 Block 1 Crystal Beach, West McDonald Lake in Dora Township, requested a
variance of 13’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a dwelling 7’ from the road
right-of-way, a variance of 50’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a 36’ by 60’ irregular
shape addition 50’ from the ordinary high water level and variance of 56’ from the required ordinary high water level
setback of 100’ for the placement of a 10’ by 24’ deck 44’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled
with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from the Dora Towns Board of Supervisors in
opposition to the variance as requested was read for the record. At the hearing it was noted that the variance from
the road right-of-way would be 14’ instead of 13’. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion,
second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to table with the verbal permission of the applicant, this variance
application hearing until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicants with an
opportunity to review there proposed development with the Dora Town Board of Supervisors.
Bruce Meiin and Kathryn M. Kenna - Denied. (7:40 p.m.)
Bruce Melin and :Kathryn M. Kenna, part of Government Lot 6, Section 26 of Candor Township by Loon Lake,
requested a variance of 25’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the location of a structure
75’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against-the variance as
requested. A letter from Leslie Sass in support of the development as proposed was read for the record. After'
consideration .and discussion, Carl Zick made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny
the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property and/or practical difficulties had been .
' shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and noting that the applicants can obtain a
reasonable use of their property without the granting of the variance as requested as the applicants have a large lot
that would appear to have other suitable building locations that would meet.the required setback from the ordinary
high water level.
Board of Adjustment
Otter Tail County
Government Services Center
510 Fir Ave W
Fergus Falls, MN 56537
To:May 21, 2008
Leslie Sass
356 Audubon LN
Hudson, WI 54016
From:
I understand that Bruce Melin and Kathyn Kenna, 1218 S 23'^'* St, Grand Forks, ND have
made application to the Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment for a variance of 25 ft.
from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100 ft for the location of a storage
building on their property at 46307 Lands End Road on Loon Lake in Candor Township.
I own the adjacent property at 46289 Lands End Road. I have reviewed the proposed
location for the storage building and have no objection to the granting of this variance.
Although the lot size is not sub-standard, the large peninsula, steep hillside, and existing
road way limit the availability of a building site that would meet the 100 ft. setback
requirement. The site proposed and the variance requested is on a shallow bay that is
away from the main channel of the lake. The owners plan to utilize the existing line of
large pine trees to screen the visibility of the building from the main lake and adjacent
property owners.
Given all of these factors, I feel the proposed site offers the best solution with the lowest
level of impact on the lake and adjacent properties.
Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to be heard on this issue.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
MAY 2 / Z008
Ul ItK IAILCU.AUUIIUK
FERGUS FALLS, MN