The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08000260202900_Variances_08-11-2005982204 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that 982204 this Instrument #------------------------ was filed/recorded irUhis office for record on the—i_L_day of _ ( 2005 ataiZD^m^m recording f^ well certificate rder THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee Receipt Number I 3^34"7COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Accepted By / Date^^"^A4^r^. *1-ketv Sk^jhj J} i'cJ ^ DAYTIME PHONE (/X-jPROPERTY OWNER 'hi'/k loo51 5'^ 5 MAILING ADDRESS I 7 LAKE CLASS OavvA o n_______ LAKE NAMELAKE NUMBER mSECTION Jlla TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP NAMERANGE E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL ^ _NUMBER 0 3.00^3 a LEGAL DESCRIPTION AJ tv (^ooJiS.E. Cpr, Lot Id + l>" "io'//3t Acres i TYPE OF VARIANPE REQUESTED (Please Che<^ V structure Size ___Sewage System v Subdivision Ciuster Misc.Structure Setback la*V 14* e)C/ST/V<^'^ but 1<^“, rvj ^ , oA sT) UI B ) SPECIFY VARIANCE RFOl ip^TED^^^^l 73* settxw-K Uanan.c-i.'^^^’cjrS'.^ S^Tba<L|< Is AOD i'C) S ' Ov^tOL- ft ." A S jfiTDpdS,^7 id Ouvo /^JUfjuUt. I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO/GklDERSTAND ThA OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURQS MANAGEMEr T REGARDING THIS MATTER. T-lii 1 x( d-rm \NT SIGNATURE OF PR ERTY OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 4-Time//Date Of Hearing Motion Patrick and Kathleen Skelly - Approved the variance as requested. (7:50 p.m.) After discussion and consideration, Cecil Femling made a motion, second by Rod Boyer and carried with Steve Schierer voting no, to approve the variance as requested and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. Hardship is the terrain and topography of the applicants’ property. Chairman/OtterTail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management y Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR L R Official/Date bk 0903-001 315.694 • Vidor Lundeen Co., Printers • Fergus Falls, Minnesota JgUSt 11, ZUU5 Page # 3 John A and Joanne A Molstre - Denied. (7:40 p.m.) John A and Joanne A Molstre, Lot 11 Olson's North Shore and part of Government Lot 5, Section 2 of Eagle Lake Township by Eagle Lake, requested a variance of 45' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' and a variance of 8.5' from the required shore impact zone setback of 37.5' for the enclosure of two existing porch areas and a variance of 3' from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for an addition to the north side of the existing structure 7' from the lot line. The applicants noted that they are no longer requesting the side lot line variance of 3', The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Rod Boyer made a motion, second by Cecil Femling and carried with Paul Larson and Michael Conlon voting no, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and the proposed development on the lakeside of the cabin is within the shore impact zone. ^^,^/^trick and Kathleen Skelly - Approved the variance as requested. (7:50 p.m.) Patrick and Kathleen Skelly, part of Government Lot 10, Section 26 of Candor Township by Loon Lake, requested a variance of 73' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' and a variance of 23' from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for the repair of an existing building located 27' from the ordinary high water level, a variance of 59' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 9’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for an addition to an existing structure 4T from the ordinary high water level and a variance of 25’ from the required setback of 75’ for the placement of a septic holding tank 50' from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from Mary and Tim Wieben in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Cecil Femling made a motion, second by Rod Boyer and carried with Steve Schierer voting no, to approve the variance as requested and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. Hardship is the terrain and topography of the applicants’ property. Mark H and Kathryn R Biederman - Approved the variance as modified with a condition. (8:12 p.m.) Mark H and Kathryn R Biederman, part of Lot 14 and all of Lot 15 Camp Tynset, South Ten Mile Lake in Tumuli Township, requested a variance of 15’ and a variance of 12’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20' for the placement of one corner of the proposed 24’ by 32’ garage/dwelling 8' from the road right-of-way and for the placement of the other corner of the proposed 24' by 32’ garage/dwelling 5’ from the road right-of-way. A letter from Tumuli Township requesting a setback of 22’ from the edge of the existing blacktop was read for the record. A letter from Tony and Judith Rivera in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Cecil Femling made a motion, second by Rod Boyer and unanimously carried, to approve the placement of the proposed 24' by 32’ garage/dwelling 22’ from the existing blacktop with the condition that access to the garage must be from the lot and not directly from the road. Hardship is the terrain of the applicants’ property. Eugene and Karen Prim - Approved the variance as modified with a condition. (8:26 p.m.) Eugene and Karen Prim, part of Government Lot 3, Section 20 of Dunn Township by Lake Lizzie, requested a variance of 76' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 27’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for the replacement of an existing dwelling with a new structure 24’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. An email from James Bruggeman and from John and Judy Gunkelman in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Cecil Femling to approve the variance as requested with the following conditions: 1.) no more than 25% of the total lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces as determined by the Land and Resource Department, 2.) no other variance can be granted for the proposed development, and 3.) the proposed development can be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure. The motion failed with Rod Boyer, Randall Mann and Steve Schierer voting no. This is a letter of explanation to assist in the identification of variances requested. This variance is an “after the fact” request. Variance #1: Request a 73’ setback variance fi'om Loon Lake. This is an existing building in which we are repairing the crumbling foundation and bottom 1 ’ of the wood structure which is rotting. Building is remaining the same size, just upgrading for durability and giving it new siding for a “facelift”. Variance #2: Request of a 59’ setback variance from Loon Lake. This is an existing building to which we added a 6’ addition extending no closer to the lake from the already existing building, and remaining well under the 100’ required setback towards which the addition was extended. Variance #3: Request of a 25’ setback variance from Loon Lake for a 1000 gallon septic holding tank. The building currently has a composting toilet; and gray water from a kitchen sink which drains into a hole in the ground which has been in existence since the family acquired the property in the 1930s. They have been in the process of upgrading said property during the past years to comply with county regulations. The proposed site for the holding tank meets the county’s requirements for a “developmental property”; however, this property is listed as “recreational” which requires an additional 25’ setback from a lake. It is this additional 25’ setback which a variance is being requested. The pictures have been provided to aid the drawing to see the limited alternate sources for a holding tank in other locations.