HomeMy WebLinkAbout36000170119005_Variances_12-02-2009Variances
Barcode 128
WVIO^
OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA
was filed/recorded jn this office
for re
1073041
3cord on.^e_J::3flay
(atwaJ/ 2010 at //.3Q (^bm
Wendy L.' M^calt Courity Recorder
hyU I
U U> - COcj^ riecordina'fee//
well certifies^
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER
540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 998-8095
Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us
370°-Application Fee
Receipt Number \ 4 'O
Accepted By / Date ^ U ~\~L-C>‘\
DAYTIME PHONE ~7^3 l~7 J
COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK
PROPERTY OWNER 0006? -F KKTHlY '\g»UR>Cv=-rT
MAILING ADDRESS /V-SZO /S A^O]2TH .pE-YMOC/TH ,M>0'
LAKE CLASS M ET
) ^ I RANGE 3*? TOWNSHIP NAME Z-g7xP~ MOL>?OTlNlK]
E-911ADDRESS )3GS>3> Z>AM&
LAKE NUMBER SC=>-J^C> LAKE NAME SP^T^-ET^
nSECTION TOWNSHIP
PARCELNUMBER 3 Q=,000 \10 1)^00 S.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Sens a-ttaougi^
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
structure Setback .X. Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc.
SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS
THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION.
Woul-d Pet3u»T2vs A -2:s’ var.;amce ti^ hb
‘SHO'RcE'I-I/\) \£- 'PAOi* VAdAfv^G W<Dol-C> CM STAK)PPvv2.’D
'Z-Oo' S(HT"BA0)C -to /7S ' .
Sw SMoRG'^;a7G.
WO VA-R^ANJCG
SCE13 ATTACHiETi ' A'OTT) moW/IVil- /Mfo”S-H EETL
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND &
^^R^^RCE MAI lGement regarding this matter.
d I) /jojo^
fiGNA /AGENT FOR OWNER DATE
□CANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
SCANNED
Date Of Hearing Time
1: /(f F-irKc/ofa-
Motion
Doug and Kathy Burkett - Denied. (7:18 p.m.)
April 8, 2010 Meeting - The applicants were not in attendance at the April 8, 2010 meeting nor had the office received any
communication requesting the tabling of the application until a future meeting; therefore, after consideration and discussion,
Randall Mann made a motion second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance application as requested
due to the failure of the applicants to attend the scheduled meeting, to request the continuance of the hearing until a later date and
noting that no adequate hardship/practical difficulty had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested
as the applicants have adequate room for the placement of the proposed development in a location which would not require a
variance from the required ordinary high water level setback, and which will provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their
property.
iairmar^tter Tail County Board of Ad]>jitment
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR
L R Official/Date
bk 0407-001
329.512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota
PPOPOOED USSAL DESCRIPTION
All that part of Covemmeryt Lot Section 17, Townthip 131, Range 3^,
Otter Tail County, Minne^otp, described as foltou/S:
Commencing at the southeemt comer of said Section 17; thence North 47
degrees 36 minutes 04 seconds Nest (tor descriptive purposes only the
east line of said Section 17 has an assumed bearing of North) a distance
of 4PS4.76 feet to an iron monument marked RLS 13620; thence North 21
degrees 31 minutes 50 seconds Cast a distcnce of 200 OO feet, thence
South 73 degrees 20 miriftes 27 seconds East a distance of 360.15 feet to
the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point to be
hereinafter referred to as Point *A’; thence South 36 degrees 16 minutes 33 seconds Nest a distance of 263.^ feet; thence South 2S degrees OC
minutes 17 seconds Nest a distance of 333. “^7 Feet: thence South 36
degrees 22 minutes 43 seconds Nest a distcnce of 214 feet more or less to
the shoreline of Spitzer Lake; thence southeasterly, northeasterly end
northwesterly along said shoreline to the intersection with o line which
bears South 27 degrees 06 minutes 47 seconds East from the point of
beginning; thence North 27 degrees 06 minutes 47 seconds Nest a distance
of 126 feet more or less to the point of beginning.
Containing 5.00 acres mare or less. Subject to easements and reservations
of public record. Together with and subject to a 33 foot road easement over
and across Government Lots 6, 9 end 10, Section !7, Township 131, Range
Otter Tail County, Minnesota, being a strip of lend 33.00 Feet to the left
of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast comer of said Section I7; thence North 47
degrees 36 minutes 04 seconds Nest {for descriptive purposes only the
east linm of said Section !7 has an assumed bearing of North) a distance
of 4RS4.76 feet to en iron monument marked RLS 13620, the point of
beginning of the line to be described; thence North 56 degrees Oi minutes
41 seconds East a distance of 236.47 feet; thence South 6T degrees 42
minutes !6 seconds Cost a distance of 145.46 feet; thence North
degrees 16 minutes 4! seconds East a distance of 36.66 feet to said Point
"A'; thence North 55 degrees SO minutes lO seconds East a distance of
156.31 feet; thence North 67 degrees 42 minutes 25 seconds East a
distance of 233.62 Feet; thence South 43 degrees 46 minutes 44 seconds
East a stance of 530.36 feet; thence South 37 degrees 06 minutes 27
seconds East a distance of 526.30 feet; thence South 14 degrees 37
minutes 13 seconds East a distance of 123.67 feet; thence South 47
degrees Oi mknutes 03 seconds East a distance of 36.10 feet, thence South
22 degrees 13 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 64 52 feet; thence
South 02 degrees l2 minutes 26 seconds Nest a distance of 31.26 feet,
thence South 2! degrees 03 minutes 54 seconds Nest a distance of 62 31
feet; thence South 02 degrees 33 minutes 06 seconds Nest a distance of
62.6! feet, thence South 13 degrees !6 minutes 47 seconds East a distance
of 165.62 feet; thence South 07 degrees 26 minutes 27 seconds East p
distance of 177.61 feet; thence South 31 degrees !2 minutes 22 seconds
Nest a distance of 66 65 feet to the centerline of SpHier Lake Rood and
there terminatinp
The sideline of said easement are to terminate an a line which bears North
66 degrees 26 minutes iO seconds Nest from the point Of beginning of the
above described line. Together with an ingress end egress easement over and
across Government Lot 3, Section 17, Township 131, Range 33, Otter Tail
County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast comer of said Section 17; thence North 47
degrees 36 minutes 04 seconds Nest {For descriptive purposes only the
east line of said Section 17 has an assumed bearing of North) a distance
of 4354 76 feet to an iron monument marked RLS 13620; thence North 56
degrees 01 minutes 4! seconds East a distance of 236.47 feet; thence
South 63 degrees 42 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 145 46 feet;
thence North 63 degrees !6 minutes 4! seconds East a distance of 36.33
feet to said Point ’A’, the point of beginning of the land to be
described; thence North 55 degrees 50 minutes 10 seconds East a distance
of 156.31 feet; thence South 42 degrees 03 minutes 14 seconds Nest a
distance of 166.62 feet to the intersection with a line which bears South
27 degrees 06 minutes 47 seconds East from the point of beginninq; thence
North 27 degrees 06 minutes 47 seconds Nest a distance of 40.00 fee! to
the point of heginninp
w- —-V
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that this is a true end correct representation of a survey
of the boundaries of the ct>ove described tend, and that this survey was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that / cm a Professionpi
Laid Surveyor licensed under the laws of the State of Minnesota Dated this
23th day of June, 2005.
/
seWDavid A. Anderson
Professionat Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 13620
April 8, 2010
Page # 3
Doug and Kathy Burkett - Denied. (7:18 p.m.)
Doug and Kathy Burkett, part of Government Lot 9, Section 17 of Leaf Mountain Township by Spitzer Lake, requested
the following: This project would require a 25' variance on the Northeast and Southeast shoreline setback. The
variance wouid change standard 200' setback to 175' setback. No variance required on Southwest shoreline.
December 2, 2009 meeting - The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as
requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and
unanimously carried, to table, with the applicants’ verbal permission, this hearing until the next scheduled meeting of
the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicants with an opportunity to consider another location which would not
require a variance for the development as proposed. It was noted that the applicants have a very large parcel which
should provide adequate room for the placement of the proposed development in a location which would not require a
variance from the required ordinary high water level setback and which will provide the applicants with a reasonable
use of their property. January 7, 2010 meeting -The applicant’s were not present at the January 7, 2010 meeting;
therefore, no action was taken by the Board of Adjustment at the January 7, 2010 meeting. April 8, 2010 Meeting -
The applicants were not in attendance at the April 8, 2010 meeting nor had the office received any communication
requesting the tabling of the application until a future meeting; therefore, after consideration and discussion, Randall
Mann made a motion second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance application as
requested due to the failure of the applicants to attend the scheduled meeting, to request the continuance of the
hearing until a later date and noting that no adequate hardship/practical difficulty had been shown that would allow for
the granting of the variance as requested as the applicants have adequate room for the placement of the proposed
development In a location which would not require a variance from the required ordinary high water level setback, and
which will provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their property.
With no further business, Randall Mann, Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
Prepared by: ^
Wayna;^tein, Secretary
The minutes were mailed on Friday, April 9, 2010 to the Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment. Official action
regarding these minutes will be taken by the Board of Adjustment at their next regularly schedule meeting.
SCANNED
January 7,2010
Page # 4
Laurie Mullen - Denied. (8:05 p.m.)
Laurie Mullen, Lot 8 of Shady Nook Beach Addition, Pickerel Lake in Maine Township, requested the following: 1.) a
variance of 5’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the extension of the existing breezeway 14' toward the
lake, and 2.) a variance of4T from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for the placement of an 8' by
6’ pergola 59' from the ordinary high water level. June 4, 2009 Meeting - Miles Anderson appeared with the applicant
at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Lorena Kezar and William Karp expressing concerns with the
variance as requested. A letter from Lorena M. Kezar in opposition to the variance as requested was not read at the
public hearing as Ms. Kezar was in attendance and spoke on her on behalf. After consideration and discussion,
Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to table, with the applicant’s verbal
permission, this hearing until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicant and the
Land and Resource Department the opportunity to determine if the proposed development is behind the string line. It
was noted that there is no adequate hardship/practical difficulty that would allow for the granting of the side lot line
variance as requested as the applicant has adequate room to place the structure 10' from the side lot line. July 2,
2009 Meeting - Prior to the July 2, 2009 meeting the applicant submitted a letter requesting that her application be
tabled until the August 6, 2009 meeting of the Board of Adjustment. August 6, 2009 Meeting - Prior to the August 6,
2009 meeting the applicant submitted a letter requesting that her application be tabled until the October 1, 2009
meeting of the Board of Adjustment. September 3, 2009 Meeting - no action taken. October 1, 2009 Meeting -
Prior to the October 1,2009 meeting the applicant submitted a letter requesting that her application be tabled until the
November 5, 2009 meeting. No action was taken by the Board. November 5, 2009 Meeting and December 2, 2009
Meeting - Prior to the November 5, 2009 meeting and the December 2, 2009 meeting the applicant submitted a letter
requesting that her application be tabled until the January 7, 2009 meeting. No action was taken by the Board.
January 7, 2010 meeting - It was noted that the requested variance from ordinary high water level setback is not
required as the applicant’s proposed development is behind the string line. After discussion and consideration,
Michael Harris made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as
no adequate hardship/practical difficulty unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of
the variance as requested. It was noted that the applicant can obtain a reasonable use of her property without the
granting of the variance as requested.
Thomas A and Renee L Worum - Tabled
Thomas A and Renee L Worum, Lot 6 Block 1 Oakdale Second Addition, South Turtle Lake in Tordenskjold
Township, requested the following: Building an access road to our lake front via our own property. Is needed due to
previous road, which was lost due to the home constructed on Lot 7. (1) We are requesting a 9’ variance on the south
lot line so road can come within 1 ’ of the line (9’ variance). (2) Requesting a variance to be in the bluff impact zone
totally where the 12' road will be put in. Note: 120-150 cubic yards of earth are estimated to be moved. December
2, 2009 meeting - The audience was polled with Kim Johansen speaking for the variance as requested. After
consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to
table, with the applicants’ verbal permission, this hearing until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment
to provide the applicants with an opportunity to prepare a formal excavation and stabilization plan for the proposed
project and to consider other possible alternatives. The application was tabled because of concerns regarding how
the proposed project would impact the bluff area and the structure on the adjacent property. January 7, 2010
meeting - Tom Worum submitted an email on December 22, 2009 requesting that his hearing be tabled until the next
regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment. The Board of Adjustment took no action at the January 7,
2010 meeting.
Doug and Kathy Burkett-Tabled.
Doug and Kathy Burkett, part of Government Lot 9, Section 17 of Leaf Mountain Township by Spitzer Lake, requested
the following: This project would require a 25’ variance on the Northeast and Southeast shoreline setback. The
variance would change standard 200’ setback to 175' setback. No variance required on Southwest shoreline.
December 2, 2009 meeting - The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as
requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and
unanimously carried, to table, with the applicants’ verbal permission, this hearing until the next scheduled meeting of
the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicants with an opportunity to consider another location which would not
require a variance for the development as proposed. It was noted that the applicants have a very large parcel which
should provide adequate room for the placement of the proposed development in a location whi« variance from the required ordinary high water level setback and which will provide the applic^
use of their property. January 7, 2010 meeting -The applicant’s were not present at the Janu^
therefore, no action was taken by the Board of Adjustment at the January 7, 2010 meeting.
December 2, 2009
Page # 2
Joyce Esser-Approved as modified with a condition. (7:05 p.m.)
Joyce Esser, Lot 15 Blocki, Woodland Acres, Loon Lake in Candor Township, requested the following: Request a
variance to position the house in line with the sight line between houses on Lot 14 and Lot 16. Reasons for the
variance (1) the house on Lot 16 was granted a variance to move closer than 100’ setback, (2) lot size is less than
40,000 square feet, (3) more than 50% of the lot is within the 100’ setback and (4) the shape of the lot and the
topography limits the position of the house, garage, well and sewage system. At closest point dwelling will be 66'
from ordinary high water level. Request a 34’ variance. I am also requesting a variance to have this lot declared
buildable for single family residential use. This was a lot of record September 23, 1980. Joe Esser represented the
applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Sandy Gronhovd, Loon Lake Association President,
presenting the board with a number of pictures of the immediate area and expressing concerns with the proposed
ordinary high water level setback. A letter from Neil Strawhorn, Sustainability Committee, supporting declaring the lot
a buildable lot and opposing the proposed setback from the ordinary high water level was read for the record. After
consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to
declare Lot 15 Block 1, Woodland Acres a buildable lot for single family residential use. After additional consideration
and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a
variance of 20’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a dwelling 80’ from the
ordinary high water level with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with
impervious surfaces.
Doug and Kathy Burkett - Tabled. (7:25 p.m.)
Doug and Kathy Burkett, part of Government Lot 9, Section 17 of Leaf Mountain Township by Spitzer Lake, requested
the following: This project would require a 25’ variance on the Northeast and Southeast shoreline setback. The
variance would change standard 200’ setback to 175’ setback. No variance required on Southwest shoreline. The
audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and
discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to table, with the
applicants’ verbal permission, this hearing until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the
applicants with an opportunity to consider another location which would not require a variance for the development as
proposed. It was noted that the applicants have a very large parcel which should provide adequate room for the
placement of the proposed development in a location which would not require a variance from the required ordinary
high water level setback and which will provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their property.
Laurie Mullen - Tabled.
Laurie Mullen, Lot 8 of Shady Nook Beach Addition, Pickerel Lake in Maine Township, requested the following: 1.) a
variance of 5’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the extension of the existing breezeway 14’ toward the
lake, and 2.) a variance of 4T from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of an 8’ by
6’ pergola 59' from the ordinary high water level. June 4, 2009 Meeting - Miles Anderson appeared with the applicant
at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Lorena Kezar and William Karp expressing concerns with the
variance as requested. A letter from Lorena M. Kezar in opposition to the variance as requested was not read at the
public hearing as Ms. Kezar was in attendance and spoke on her on behalf. After consideration and discussion,
Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to table, with the applicant’s verbal
permission, this hearing until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicant and the
Land and Resource Department the opportunity to determine if the proposed development is behind the string line. It
was noted that there is no adequate hardship/practical difficulty that would allow for the granting of the side lot line
variance as requested as the applicant has adequate room to place the structure 10’ from the side lot line. July 2,
2009 Meeting - Prior to the July 2, 2009 meeting the applicant submitted a letter requesting that her application be
tabled until the August 6, 2009 meeting of the Board of Adjustment. August 6, 2009 Meeting - Prior to the August 6,
2009 meeting the applicant submitted a letter requesting that her application be tabled until the October 1, 2009
meeting of the Board of Adjustment. September 3, 2009 Meeting - no action taken. October 1, 2009 Meeting -
Prior to the October 1, 2009 meeting the applicant submitted a letter requesting that her application be tabled until the
November 5, 2009 meeting. No action was taken by the Board. November 5, 2009 Meeting and December 2, 2009
Meeting - Prior to the November 5, 2009 meeting and the December 2, 2009 meeting the applicant submitted a letter
requesting that her application be tabled until the January 7, 2009 meeting. No action was taken by the Board.
SCANNED
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHEET
November 10, 2009
Variance Applicant: Doug & Kathy Burkett
E-911 Address: 13653 Spitzer Lake Lane
Parcel Numben 36000170119005
Lake Number:
Lake Name:
Lake Classification: Natural Environment
56-160
Spitzer
"Specify how your project varies from ordinance requirements. Please be brief as this
will be used for public notification".
This project would require a 25' variance on the NE & SE shoreline set back. The variance would change
the standard 200' set back to 175' set back. No variance would be required on the SW shoreline.
The project consists of a new year round home. This will be our retirement home. There is a hardship we
are dealing with in this process. There is a large depression in the center of the property as you can see on
the topo provided by Anderson Land Surveying. This is a 5 acre parcel of land. Amazingly, the "buildable"
area is hindered by the combination of the 200' set back, and the depression. The garage falls within the
standard 200' set back area, as shown, with a view of the pit which is irrelevant for a garage. The house,
however, should not be built in the pit due to drainage. If we could obtain permission to change the set
back by 25' on two sides of this property, the home would sit ahead of this pit as shown on the topo. No
variance would be required on the SW shoreline.
The property is very heavily wooded, but there is a rood to the existing trailer. The trailer would be
removed. The existing road would be utilized. The architects rendering of the proposed home is attached
for your use. We are striving to have this proposed home be a Minnesota Green Star residence as directed
by Sala Architects of Minneapolis. They have experience in assisting home owners in achieving Minnesota
Green Star and Energy Star projects, it is also our intention to utilize a contractor that is experienced in
LEED (Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design).
ince for your consideration.
In answer to:
Thank you in a/
Kathy Burkel
SCANNED
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET:
List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing):
/S3&FfiStructure(s):
Ft2Deck(s):
3000 Ft2Driveway(s):
50 Ft2Patio(s):
200 Ft2Sidewalk(s):
a Ft2Stairway(s):
O Ft2Retaining Wall(s):
O Ft2Landscaping:
(Plastic Barrier)
Other:O Ft2
Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:
'2.)y, QOO R2LOT AREA:
4. 'Zjy. 000 %X100 =
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREATOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
SCANNED
SCALE DRAWING FORM
SGooaiyoii^ oas
Tax Parcel Number(s)
The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), ail existing and/or proposed structures, septic
tanks, drainfields, lotiines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. bluffs), and onsite impervious surface
calculations.
NoTEV> OKI C'j %Scale Impervious Surface Ratio
(Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side)
Sighature of Property Owner Date
BK —0909 338.596 ♦ Viciof Lund®^ Co, Printers • Fergus Falls, MN • 1-800-346-4870
(...3
Notice of Hearing for Variance
Otter Taii County
Government Services Center
510 Fir AveW
Fergus Faiis, MN 56537
(218) 998-8030/998-8041
Emaii - wstein@co.ottertaii.mn.us
www.co.otter-taii.mn.us
Applicant and/or appiicant’s representative must be present at the scheduied hearing.
To Whom It May Concern:
Doug and Kathy Burkett
14820 13'^ Place North
Plymouth, MN 55447
has made application to the Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment for a variance as per requirements of the Otter Tail
County Shoreland Management Ordinance, the Otter Tail County Set Back Ordinance and/or the Subdivision Controls
Ordinance. The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment will assemble for this hearing on
Wednesday, December 2, 2009 at 6:30 p.m.9
in the Commissioners’ Room of the Otter Tail County Government Services Center, Fergus Falls, MN. (Please use the public
entrance located on the northeasterly side of the Government Services Center. The second left off Fir Ave.) Individuals
requiring special accommodations should contact the County Auditor’s office prior to the date of the public hearing.
The property concerned in the application is legally described as
part of Government Lot 9,
Property Address - 13653 Spitzer Lake Lane
Section 17, Township 131, Range 39 - Township Name - Leaf Mountain
Lake No. 56-160, Lake Name - Spitzer, Class - NE
The variance requested is -
the following: This project would require a 25’ variance on the Northeast and Southeast shoreline setback. The variance
would change standard 200’ setback to 175’ setback. No variance required on Southwest shoreline.
'Wayne Stein
Board of Adjustment Secretary
Date: November 12, 2009
3
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
Fergus Falls, Minnesota
State of Minnesota )
)SS
County of Otter Tail)
I, Wayne Stein, Secretary for the Board of Adjustment for Otter Tail County, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that on the 16th, day of November, 2009 the attached Notice of Hearing for Variance was duly
served upon the individuals listed below and/or included in the attachment:
Douglas & Kathryn Burkett, 14820 13*^ PL N, Plymouth, MN 55447-4529
Charles Klimek, Twp clerk of Leaf ML, 13420 455**' Ave, Vining, MN 56588
Otter Tail County Cola, % John Matteson, 23674 W Silver Lake Rd, Battle Lake,MN 56515
Richard West, OTC HWY Engineer, 505 S. Court St. Suite #1 Fergus Falls, MN 56537
Terry Lejcher, DNR 1509 1®‘Ave N., Fergus Falls, MN 56537
DNR Regional Administrator, 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE, Bemidji, MN 56601
Town Clerk
Board of Adjustment:
Paul R. Larson, 21283 County Highway 65, Henning, MN 56551-9573
Richard S. Schierer, 32117 260th Ave, Erhard,MN 56534
Thomas (Tom) Lee, 15600 Cty Hwy 118, Elizabeth, MN 56533-9559
Randall Mann, 532 N. Ann St., Fergus Falls, MN 56537
Michael Harris, 35387 Northern Lights TrI, Richville, MN 56576-9672
Rick Wilson, 609 Wl Lakeside Dr, Fergus Falls, MN 56537
by placing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the
same in the United States Mail at Fergus Falls, MN, property addressed to each of the individuals
listed above and/or listed in the attachment.
Dated: November 16th, 2009
Wayne Stein, Secretary
Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment
CL^By:X
Vi Manderud
SCANNED
BURK'S BAY PARTNERS
15069 SCENIC DR
DAYTON MN 55327 9791
JAMES & JOAN BURKETT
15069 SCENIC DR
DAYTON MN 55327 9791
DOUGLAS & KATHRYN BURKETT
14820 13TH PLN
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 4529
LUTH BRETHREN BIBLE CAMP INC
13207 INSPIRATION TRL
CLITHERALLMN 56524 9556
GREGORY & KATHRYN RAETHER
8265 PEONY LN N
MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 1713
JOSEPH A & EILEEN KOEP
41581 SPITZER LAKE RD
CLITHERALLMN 56524 9555
ERIKATHORBERG
42037 SPITZER LAKE RD
CLITHERALLMN 56524 9555
GENE E STEPHENS
5748 BIRCHWOOD AVE NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 1313
SCANNED
WAIVER OF 60-DAY RULE
THIS WAIVER MUST BE FILED AND SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE OF LAND &
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT BETWEEN OCTOBER & MARCH
I understand that, due to snow cover, the Planning Commission Members
and/or the Board of Adjustment Members may not be able to view my
property/project (Tax Parcel # 3Coooi7om^oqS
described in my VAi^ifr>NCt=
dated 11 j\c>)o<R
Otter Tail County to meet the legal requirement to take action within 60
days of the receipt of the completed Application(s). I understand that in the
absence of a waiver of the 60-Day Requirement, the County may have no
alternative but to deny my Application(s). Therefore, I hereby agree to
waive the 60-day time limit in order to allow time for the Planning
Commission Members and/or Board of Adjustment Members to view the
property before taldOP action on rnv,Application(s).
Application
As a result, it may not be possible for
DATED
SSCANNED11-02-04
Mbowman forms-apps waiver 60 day rule
%
%
t /V/ /// /7/" / / /
t f
/ ‘ f
i * •
t ! !
/77//7✓//
7
/
■?
!
/
/•
^ IIMliWAfti fj fMWiAStoMstSi>»aF
■WWW. SAiAwt <•!»
lU'^D4s'-o'’y'-
^ p
pn_=j=c|-
t 7<3
1j=iiroi4E.4-•0|i
”1i! I 4c £t 5r4-fo tiI'tWHY
I-i-fn—I
4^V 3 ^I !
,—I 1I oi A V-ro^oH--i!"iOn-Jiw^ \.«• o;Livi MI i !
i%3i■ H 4I•:uI.}
z!i !•1 !i ^f|===F ■1i[o
1tr-~
A
10.04 ■f
t
PWKi Number:
#^71oi
AfchMect;P>A>4R>t^*a
Drawn 9y:
H'^i4 lpv(7.L pL^i4-/5?(i S.Fi
Date of lt»«:
j
ShaeiNo.
sill
IA«
_ MtNtHAMMIf ■ iMlmmarnum. mm
nnwHIiSN »ii4SrStolmw wK-lMa will
r
IRCHtMM
□
^ tlKlWAtM ri W*l*«*ittnrti|MH< Ml ifclMWjBMETHnmSBT
WK IMf) m-mr
wntJMA«f<c.eMi
4b'o’'
t^ —-7---------
I1
oif <5
. 4
00 ■
"d-----3^
£(UM.
3•■n
V Sif:
J/o-Cil4.e-.X6AA/.aI V-4idE/cT i ii a
-Xi i»4
Ii
nT
II!JCL-TAiaiiq^1
+
hw^ect NiMbar:
4-7 lot
Pn»(cci AitMtect;
Drawn By;
odx^ Litv-t^u ■;z/^ sp t
T'o"
k
OMof Hsue:
A.cH6-rV«rfUiy
rn I
A# « k ) l»( >».
_ MtNMfAKKM ■ «moKNwiCwiNK mTifefliiwr nwtlH jf| m—>i
ISCKMCM
4* !•••■< Hgw
iTMlWAtfR
4&''o"
!
>,C)!.■'"k(
Jm.
"~V
f?A'n4*V*
i-^fU^oY
:^ -i.rt:
Lir £' itu>.I ^ I 3Ilo4\\i
_i ^
^ •i i^J I I . i\V-f
:^u>rr \
j2^nbils=^-------
; _^oof^ OLO-
P-oof- ? . I
V-
i:iiI/■ ii •/I ! 1!It
/•1/\
E
:l!II :j ;!5 }
:t
iiii +
I !44-U-U i—P-i!;I—>—t ■j—V TT1---------1
Number:
<L5li5l____
Project AfcWtect;
clret^f^ uo^t.U' i^ua.4 Dr»%vnWSz- Sf
DateofHsue:
fH
O
STtUWMtB
□
mmMUt£«L£Oni
■
u
/V
_______I
i:
4--i ....
21rCxjdfUt''^
^-uoH £O
V* tjc-no'-b ~ ■ j
Uop-f'V. WA*UU? '\
f^.,
5;>“
ij
Si
s </~1l1 V-■1
il Vr!III II pi* 4^4
•:• ■ i
iJl iiIUfviMMroi tUih-Ui I •i,1 '• ft •I -aa Ii 1I!i !V^^i1 iIf
‘»•' •' ••'z-V~trrITT^I «•
^ ■
t
oJk.
i
a
Pn^ict Arct>K^:
Drown By;
i.
Date of tsssue:'bCCTlCiP.
J
ShaftNo.
□ ■
„ suumria
m wom.iMAtfc.am
1(•rt:'!r.f|/N!l'i !i;s i:I:iii;ii.1ii
ft)151
5 ti^}
V~5#Vr4 </s"'" T'-'o'*riite
rYf. hExr#*^u I
-r®
1
i
i
1drflje- utv LU
L^f bp_
'-jlOlH4.il
t»<ndaaienwatt»B^tafe?a» rn*mirtii;uat.
Pro^ecrhiumbar;
^e>l\<>\
Projea iA«rWtect:
Drawn 8y;ST^M£^ ci|2-
poUKO^ri isM-Oate of Issue:o
^oaT^\ bLfc3yiATio4
i-
«wetHto.