The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02000990699000_Variances_09-16-1999Variances 2 Barcode 128 ' - V ■" *'r*X)jiM (j!-0 t^l<. ^/w^p-64_UM;^/OCL C^O J-O'Vo-^-C- C^y - ^\ THE ABOVE SPACE <S RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739-2271 COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK *** Application Fee Receipt Number XCHARb CuFfgy^I'Sfoo' 3"7(oi v^'oakPROPERTY OWNER ___________DAYTIME PHONE OmAH/i, G8/SO-oooi?Q ^QxADDRESS RO5(e' "iilOlake number LAKE NAME LAKE CLASS A\M.ofis/5Y RANGE ^0SECTION_ TOWNSHIP Qjt- OOP 0(q°i^-Q0Q TOWNSHIP NAME PARCEL NUMBER FIRE; LAKE I.D. NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION Aot 6 '^u LfoRtiS AoOa3 TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED {Please Check) •X.■ structure Setback Structure Size____Sewage System____ Subdivision____ Cluster Misc SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED \ A'Jp Ip 7 O i.n r- (^5/2£. I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOUfiU^E MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. I / 'SlGN^ ^61^ OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE PPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The DateFTime Of Hearing) fflOTBiDPLOTPUm ifeet -SKETCHING FORM- ~Js r~i~t f66t:+IIScale:rid(s)-equals inch(es)or equals •A,..L ■‘■iJ s<r zMW ••i-[-<1 iH------!,.-------f^l~|i -i—I-j-"-—I—:____________~|~ ^ . - Pleake:sketch-}j!0,arlotirid^^^^ - \2.D ;. - I ’ .; :, -i-|..J-T^j- M %!I rseptic-jan^aMacsM:::~am JJ-I I: :i I-: .•i'. 9 StlfrfZSS;: ■i <f-H rSj. := h V J*'th:i::if« ±ii-J..I !-:j I .■.i--i'Tf—I— I.. j_..j_i. i-j.■ -JC' '-isn;t.l!t:;tiid+:t k;'i“i“T 1%O'Oo / .A Xi':d I-k5rl-I J •*.-V■! ?/£/ V. ........-_J±i_L_zLi:© -di-i'SM ■_-i ;■fcUa •-5h----- ----r l!:":i d:J.;l ':V -i-t■■■!i i/. - I I.>•i:ITId-i-i-ldd™ .ddlTThrth: ... :ii_!:df. ai'.TLrx^ F?sGiV/p<rI f ss\£n \. t { i jliSi '.t _L 1. ■ -r!’■i; -St J- I'J.■.jT!:jj:!:d • i- j-Hf- -!-..jdllddd ■ ^ -r'-i-:-li; ri - -hi:f- 13 1. •3r r ATP'BjC St !wS?fc'Tcra r:-.I '.':l+<• jj*:+m I -:v i ■i r«!Cp^r*k J.it4-” ; .-m .».Ml±r4 ♦a:?idd i aifk.!iJ.:ndr 1:"ItrR-i-nl1IJO -Ik r-*. • it :vx[Ii-r >-,!,• • ■i:H: Md :.ji. TO•.r'/Wloor* *-i'-r VK I .r - 11 ±dSiviHi$=z tiaZ OA_CH- L !'■ P Hki,A /.IC i£Jl0*^i \ MKL — ObVi.XwX III r? .* .SS9™*m ti±iidi dRNv s ijiiiirhJ.- new LundMn Ce. frinwi * f iRS^fTjr jni£J;J. 'Hrd . :I t ‘ v.dd--dd3^«V^ J V'■'d‘ '< ■ , -.dk -.:.'d...;^*v». :•fr tfk.v- FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT• i Nature of Violation: A. Grade/Fill Project Photoqraohs: #Taken ^ ;g-:> /tTHE VIOLATION IS:B. Building Project T C. Sewage Disposal ___ D. Other (Describe) ^t__> E. None Sketch: /-y<2AAiU'-,~^ -7- '/ // Observation/Recommendation: 1/^/■f?u r-/ - /■-/f- /)jd"jdy Investigated By P ate Time> 1/97 853938 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA SlmS?!853938 was filed/recorded in this office for record on the Wendy L.^Metcaif, 9punty peco^er^^QcL 2by: I A ^cording fee well certificate THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739-2271 •“COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK *** Application Fee /ioAOlReceipt Number tCHfiKb Quffei hSfOO' WoAK.PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE ?o &OX 3as8 OMAH/i. (s>^l80~ OOC\ADDRESS RD56,' 'lilOLAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME LAKE CLASS /5V RANGESECTION_ TOWNSHIP oA- OOP -000 TOWNSHIP NAME PARCEL NUMBER FIRE/LAKE I.D. NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION /aoT 6 LfbUtiS fctsAcrt AfiO/O TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Setback Structure Size Sewage System Cluster Misc.Subdivision SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED A \/AA,y o A^CA A^l) (^5/Di. I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. SIGI^ TORE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE PPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) PuLhfd^ kdi ^ A^ld h / (p2!/ -Kf(P m M ' 002 /3 -^<9^ [jdlll^ (V^o vroUd- CUyJL-^ /O 7/^ dtcp m-^foo^00 M^4/ '»-/<^-9yAccepted By Land & Resource L & R Official/Date '7.-JL599TimeDate Of Hearing /V-^ -/ Motion Richard Guffey - Denied Motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to deny any proposed development that would cover more than 25% of the total lot area with impervious surfaces as no adequate hardship had been shown unique to the property that would allow for the granting of such a variance. After additional consideration motion was made by Cecil Femling, to approve a 6” variance from the required side lot line setback of 10’ with the condition that the proposed development cannot exceed 25% of the total lot area with impervious surfaces. This motion died for lack of a second. After additional discussion and consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to deny the side lot line variance as no adequate hardship had been shown unique to the property that would allow for the granting of a side lot line variance and other reasonable alterriatives exists. dn/Otter Ta I County Board of AdjustmentChain Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR L R Official/Date bk 0198-001 291.306 • Victor Lundeen Co.. Printors • Fergus Falls. Minnesota Page 5 October 14, 1999 Frances Mensching - Denied Frances Mensching, Missouri Valley, Iowa, requested a variance of 60’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the construction of a 10’ by 22’ deck 40’ from the ordinary high water level. It should be noted that the deck will not exceed what would be permitted by the string line, but the proposed deck is within the shore impact zone. The applicant’s dwelling will be setback 50’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lots 7 and 8, Pulford’s Beach, Walker Lake in Amor Township. Todd Pulford represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with David Henderson questioning the location of the lot lines. After consideration motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by Mark Steuart and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested and to honor the shore impact zone by restricting the placement of this new development within the shore impact zone. Richard Guffey - Denied Richard Guffey, Omaha, NE, requested “a variance to exceed impervious area by 2.9% and 6” to west line setback (side line).” Maximum allowable impervious surface coverage is 25% of the total lot area and the required side lot line setback is 10’. The property is described as Lot 6, Pulford’s Beach Addition, Walker Lake in Amor Township. A letter from Ken Haley expressing concerns with the applicant’s request was read for the record. Todd Pulford represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to deny any proposed development that would cover more than 25% of the total lot area with impervious surfaces as no adequate hardship had been shown unique to the property that would allow for the granting of such a variance. After additional consideration motion was made by Cecil Femling, to approve a 6" variance from the required side lot line setback of 10’ with the condition that the proposed development cannot exceed 25% of the total lot area with impervious surfaces. This motion died for lack of a second. After additional discussion and consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to deny the side lot line variance as no adequate hardship had been shown unique to the property that would allow for the granting of a side lot line variance and other reasonable alternatives exists. Oscar Kawlewski - Approved with conditions. Oscar Kawlewski, Ottertail, MN, requested a variance to subdivide 3 tracts of 22,500 square feet from an existing 74.99-acre parcel for the purpose of permanently attaching these tracts to existing lots in Channel View. It should be noted that the existing lots in Channel View are extremely substandard and need the additional area to update septic systems and for off road parking. The property is described as part of Government Lot 5, Section 34 of Rush Lake Township by the Otter Tail River. Clem Hendrickson, Surveyor, represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Mathias Turbes questioning what affect this variance would have on his lot. After consideration motion was made by Randall Mann, second by Bert Olson and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested with the following conditions: 1. a registered surveyor’s drawing must be provided, 2. no residential dwellings can be placed on these tracts, 3. the parcels must be permanently attached to the lake lots in Channel View, and 4. the area contained within these tracts cannot be considered when making the 25% impervious surface calculation for front lot development. Hardship is extremely substandard lake lots. 1 w’GRID PLOT PLAN feet SKETCHING FORM/grid(s) equals__JLScale;feet, or .inch(es) equals T ■% in 19 JiDated: Signature Please sketch your lot Indicating setbacks from road right-of-way, lake, sideyt rd and septic tank and drain- field for each buHdina currently on lot and any proposed structures. . l2o'li' /^foo / ' - -*■ 1 ' :iI-1 !::t l 1I■; 1 H- K■]i.l! j... 11^ri“- U‘u.i■ - -J If K>-j- k-h-r-:-+■ ■ !'k 5b -‘4 IV v&•1 )- 2^6 t[4T' 5 8^-t'\i{T T O f'H-. i4Ti.-4 1 I T v:■ -ii:• < (CTT^»trAii- .n^sr. -(-iJ.iJ\T4--¥~n^ 4—i:r:I- ■ 4 <■ ^-rriT i1 UJr4Ii- mI ' ’t ---------4- !lU 4;<3~ ~ 4ATiDiriW ' /+ -<a4}—---48o»* ■I 4 a- I . ^V.i-'!I z $/? a/ou«£ y cwp^ i - ff' Bki>* $:--t -II■: 3o'\y- tfr-J Trj-.,. /4_.:, . lO'”" .--4-' *-t I I ■T \ Tilt loo *■» * /Ct,ZfO fKtcHtrrO^ L.'f £LAIffi At* Fa^cEL If otooo<^‘)od^‘fcoe> I^ic 0% JWN l^4 40 pLAT oizil (hlZACH A"PP^ kor i C6IS£>-oooI( LAK^MKL — 0871 — 029 281,949 • Victor Lundeen Co, Prifnefs • Fergus Fails MN • 1-800-346-4070 / ye '/ 'f p To Wayne Stein I am writing this letter to express my concerns , about a variance at lot 6 , Pulford’s beach addition aRichard Guffey this is in section 2 township 134, range 40 township name Amor lake no 56-310 lake name walker, class -RD I would like to remain,, anonymous if possible but I think this variance should not be granted for the following reasons. If not you may use my name. 1. this addition will only be 16 feet from the neighbors septic tank system. 2. This man has just this year has add 40 yards of concrete for a driveway and a parking pad at, the ^>nd of it the drive i§ 12 feet wide and moat of it i§ ri^t onthe east side of the property .there is a big question of how much property is not covered by impervious surfrices . 3. I believe ttiat this properly is a least 4% over Ihe 25% rule now and if I have heard right this property up to 32 % impei-vious surface coverage , or more. 4. This coverage may be harmful to the lake , by creating more runoff 5. If this variance is granted, he will have only a six-foot strip to get to the lake side of the property without using the neighbors property to get there . 6. inqjervious surface coverage Main house 24 x 30 = 720 square feet addition to house 14 x 10 = 140 square feet 36x 24 = 864 square feet 38x 10 = 380 square feet 5 X 14 = 70 square feet 10x8 = 80 square feet Stall's to the lake wood 27x 3 =81 square feet 12 foot wide drivewi^ cement 107 x 12 =1284 square feet Apron in front of garage cement 36x 19 = 684 square feet Pad at end of driveway cement 76 x 20 = 1520 square feet Sidewalks cement 30x5 = 150 square feet Total square feet of the lot 75’ by 241’ = 18,075 Total of above surfaces 5973 square feet or 33 percent of impervious surface I am asking that this variance should not be granted , because it would be a possible Harm to the neighbor to the west,. by building so close to the line. The code is ten feet and it should st^ at ten feet it would not be a hardship to the property owner to keep the building ten feet from the line. The axldition he wants would be another 480 square feet bringing the total to 35,7 3 car garage Front deck Side deck Side deck % lliankYou y . y? Ken Haley Neighbor to the west 7-^ 9 >5^ / \ N •\ \