HomeMy WebLinkAbout02000990334000_Variances_08-08-2019Variances
Barcode 128
0-8-2019
1225035
CAROL SCHMALTZ
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
RECORDER/RE6ISTRAR OF TITLES
FERGUS FALLS, MN
RECORDED OH
08/16/2019 lls56 AM
FEE: 46,00
PAGES 4
WELL CERTIFICATE REC'D: H
r--
Date Stamp
I—«
■:ci
pieceived
JUL J 7 2019
LANOSfleSOOfiCE
A£>L&R Initial
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER.
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
Government Services Center, 540 W Fir Ave, Fergus Falls MN 56537
218-998-8095
www.ottertailcountymn.usOTTCR Tim
Application Fee ^CQ OO
Receipt Number /Dq^
DateAccepted by
Property Owner
Name ANNE ALZHEIMER & CARLA & CHRIS BERGER
Address 13077 Jackson St
City Becker
State MN
Zip 55308
Daytime
Phone 7634588901
Email ccjlbf@midco.net
Parcel Information
Lake Class I goLake NameLake No 242 Ottertail
Parcel Number(s) i gooo9903340oo
Parcel Number(s)I
SectionTownship Name 13Amor
Legal Description Section 13 Township 134 Range 040
Beauty Beach, Lot 4
Physical Address 39032 CO HWY 1 56576
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
structure
Setback Z]SubdivisionStructure Size Sewage System
MiscellaneousClusterWECS
1
SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJCT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. CITE THE RELEVANT SECTION(S) AND OTTER TAIL
COUNTY ORDINANCE(S) FROM WHICH THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS FOR. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC
NOTIFICATION.
OTTER TAIL COUNTY ORDINANCE: Shoroland Manaqoment Ordinance
Section 3, 4aSECTION OF ORDINANCE:
VARIANCE REQUEST:
We would like to replace the existing deteriorating structure on the lot with a new cabin. New structure would be moved back to the 75' OHWL
and put it in-line with cabins on either side. We are requesting a variance from the 10' lot line setback ordinance due to the tapered shape of our
narrow lot: 50' lake side down to 44' road side, in order to fit the new 30'x52' dwelling. We are looking for apprbval’of one of two options:
Option A) Maintain a 10' setback on the east side lot line and are requesting a 7.5' variance from the 10' setback on the west side;
Option B) Request a 4‘ variance on both lot lines, centering the structure between the lot lines;
The project will also include relocation of the existing shed to be compliant with the 10' lot line setback.
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT
ORDINANCES/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE/SANITATION CODE/SETBACK ORDINANCE AND/OR WECS ORDINANCE OF OTTER
TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE
MANAGEiyiEjltf^GARDING THIS MATTER._______________________
”7 OF P^PERTY OWNER/AGENT FOR OWNER DATE
7 APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
(Applicant will Receive Notification of the Date/Time of Hearing)
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date of Board of Adjustment Hearing ^Time i/ 3o O'■
Motion
Anne Alzheimer and Carla & Chris Berger - Variance Application Approved Option B as Requested (7:10 p.m.)
After consideration and discussion. Darren Newville made a motion, seconded by Kenneth Vorderbruggen and unanimously
carried to approve Option B to replace the existing dwelling being 6' from both side lotlines and as indicated in the variance
application dated July 12, 2019 as well as depicted on the drawing labeled Option B submitted with the variance application
and based on the Findings of Fact and Decision Form, which contains the criteria reviewed and the Board’s finding has been
attached to and incorporated as an official part of the minutes which has been placed on file with the Land & Resource
Management Department. The practical difficulty/hardship is the size and shape of the lot. The variance as approved does not
directly or indirectly grant any other variances for future development.
7^z
Chairman/otter Tail County Board of Adjustment
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes V No
Note: If Yes, contact Land & Resource Management
/\[rvujCopy of Application mailed/emailed to Applicant, County Assessor and MN DNR
L&R Official/Date
cl 01122019-001 2
Chris LeClair
DirectorOTTER TAIL COUNTY
LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
WWW.CO.OTTER-TAIL.MN.US
Kyle Westergard
Asst. DirectorOTTCRTflll
GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER
540 WEST FIR AVENUE
FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 218-998-8095
FAX: 218-998-8112
Board of Adjustment
Findings of Fact and Decision
Applicant:Anne Alzheimer and Carla & Chris Berger
Address/Parcel No. 39032 Co. Hwy 1, Richville / 02000990334000
Requested Variance: We would like to replace the existing deteriorating structure on the lot with a new cabin. New structure would
be moved back to the 75' OHWL and put in-line with cabins on either side. We are requesting a variance from the 10' lot line setback
ordinance due to the tapered shape of our narrow lot: 50' lake side down to 44' road side, in order to fit the new 30' x 52' dwelling.
We are looking for approval of one of two options: Option A) Maintain a 10' setback on the east side lot line and are requesting a
7.5' variance from the 10' setback on the west side: Option B) Request a 4' variance on both lot lines, centering the structure
between the lot lines: The project will also include relocation of the existing shed to be compliant with the 10' lot line setback.
Otter Tail County Ordinance: X Shoreland Mgmt. Sanitation. Subdivision. WECS Dock & Riparian Use Setback Ord.
Ordinance Section Citation: Section III. 4. A.
A variance may be granted only where the strict enforcement of county land use controls will result in a "practical difficulty". A
determination that a practical difficulty exists Is based upon consideration of the following criteria:
The applicant identified the following practical difficulty: The structure is in need of replacement: the owners inherited the lot
which is a narrow lot. Propose to move structure back to the 75' lake setback.
Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment - Variance Question Findings
. 1. Is the variance in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control? (The board shall consider the purposes
and intent of the official control).
X Yes, the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control...
No, the variance is NOT in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control...
...because:
The proposed replacement dwelling is being moved back to the required lake setback but they are limited with the Lotline
setback numbers because of the narrow lot.
2. Is the property owner proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official control? (The
board shall consider what reasonable use of the property is lost (practical difficulties) by the strict enforcement of the official
control).
X Yes, the property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner...
No, the property owner is NOT proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner...
...because:
There are similar structures and land uses in the neighborhood with similar setbacks to lotlines.
3. Is the need for a variance due to the circumstances unique to the property not created by the iandowner? (The board shall
consider what circumstances are unique to the property, such as lot size, lot configuration, wetland, steep slope, shore impact
zone, bluff, floodplain, floodway, etc. One or more should be stated on the record. What differentiates this parcel from others?
Does this iot have a feature that does not affect all parcels similarly?)
X Yes, the need for the variance is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner....
No, the need for the variance is NOT due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner...
...because:
The lot is an existing lot of record and with the lot being a narrow lot it limits the setback to the side lotlines.
4. Wiii the issuance of the variance maintain the essential character of the locality? (The board shall consider and state for the
record why the request does or does not maintain the character of the area. Is this request similar to what others have, what are
near shore conditions of neighbors, similar sized or number of structures adjacent or in area, etc.)
X Yes, the issuance of the variance will maintain the essential character of the locality....
No, the issuance of the variance will NOT maintain the essential character of the locality...
...because:
There are similar structures in the neighborhood with similar setbacks.
5. Does the need for the variance invoive more than just economic considerations? (The board shall consider if economics played
a role in the request. The fact that coming into compliance with the ordinance requirements may cost considerably more does
not constitute a practical difficulty).
X Yes, the need for the variance involves more than just economic considerations....
No, the issuance of the variance is only for economic considerations...
...because:
It appears that the practical difficulty is the size and shape of the lot.
The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment: APPROVES__X the requested variance.DENIES
Complete and attach After-the-Fact Addendum if this is an After-The-Fact variance request.
DATED:August 8, 2019
Board of Adjustment Chair
The Board of Adjustment may impose conditions in the granting of variances. A condition must be directly related to and must bear
a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. (Mitigating impervious surface with storm water management, deep
rooted vegetative buffers, rain gardens, etc.)
It is the Board of Adjustment's job to apply appropriate legal standards to a specific fact situation. Variances are meant to be an
infrequent remedy where an ordinance imposes a unique and substantial burden.
Steven & Carla Wurzer and Michael & Karen Wurzer - Continued
August 8, 2019 Amended Request
Steven & Carla Wurver, Lots 12 & 13 of South Point W BL, West Battle Lake in Girard Township, request the following:
Amendment to Variance Application by Steven and Carla Wurzer and Michael and Karen Wurzer regarding Lots 12 and 13 on
Southpoint of West Battle Lake, Section 31, Township 133, Range 39. The property address is 22359 Femcliff Road, Clitherall, MN,
56524.
As an alternative to the currently tabled variance application, Applicants request a variance to the 10 foot setback requirement
of Section 111.4 of the Shoreland Management Ordinance for Lot 12 to allow the existing house to remain even though it
currently is located approximately 9 inches from the current lot line shared with Lot 13. As a condition of this variance, a
maintenance easement will be granted to ensure that the owner of Lot 12 will be able to access and maintain their property
without trespassing or needing permission from the owner of Lot 13.
• As another alternative to the currently tabled variance application. Applicants request the lot line adjustment specified in the
original application and a variance from the minimum lot size and frontage requirements of Section III.3. of the Shoreland
Management Ordinance if the Board determines that the lot line adjustment requested creates new lots that need to comply
with existing lots size and frontage requirements rather than the 66% rule of MN Stat. Section 394.36. The lot size and
frontages for each lot are specified on the drawing included with the original variance.
For all three alternative requests presented. Applicants will comply with all other ordinances, including setback and septic
requirements.
Michael Wurzer represented the application. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A
letter was read in support of the variance request from John Lindner.
After consideration and discussion, Darren Newville made a motion, seconded by Brent Frazier and unanimously carried to approve
Option #2 as indicated in the amended variance request (email dated July 15, 2019) to allow a lot line adjustment between Lots 12 &
13 of South Point W BL as depicted on the drawing submitted with the original variance application dated June 20, 2019 which will
allow the dwelling structure on Lot 12 of South Point W BL to meet the 10’ lot line setback. Both Lots 12 & 13 of South Point W BL
are considered buildable for single family residential use and based on the Findings of Fact and Decision Form, which contains the
criteria reviewed and the Board’s finding has been attached to and incorporated as an official part of the minutes which has been
placed on file with the Land & Resource Management Department. The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any
other variances for future development.
Anne Alzheimer and Carla & Chris Berger - V'ariance Application Approved Option B as Requested (7:10 p.m.)
Anne Alzheimer and Carla & Chris Berger, Lot 4 of Beauty Beach, Otter Tail Lake in Amor Township, requested the following: We
are requesting a variance from the 10’ lot line setback ordinance on the western side of our lot. We would like to replace the existing
deteriorating structure on the lot with a new cabin. New structure would be moved back to the 75’ OHWL and put in-line with cabins
on either side. We will maintain a 10’ setback on the east side lot line to preserve the trees and other foliage and are requesting a 3’
variance from the 10’ setback on the west side of our lot, due to the tapered shape of our narrow lot: 50’ lake side down to 44’
roadside, in order to fit the 30’ x 52’ dwelling. The project will also include relocation of the existing shed to be compliant with the
10’ lot line setback.
Carla & Chris Berger represented the application. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as
requested.
After consideration and discussion, Darren Newville made a motion, seconded by Kenneth Vorderbruggen and unanimously carried to
approve Option B to replace the existing dwelling being 6’ from both side lotlines and as indicated in the variance application dated
July 12, 2019 as well as depicted on the drawing labeled Option B submitted with the variance application and based on the Findings
of Fact and Decision Form, which contains the criteria reviewed and the Board’s finding has been attached to and incorporated as an
official part of the minutes which has been placed on file with the Land & Resource Management Department. The practical
difficulty/hardship is the size and shape of the lot. The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances
for future development.
Board of Adjustment
August 8, 2019
Page I 3
LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
OTTER TAIL Government Services Center
540 West Fir Avenue
Fergus Falis, MN 56537COUNTY - MINNESOTA
Notice of Hearing for Variance
Applicant and/or applicant's representative must be present at the scheduled hearing.
To Whom it May Concern:
Anne Alzheimer
Carla & Chris Berger
13077 Jackson St.
Becker MN 55308
Has/have made application to the Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment for a variance as per
requirements of the Otter Tail County Shoreland Management Ordinance, the Otter Tail County Set Back
Ordinance, the Subdivision Controls Ordinance of Otter Tail County, Otter Tail County Sanitation Code
and/or the Wind Energy Conversion System Ordinance of Otter Tail County. The Otter Tail County Board
of Adjustment will assemble for this hearing on
Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 6:30 p.m.
in the Commissioner's Room of the Otter Tail County Government Services Center, Fergus Falls, MN.
(Please use the public entrance located on the northeasterly side of the Government Services Center.
The second left off Fir Ave.) Individuals requiring special accommodations should contact the Otter tail
County Land & Resource Management office prior to the date of the public hearing.
** Weather conditions may change the Hearing date and time. If bad weather occurs, please listen to the local Fergus Falls
Radio Stations or contact the Land & Resource Management Office by 4:30 p.m. for possible rescheduling of the Hearing.
The property concerned in the application is legally described and located at:
Parcel No. - 02000990334000
Lot 4 of Beauty Beach
Section 13, Township 134, Range 40
Township Name - Amor
Otter Tail (56-242), General Development (GD)
39032 Co. Hwy 1, Richville MN 56576
Legal Description:
Lake Name/Number/Class:
Property Address:
The variance requested is the following:
We would like to repiace the existing deteriorating structure on the lot with a new cabin. New structure wouid be
moved back to the 75' OHWL and put in-line with cabins on either side. We are requesting a variance from the 10'
lot line setback ordinance due to the tapered shape of our narrow iot: 50' lake side down to 44' road side, in order
to fit the new 30' x 52' dweiiing. We are looking for approvai of one of two options: Option A) Maintain a 10'
setback on the east side iot line and are requesting a 7.5' variance from the 10' setback on the west side; Option B)
Request a 4' variance on both lot lines, centering the structure between the iot lines; The project wiil also include
relocation of the existing shed to be compiiant with the 10' iot iine setback.
Amy liiisko
Board of Adjustment Secretary
July 25, 2019
(^) ottertailcountymn.usOTTER TAIL COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER218-998-8095
^ O^rWAi a"^
V
i _i (X
.xV'
o > \
■i
\
rt
0)3
^QJ
/
y /
■^y^ Or
/
/
Vc^/
.CP /is /
/
Wl1^-
\
\
\
\/\
/\osV/■q?'\
\
o \
\/\
V
«'■
v^
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION
List & identify all existing & proposed onsite impervious surfaces on scale drawing.
n.^00Lot Area (ft^):
Other Impervious SurfaceBuildings
Existing ProposedExistingProposed
Ft^Ft^Ft^Ft
Dwelling I, TOO Deck(s)
Attached Garage Patio(s)^00
Sidewalk(s)Detached Garage
storage Shed Landing(s)
WOAS Driveway(s)
RCU Parking Area(s)'Z oo
Miscellaneous Retaining Wall(s)
Landscaping
(Plastic Barrier)300
Miscellaneous
^oO%Z 0)0I . TOOTOTAL BUILDINGS TOTAL OTHER
Buildings
Impervious Surface
Percentage
Maximum Allowable 20%
Existing Proposed Total Lot Area Impervious
Surface
Ratio
Ft^Ft^Ft^Total Buildings Ft
I TOO IZ.9 %\2.HOO ■ 118=^100+-r X
Buildings + Other
Impervious Surface
Percentage
Maximum Allowable 25%
Total
Buildings + Other
Impervious Surface
Existing Proposed Total Lot Area Impervious
Surface
Ratio
Ft^Ft^ Ft^Ft^
20. /Z%7.160 I '2-WCO , 2.0 I 100-r X
Impervious Surface Calculation Worksheet 04-11-2016
Signature:Date
DEALER: FACTORY HOME CENTERNS2575 PAGE:
<NORTHSTAR
SiYSTCMBU ILT
203 Industrial Drive
Redwood Foils, MN644-6600
644-6601
ELEVATIONS CUSTOMER: BERGERDRAWN BY:SPC A2.1(507^(507)Ph:
Fx:REV:B BY:SPC DATE: 04/24/19 SCALE: 1/8"= 1-0"DATE: 02/18/19
■I
Compliance Inspection FormMinnesota Pollution
Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road North
SLPaulMN 55155-4194
Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS)
Doc Type: Compliance and Enforcement
For local tracking purposes:Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
requirements and attached forms - additional local requirements may also apply.
Submit completed form to Local Unit of Government (LUG) and system owner
within 15 days
System Status
System status on date (mm/dd/yyyy): 5/16/19
[^Compliant - Certificate of Compliance [^Noncompliant - Notice of Noncompliance
(Valid for 3 years from report date, unless shorter time
frame outlined in Local Ordinance.)
(See Upgrade Requirements on page 3.)
Reason(s) for noncompliance (check all.applicable)i Impact on Public Health (Compliance Component #1)- Imminent threat to public health and safety
___Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance Component #3) - Imminent threat to public health and safety
___Tank Integrity (Compliance Component #2) - Failing to protect groundwater
Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance Component #3) - Failing to protect groundwater
Soil Separation (Compliance Component #4) - Failing to protect groundwater
Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements (Compliance Component #5) - Noncompliant□
Property Information
Property address: 39032 County Highway 1_____
Property owner: Anne Alzheimer & Carla Berger
02000990334000Parcel ID# or Sec/Twp/Range:
Reason for inspection: sale
Owner’s phone:
or 763-458-8694Owner’s representative: Chris Berger
Local regulatory authority: OTWMD
Brief system description: 1000 gallon to 600 gallon shared lift station connected to cluster D.F.
Comments or recommendations:
Representative phone:
Regulatory authority phone: 218-864-5533
Certification
/ hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No
determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction,
possible abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage.
Inspector name: Alex Kvidt
Business name: OTWMD
Inspector signature: Alex Kvidt
Certification number: 9744________
License number: 487_________
Phone nurriber: 218-864-5533) Digitally signed by Alex Kvidt
/'Date: 2019.05.16 12:24:07-05'00'
Necessary or Locally Required Attachments
I___Bystem/As-built drawing I Iporms per local ordinanceSoil boring logs
Other information (list):
TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864. • Available tn alternative formats
Page f o/3
vww.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864
wq-wwists4-31b • 6/4/14
5/16/19AK39032 County Highway 1 Inspector inilials/Date:iProperty address:
(mm/dd/yyyy)
1 ■ Impact on Public Health - Compliance component #1 of 5
Verification method(s):
Searched for surface outlet
Searched for seeping in yard/backup in home
Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes
Homeowner testimony fSee Comments/Explanation)
Black soil” above soil dispersal system
System requires “emergency” pumping
Performed dye test
Jnable to verify (See Comments/Explanation)
Other methods not listed (See Comments/Explanation)
Compliance criteria:/[/]noSystem discharges sewage to the
ground surface.________________
Yes
[Ves |y^[NoSystem discharges sewage to drain
tile or surface waters.
Qes[7fjoSystem causes sewage backup into
dwelling or establishment.
Any “yes” answer above indicates the
system is an imminent threat to pubiic
heaith and safety.
Comments/Exptanation:
•Iv-
2. Tank Integrity - Compliance component #2 of 5
Verification method(s):
I / I Probed tank(s) bottom
I / [Examined construction records
I I Examined Tank Integrity Form (Attach)
I [Observed liquid level below operating depth
I [Examined empty (pumped) tanks(s)
I [Probed outside tank(s) for “black soil” -
I [Unable to verify (See Comments/Explanation)
I I Other methods not listed (See Comments/Explanation)
Compliance criteria:
- System consists of a seepage pit,
cesspool, drywell, or leaching pit.
Seepage pits meeting 7080.2550 may be
compliant it allowed in local ordinance.
[Yes I ^ |NoSewage tank{s);.leak below .their
designed operating depth.
If yes, which sewage tank(s) leaks:
Any “yes” answer above indicates the
system is fading to protect groundwater.
Comments/Explanation:
3. Other Compliance Conditions - Compliance component #3 of 5 ■
a. Maintenance hole covers are damaged, cracked, unsecured, or appear to be structurally unsound.] [Yes* Q No Qunkn
b. Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety. j^Yes* [^No [""[Unknown
*System is an imminent threat to pubiic heaith and safety.
Explain: ^
own
c. System is non-protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector. | | Yes* [ / [No
’‘System is faiiing to protect groundwater.
Explain:
www.pca.state.mn.us
wq-wwists4-31b • 614/14
800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800t657-38M • Available in alternative formats
Page 2 of 3
651-296-6300
AK 5/16/19Property address: 39032 County Highwsy 1 Inspector initials/Date:i(mm/dd/yyyy)
4, Soil Separation - Compliance component #4 of 5
I [unknown1984/2007Date of installation:Verification method(s):
Soil observation does not expire. Previous soil
observations by two independent parties are sufficient,
unless site conditions have been altered or local
requirements differ.
I I Conducted soil observation(s) (Attach boring logs)
I [Two previous verifications {Attach boring logs)
[ |Not applicable (Holding tank(s), no drainfield)
I [Unable to verify (See Commenis/Explanation)
I / [Other (See Comments/Explanation)
Comments/Explanation:
Connected to District Cluster Drainfield
(mm/dd/yyyy)
Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food beverage
lodging?
|Yes| [no
Compliance criteria:
For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and
not located in Shoreland or Wellhead
Protection Area or not serving a food,
beverage or lodging establishment:
Drainfield has at least a tvi/o-foot vertical
separation distance from periodically
saturated soil or bedrock. _______
No
/JvesQNon-performance systems built April 1,
1996, or later or for non-performance
systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead
Protection Areas or serving a food,
beverage, or lodging establishment:
Drainfield has a three-foot vertical
separation distance from periodically
saturated soil or bedrock.*
No
^YesQ Indicate depths or elevations"Experimental", “Other", or “Performance"
systems built under pre-2008 Rules; Type IV
or V systems built under 2008 Rules (7080.
2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector
License required)
Drainfield meets the designed vertical
separation distance from periodically
saturated soil or bedrock.
No
A. Bottom of distribution media
B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock
C. System separation
D. Required compliance separation*
*May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local
Ordinance.Any “no” answer above indicates the system is
faiiing to protect groundwater.
^ Not applicable5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP* - Compliance component #5 of 5
No If “yes”, A below is required
No If “yes”, B below is required
Is the system operated under an Operating Permit?
Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP?
BMP = Best Management Practice(s) specified in the system design
If the answer to both questions is “no”, this section does not need to be completed.
Yes
Yes
Compliance criteria
a. Operating Permit number: ____________________
Have the Operating Permit requirements been met?
QnoYes
I |no
b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning?Yes
Any “no” answer indicates Noncompiiance.
Upgrade Requirements (Minn. Slal. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use
discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance.. If the system is failing to protect
ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system
is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or
its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas.
Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food; beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law.
TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats
Page 3 of 3
800-657-3864www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300
wq-wwists4-31b • 6/41.14
Department of
LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
OTTER TA>L COUNTY
GovernmovIt Services center - 540 West Fir
Fergus Falls, MN 56537
PH; ai8-998-8095
OtTer Tail County's website: www.co.otter-tail.mn.usOTTCR mil
e TT••
Otter Tail County Compliance Inspection Form Addendum
This form is a required attachment to MPCA Compliance Inspection Form for all Existing Subsurface Sewage
Treatment Systems in Otter Tail County as of June 1,2011.
Property Information
Parcel Number: 02000990334000
Township: l^or
Property Owner Name(s): Anne Alzheimer & Carla Berger
Property Address: 39032 County Highway 1
Reason for Inspection: Sale
Number of Bedrooms: fs
Section: 13
YesIn Shoreland Area?
Lake/River Name, Number, & Class
No
Ottertail
System Compliance Status:Compliant
Non-Compliant
£.Does the soil treatment area have less than 3 feet of vertical separation?
Is the septic tank located less than 50 feet from any well?
Is the soil treatment area located less than 50 feet from any deep well?
Is the soil treatment area located less than 100 feet from any shallow well?
Does any part of the septic system fail to meet the minimum OHWL setback
requirements for the public water classification?
Yes Mo
/Yes Mo
Yes / No
No/
NoYes
nn
"Yes" indicates that the system is failing to protect ground water and
is noncompliant. If "Yes", describe the condition noted:
Required Attachments: System drawing to scale on next page.
Completed MPCA Compliance Inspection
I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of
future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system,
inadequate maintenance, or future water usage.
Name: Alex Kvidt
Certification Number: 9744
Business License Name & Number: OTWMD 487
Signature: Alex Kvidt uigiiaiiy signea oy Aiex isviai
Date; 2019.05.16 12:24:58 -05'00'Date: 5/16/19
Page 1 of 2Excel/Compliance Form for OTC 1/15/2014
Otter Tail County Compliance Inspection Form Addendum (cont.)
Parcel Number: 020009903^000
Date & Initial: ak 5/I6/19
System Drawing
The system drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale in feet or indicates all setback distances, all septic/holding/lift tanks,
drainfields, wells within 100 feet of system (indicate depth of wells), dwelling and non-dwelling structures, lot lines, road right-of-ways,
easements, OHWLs, wetlands, and topographic features (i.e. bluffs).
Additional Comments:
Excel/Compliance Form for OTC 4/14/2017 Page 2 of 2
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
Fergus Falls, Minnesota
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL )
I, Amy Busko, Secretary for the Board of Adjustment for Otter Tail County, Minnesota, do hereby certify
that on the 25th day of July, 2019 the attached Notice of Hearing for Variance was duly served upon
the individuals listed below and/or included in the attachment:
Township Clerk Lake AssociationProperty Owner
Brenda Hildebrand, Clerk
Amor Township
30411 Amor Park Rd
Battle Lake MN 56515
Otter Tail Lake Association
OTLPOA
PO Box 21
Battle Lake MN 56515
Anne Alzheimer
Caria & Chris Berger
13077 Jackson St.
Becker MN 55308
City Clerk (if located within 2 miles of a city) NA
Lake Improvement District (If project is located on their lake, mail notices to the Lake Improvement District)
Big McDonald Lake Improvement Dist., PO Box 81, Dent, MN 56528
Devils Lake Imp. Dist., PO Box 431 Perham, MN 56573
Little McDonald, Kerbs & Paul: LMKP Lakes Imp. Dist., PO Box 133, Perham, MN 56573
Pine Lakes Imp. Dist., PO Box 405, Perham, MN 56573
Pelican, Fish, Bass & Lt Pelican: Pelican Lake Group Lake Imp. Dist., PO Box 336, Pelican Rapids, MN 56572
South Turtle Lake Imp. Dist., PO Box 168, Underwood, MN 56586
(0
Big McDonald:
Devils (Near Perham):
UJ
Little Pine & Big Pine:
South Turtle Lake:
Otter Tail County COLA, 4302 13**' Ave S Ste. 4-333, Fargo, ND 58103
Chuck Grotto, OTC Hwy Engineer, 505 S Court St Suite #1, Fergus Falls, MN 56537
Julie Aadland, DNR Eco & Water Resources, 1509 1®' Ave N, Fergus Falls, MN 56537
Board of Adjustment Members:
Ken Vorderbrugen, 20901 County Hwy 65, Henning MN 56551
R. Stephen Schierer 32117 260'^ Ave, Erhard MN 56534
Thomas (Tom) Lee, 15600 County Hwy 118, Elizabeth MN 56533-9559
Darren M Newville, 614 6'^ St NE, Perham, MN 56573
Douglas Larson, 2118 Woodland Ln., Fergus Falls MN 56537
Planning Commission Member: Brent Frazier, PO Box 255, Pelican Rapids MN 56572
By placing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid and depositing the
same in the United States Mail at Fergus Falls, MN, properly addressed to each of the individuals listed
above and/or listed in the attachment.Number of Notices &
Envelopes to Print
IFileDated: July 25, 2019
O’Extra
BOA Members
PC Member_
Envelopes__
TOTAL NOTICES TO PRINT _
fj^Added to Agenda Lid^
I I Print out Finding&of Fact Sheet
Newspapers ff \\X 4- (3 -t
d/IULn^^^
Amy Busko, Secretary
Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment 6
1 i/IVlinutes
Amy Basko mBy:
Map
l:\BOA\Affidavits\Alzheimer (242) 08-08-19.docx
Buffer Parcels
Addr2 Citv St ZiDAddr 1Parcel No Name 1 Name 2
Perham MN 56573 861437654 County Highway 3420000100062004 Donald & Dolores M Bernauer
Perham MN 56573 861420000100062005 James W & Julie E Peters 37732 County Highway 34
Mounds View MN 55112 61388350 Pleasant View Dr20000100062007 Peter W Olson
Perham MN 56573 861620000150087004 Paul B & Kjersten J Hunt 43946 Paul Lake Dr W
Fargo ND 58103 314920000150087005 Alexander Belquist & B Nelson 1117 9th St 5
Perham MN 56573 861620000150087012 Michael & Gail Pickett 44011 Paul Lake Dr W
Perham MN 56573 8616Robert James Hendrickson 43880 Paul Lake DrW20000150087013
Perham MN 56573 861643968 Paul Lake Dr \N20000150087024 Joseph J &. Rebecca L Esser
Perham MN 56573 861044014 Paul Lake DrWSwanson Family Rev 1st20000150087903
Perham MN 56573 861044014 Paul Lake Dr W20000990334000 Swanson Family Rev 1st
Perham MN 56573 8610Dennis & Shirley Davidson 44042 Paul Lake DrW20000990335000
44042 Paul Lake Dr W Perham MN 56573 8610Dennis & Shirley Davidson20000990336000
Perham MN 56573 861620000990724000 Mark A & Kimberly D Wright 44157 Paul Lake DrW
Perham MN 56573 8616Raymond & Linda Jean Kaluza 44079 Paul Lake DrW20000990725000
20000990924000 Jeremy L & Chrystal Rittenbach 7897 28th St SE Jamestown ND 58401 9240
Perham MN 56573 861120000990925000 Ronald D Jr & Lori J Peterson 44114 Paul Lake DrW
Page 1 of 1Thursday. July 18. 2019
Buffer Mail
City, State, ZipAddress 2Address 1Name
Fargo ND 58103 31491117 9th St SAlexander Belquist & B Nelson
Perham MN 56573 861437654 County Highway 34Donald & Dolores M Bernauer
Perham MN 56573 861044042 Paul Lake Dr WDennis & Shirley Davidson
Perham MN 56573 861643968 Paul Lake Dr WJoseph J & Rebecca L Esser
Perham MN 56573 861643880 Paul Lake Dr WRobert James Hendrickson
Perham MN 56573 861643946 Paul Lake Dr WPaul B & Kjersten J Hunt
Perham MN 56573 861644079 Paul Lake Dr WRaymond & Linda Jean Kaluza
Mounds View MN 55112 61388350 Pleasant View DrPeter W Olson
Perham MN 56573 861437732 County Highway 34James W & Julie E Peters
Perham MN 56573 861144114 Paul Lake Dr WRonald D Jr & Lori J Peterson
Perham MN 56573 861644011 Paul Lake Dr WMichael & Gail Pickett
Jamestown ND 58401 9240Jeremy L & Chrystal Rittenbach 7897 28th St SE
Perham MN 56573 861044014 Paul Lake Dr WSwanson Family Rev 1st
Perham MN 56573 8616Mark A & Kimberly D Wright 44157 Paul Lake Dr W
Page 1 of 1Thursday, July 18, 2019