Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout60000990319000_Variances_10-03-2002\D913128OFFICE WCOUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this instrument #_ was filed/recorded in this office for record on the ^ day of 2002 at Wendy L.^Metcatf, County Becoixl^r by; ( Jjt>.0dr/U r^co^in^f^/ ^ weii certificate 913138 l^epaly^ THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739-2271 Ext. 225 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertaii.mn.us / /50"Application Fee Accepted By / Date <S^/ DAYTIME PHONE 'S.lt __ COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number I IHH2 ?AH<er% t>>UiDN MH S PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS LAKE NUMBER S>^-Q\Z LAKE NAME is/ H/K SECTION ^1 TOWNSHIP ^3/ RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME LAKE CLASS Tom u It' PARCEL NUMBER hoOcof\03i^ cc»E-911 ADDRESS Di>~- LEGAL DESCRIPTION TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Setback ^ Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Ciuster Misc. SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED ^ O. S^) I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. 1 J SIGNA/uRE' of property OWNER - n 3^ DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) /.. r So /cLa^ ■OOo (itu' 90 y £:y'. ' < CA •■-? 1 'I S/0 cl/J A SOhiSOt.- ^ Vc- //, r /-'<VJ' ^ S >dr: O / 0<do ’M ^ ■V//;^c> 'r?V'V SO^'S/' i.j / </r/¥V/ A-vO -JTr'v -iA"Ac A "7 30^dMd3/0 ^ dil-COO ~oOO / ” - ^ C~ ~ cfrd-■'dj.Li -''-' dddO v.. :;i dPc-Ai^/? SaJ O^ooz d'SO /g/r?.Date Of Hearing Time Motion Roger Mickelson - Denied. (6:30 p.m.) Motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested. It was noted that a reasonable use the applicant’s property could be obtained without the granting of a variance, as there are other locations available for the proposed development, which would not require the granting of a variance. It was also noted that if the applicant’s drawing accurately represents the location of the proposed garage the addition would be ahead of the building line. ail County Board ^XHjustment—Chairman/Otter Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management _____Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR BK-0402-001 309,424 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls. Minnesota MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE OTTER TAIL COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Thursday, October 3, 2002 The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment met Thursday, October 3, 2002, with the following persons in attendance: Cecil Femling Randall Mann Mark Steuart Pat Eckert, Land and Resource Management Kurt Mortenson, Assistant County Attorney Paul Larson Steve Schierer Leona Zimmerman Call to Order - Randall Mann, Chair, called the meeting of the Board of Adjustment to order at 6:30 p.m. Minutes Approved - Hearing no corrections or additions the minutes of the September 12, 2002 meeting was approved as mailed. The following variance requests were heard: Roger Mickelson - Denied. (6:30 p.m.) Roger Mickelson, Dalton, MN, requested a variance of 50’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the construction of a 24’ by 30’ addition to an existing garage located 50’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lots 26 through 32, Sater Humphrey Ranch Camp, Ten Mile Lake in Tumuli Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested. It was noted that a reasonable use the applicant’s property could be obtained without the granting of a variance, as there are other locations available for the proposed development, which would not require the granting of a variance. It was also noted that if the applicant’s drawing accurately represents the location of the proposed garage the addition would be ahead of the building line. Delores R Weitzel - Approved as modified. (6:40 p.m.) Delores R. Weitzel, Wahpeton, ND, requested a variance of 100’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the construction of a 56’ by 30’ storage building 100’ from the ordinary high water level of Beauty Shore Lake. The property is described as a 2.5-acre parcel in Government Lot 3, Section 20 of Girard Township by West Battle Lake and Beauty Shore Lake. Bill Weitzel appeared along with the applicant at the public hearing. A letter from Virginia Hermann stating that the proposed location would be aesthetically incompatible with the surrounding area was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to approve the placement of a 780 square foot garage at least (no closer than) 100’ from Beauty Shore Lake and it must meet the required ordinary high water level setback from West Battle Lake. Hardship is that the applicant’s property is located being two bodies of water and the terrain of the applicant’s property. The 780 square foot structure, as approved, will provide the applicant with a reasonable use of her property. It was also noted that a 56’ by 30’ structure is an oversized structure for lakeshore property. ScAk Jnch(es) equals feet.grid(s), equals feet, orScale:.» Please use this sheet for the required, scale drawing of your proposal. Be sure to include lot dimension, water frontage, and setbacks from RW, lake, lot lines, sewage system, top of bluff, existing structures and all imper­ vious surface. Required impervious surface coverage calculation (See definition in Shoreland Management Ordinance) 0.1%X 100 =‘ % Total Impervious Surface Onsite (FT2) : Total Lot Area (FT2) /F' ^O' 1 l(„xZ0 f - -1X0°' 5-wxS‘e, 2n^o ^— — — ^/7'—^22' |8"7''i V , 1 13 ■ •1 ~ c^O ~~ C) p2—✓ Dated 304,678 • Victor Lundeen Co., Printers • Fergus Falls. MN • 1-800-346-4870