The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About60000990298000_Variances_11-03-1994APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA r* Receipt No. Application Fee $ Sear i'-e ^I' f)______ Mid<Mk ll<^ AJR Hi'/WUz/rV ffJCuS f'PrVt''^ MA/ street & No. ' C/fy State i-PUF 7"4'7V/9 <7, ^A/-e Phone:Owner:FirstLast Name Zip No. TOLake ClassLake NameLake No. 111n Twp. NameTwp. RangeSec. Legal Description:Fire No. or Lake ID #, \Uuilfj\JUH, [( Qau^ [oO^poo-h^'Y>><^^0Parcel Number VARIANCE REQUESTED IS: .JT■I- sy / I,.to lo+u^vx ‘"r;wfrQ SlZ-TV?^ L I her^y cartify that the within ior^record li thit office on theA.D. ign^at^^O and was duly Mcrofilmad ae Ooc. ment was died _day of‘il-M..cs io' k County Recorder deputy In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much suppiementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. 19Application dated . X Signature Of Applicant 19_^7 P//- d . Time:MDate of hearing: ____ MOTION AS FOLLOWS: Motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship had been shown, the additions more than 25X of the lot would be covered by impervious surfaces. It was noted that with Chairman Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment NOYESPermit(s) from Land & Resource Maqegement required: Ill'iMT mailed copy of Application to Applicant.(Date/Initial) MKL — 0483-001 256.371 Victor Lundeen Co.. Printers, Fergus Falls, Minnesota Page 2 November 3rd> 1994 Ronald Tobkin and Hac Tobkln - Approved Ronald Tobkin and Mac Tobkin, Perharo, MN, requested a variance to subdivide Lot 3, Block 1, Lazy Acres, into three tracts. Tract A would have 4,369 square feet and would be attached to Lot 2, Block 1, Lazy Acres. Tract B would have 42,100 square feet of area and 155' of water frontage and Tract C would have 39,300 square feet of area and 155' of water frontage. The minimum water frontage and lot area for platted lots on a general development lake is 100' of water frontage and 20,000 square feet. The property is described as Lot 3, Block 1, Lazy Acres, Marion Lake in Rush Lake Township. The applicant was represented by David Guedna at the hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to approve subdiuiding Lot 3, Block 1, Lazy Acres into three tracts as depicted on the registered survey prepared by Roy Smith and dated September 21st, 1994.It was noted that all three tracts are serviced by a dedicated public road and Tracts B and C meet the minimum requirements for platted lots on a general development lake. It was noted that the hardship was created by an error in the original survey. Gerald P. Bommersbach - Approved Gerald P. Bommersbach, Wahpeton, ND, requested a variance of 50' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100* for a 7* by S' addition to an existing porch 50' from the ordinary high water level. The addition would extend the porch out even with the front of the cabin. The property is described as Lot 3 of Madsen's Survey Lots of Government Lot 1 and 2, Section 13 of Amor Township on Walker Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 50' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for a 7' by 8' addition to an existing porch 50' from the ordinary high water level. Hardship being a substandard lot of record. It was noted that the addition would be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure. Arnold and Janice Ness, Lynn Goerger and Janice Friedrich - Tabled Arnold and Janice Ness, Barnesville, MN, and Lynn Goerger and Janice Friedrich, West Fargo, ND, requested a variance of 27' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' for the location of two septic tanks 48' from the ordinary high water level, a variance of 7' from the required structure setback of 10’ for the location of a septic tank 3' from the cabin located on Parcel C and a 10' variance from the required structure setback of 10' for the location of a septic tank 0' from the cabin located on Parcel B. The property is described as Parcels B and C of Government Lot 2, Section 20 of Dunn Township on Lake Lizzie. The audience was not polled as there was no one in attendance. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Carl Johnson and unanimously carried, to table the variance request until the December 2nd, 1994, Board of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicants an opportunity to discuss possible alternatives with the Land and Resource office. Donald E. Searles - Denied Donald E. Searles, Fergus Falls, MN, requested a variance of 2.5' from the required side lot line setback of 10' for a 16' by 44' building addition, with an attached 26' by 28' garage, to an existing dwelling 7.5' from the side lot line. The property is described as Lots 10, 11 and 12, Sather Humphrey Ranch Camp, Ten Mile Lake in Tumuli Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship had been shown. It was noted that with + V1C1 + T + +V»Ci 1^. +/-• -r* c* Tt\ r-i *r- Q MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE OTTER TAIL COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT November 3rd, 1994 The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment met Thursday, November 3rd, 1994, with the following persons in attendance: Craig Anderson John Everts Cecil Femling Carl T. Johnson Randall Mann George Walter Kyle Westergard, Land and Resource Management Kurt Mortenson, Assistant County Attorney CALL TO ORDER - The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman George Walter. MINUTES APPROVED - October 13th, 1994 -1 Hearing no corrections or additions the minutes of the October 13th, 1994 meeting were declared approved as mailed.<! The following variance requests were heard: Karen G. O'Keeffe - Approved Karen G. O'Keeffe, Fargo, ND, requested a variance of 6' from the required side lot line setback of 10' for the addition of a 12' by 24' carport to an existing garage 4' from the side lot line. The property is described as the most westerly Lot 7, Block 2, Pelican Point and vacated road adjacent. Pelican Lake in Dunn Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Carl Johnson, seconded by Cecil Femling and carried with John Everts voting no, to approve a variance of 6' from the required side lot line setback of 10' for the addition of a 12' by 24' carport to an existing garage 4' from the side lot line with the condition that the existing garage cannot be converted to a second dwelling. It was noted that the carport will be no closer to the side lot line than the existing garage. 1;1 ■ iDean Michael Lilja - Approved Dean Michael Lilja, Ottertail, MN, requested a variance of 5' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' for a 5' by 15' addition to the side of an existing structure 70' from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lot 10, Block 1, Echo Ranch Riviera First Addition, Otter Tail Lake in Otter Tail Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 5' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' for a 5' by 15' addition to the side of an existing structure 70' from the ordinary hiqh water level. It was noted that the addition will be no closer to the ordinary hlgn water level than the existing structure and that the structure on this parcel was in compliance at the time of the original construction. 4'1ii a 1 J;